PLA Navy news, pics and videos

antiterror13

Brigadier
Only DDG 136 Hangzhou is in serious upgrade. As for DDG 137 Fuzhou, it was probably a routine "health check", as it went back to joint the fleet pretty soon afterwards. Not sure if any internal electronics have been updated though.

True .... and its a bit odd as 136 and 137 are the original Sovremennyy for PLAN, so I'd expect these 2 are exactly the same
 

by78

General
Poly Technologies High-Speed Intercept Boat. It has both manned and unmanned modes...

25937095324_9469924db7_o.jpg
25937095364_604ff9a27d_o.jpg
25939148493_37b8a00c98_b.jpg
26449737722_5fb03be727_o.jpg


More information from this
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
:

The former is titled the High-Speed Intercept Boat. It is being shown for the first time outside China, even though it is still in development.

A Poly Technologies representative said the 13m-long craft will be ready for sale next year once development concludes. It is being created in conjunction with Harbin Engineering University, with the target client being naval and maritime security agencies at home and abroad.

It is understood that the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) has been trialling the High-Speed Intercept Boat to secure a naval base.

In tests the trimaran-hulled vessel has achieved a top speed of 75kt, although the target is 80kt. It is propelled by twin 850hp engines and has a 600mm draft. Its range is listed as 200nm.

Company literature states the High-Speed Intercept Boat can accommodate a crew of six, confirming it can perform either manned or unmanned ‘patrolling, intercepting and military missions’.

Optional armament on the sleek High-Speed Intercept Boat, which use planing technology to achieve its high speeds, includes a 12.7mm machine gun or two 7.62mm machine guns...
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
DSA 2016: China details new sub-launched ASCM and old LCU

China revealed a new submarine launched anti-ship cruise missile (ASCM) at the Defense Services Asia (DSA) 2016 exhibition and provided details for an older landing craft utility (LCU) now being promoted for export.

Products of the China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation (CASIC), the new turbojet powered 290 km range CM-708UNB submarine-launched ASCM compliments the 128 km range CM-708UNA revealed at the 2014 Zhuhai Airshow.

While the CM-708UNA is likely derived from the YJ-82 (C-802) ASCM, the longer range CM-708UNB is likely derived from a longer range version of the YJ-82 or YJ-83 (C-803) ASCMs.
A 1,200 kg 'torpedo' carrier launches the 5.05 m and 700 kg missile, which has a speed of Ma .08 to Ma .09 and uses integrated INS/Satellite and millimeter wave radar for guidance. It is armed with a 155 kg warhead and in its terminal phase flies 5-7 m above the water.

Also detailed for the first time was the 693 ton and 63 meter long, LC63, the export designation for the Type 074A Yubei catamaran small amphibious landing craft. This ship first emerged in open images on Chinese web pages early in the last decade, but Chinese sources suggest it may have entered service as early as 1995.

A Chinese official at DSA 2016 told IHS Jane's that the LC63 had been sold to a "friendly country" outside of Asia.

It is capable of operations in up to Sea State 5, has a range of 500 nm at 14 kt or an endurance of five days and uses a side exhaust system to help conceal its infrared signature. It is armed with two 14.5 mm machine guns.

The LC63 can carry up to 250 tons of cargo, which could include 3 Type 96 main battle tanks, 6 Type 63 amphibious tanks or up to 250 "heavily armed soldiers."

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
Chinese fisherman snags UUV supposedly from the US.

024840siidjdxe1sssscsz.jpg

I believe this is the second one. The other one was torpedo size. Are these things suppose to be retrieved or are they disposable? A woman in the US was arrested recently for supposedly passing UUV tech secrets to China. At this rate no need for spies.
 
I don't know if it's a hoax, if I'm in the correct Thread (I assume the missile would be intended to attack surface targets, as in:
how-an-hgv-flies.jpg
) anyway:
China successfully tests 7,000 mph DF-2F hypersonic missile says Pentagon source
China has conducted a successful test flight of its hypersonic DF-2F missile, capable of speeds of up to 7,000 mph (11,000 kph) according to sources within the US Pentagon. If confirmed this would be the seventh successful flight of the DF-2F, and comes just days after Russia successfully flew its own hypersonic test missile.

The test missile was tracked by US satellites being launched from the Chinese site at Wuzhai and skipped along the top of the earth's atmosphere at several thousand miles per hour before reaching its target in the west of the country. The test took place on Friday (22 April) and follows other tests conducted in 2014 and 2015.

There are fears within the Pentagon that China might be perfecting an even quicker missile, the DF-ZF (also known as WU-14), which can reach speeds of 11,000 kph - making it too fast for any anti missile systems to deal with. The delivery system could enable China to reach any point in the world with a nuclear missile in under one hour.

Russian test

On Tuesday 26 April, Russia tested its own hypersonic missile from a base in Orenburg near the Kazakhstan border. The missile was reported by Russian state media to be the RS-18A strategic ballistic missile (UR-100N, NATO designation SS-19 Stiletto.

The
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
it will have a series of hypersonic missiles ready to use by 2017. The missiles would have a relatively short range of 400 miles but could be used to knock out enemy ships without warning.

Fearing it could be left behind in the global arms race by its rivals Russia and China the US has also announced an increase in hypersonic missile research. According to the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
the US is increasing hypersonic spending by 50% although the US is also investing in research into
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, laser weapons and other hi-tech weaponry.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
I don't know if it's a hoax, if I'm in the correct Thread (I assume the missile would be intended to attack surface targets, as in:
how-an-hgv-flies.jpg
) anyway:
China successfully tests 7,000 mph DF-2F hypersonic missile says Pentagon source

source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Why would it be a hoax? It's not like DF-ZF/WU-14 tests are anything new.

Anyway, the same article was posted in the ballistic missile thread in the strategic weapons sub forum... this news probably isn't very relevant for navy matters.
 

Franklin

Captain
Does China today have a "Big Navy Policy" like under Ronald Reagan where they are constantly commissioning new ships into the navy while keeping the old ones sailing. Because we keep hearing about the commissionings of new ships but there is hardly any news of decommissionings in the PLAN.
 

delft

Brigadier
Does China today have a "Big Navy Policy" like under Ronald Reagan where they are constantly commissioning new ships into the navy while keeping the old ones sailing. Because we keep hearing about the commissionings of new ships but there is hardly any news of decommissionings in the PLAN.
PLAN is much to small yet to talk about a "Big Navy Policy". One can consider this matter when the number of flattops and nuclear submarines approaches that of USN and that is some twenty years away, if it ever happens.
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Does China today have a "Big Navy Policy" like under Ronald Reagan where they are constantly commissioning new ships into the navy while keeping the old ones sailing. Because we keep hearing about the commissionings of new ships but there is hardly any news of decommissionings in the PLAN.

I'm not sure what a Chinese equivalent of "big navy policy" would be, but I do think the Chinese Navy does have a current requirement to not only modernize its fleet but also to expand its fleet size and tonnage.

For most of the last couple of decades their front line surface combatant force was made up of six destroyer flotillas, each with about four destroyers and four frigates for 24 destroyers and 24 frigates in total. Even assuming all ships were modernized, 24 modern DDGs and 24 modern FFGs would probably be an insufficient force for the Navy's missions today.
 
Top