I still do not see the overhang portion of the ship which would be indicative that it is in fact a super carrier.
You are joking me, surely? I swear, this is deja vu.
https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/pl...ogramme-news-views.t6479/page-431#post-366366
I'll respond with what I wrote last time, and also Intrepid's post:
I'm not sure what you mean -- at this stage of relatively early construction, when the hangar has not even been raised, we would not expect any overhang to accommodate the flight deck to be present as of yet. If anything, at this stage of construction, we would expect the sides of the hull to be upright.
and
Overhang starts at 1st (main, hangar) or 2nd deck level, we see 3rd or 4th deck at the moment (top of machinery space, waterline or slightly above). it is to early for that conclusion.
I think it would be beneficial for all of us, for you to either acknowledge what was concluded last time, or to contest the statements we made if you disagree with them... otherwise we end up sounding like a broken record.
That said, in jaybird's post two pages back where various photos of modules at DL are present, there are some modules which look like they could be part of the overhanging sponson... but they're just too early for them to be attached.
We also now see a very large module that seems very indicative of the hangar... which is a significant difference between what we knew when we last had this conversation, compared to now. I think the large beam likely-hangar module is a very photo that adds a very large piece of likely evidence to the already large evidence and logical base suggesting this is a carrier.
