H-20 bomber (with H-X, JH-XX)

Re: PLAAF new JH-XX / H-X bomber soncepts

Wait a minute I think I've seen sino's bomber... It was in the Zapruder film right behind the grassy knoll.... Yeah that ones really sketchy. I mean either its on its side or that wing is going to need one heck of a repair job after every taxi. The shape is totally impossible from that angle.

Re: PLAAF new JH-XX / H-X bomber soncepts

As Blitzo pointed out both images are indeed the same but in the second one that small truck, which was pixelated in the first one is clearer, maybe giving a hint to the size of that thing.

Anyway it shows that this wing geometry is completely faked from this view (or it is real and the one who did that ps-job wants to give a hint) ...

Overall it is very mysterious ... either a simple dumb hoax to fool us, or indeed something real and the one who took that image want to avoid censorship by manipulating thsi image so obviously that it can be posted but on the other side with each and every additional image hints can be hidded of how that thing looks like.

Deino

Re: PLAAF new JH-XX / H-X bomber soncepts

I would be very skeptical, if not for the fact that the cjdby official blog endorsed the picture. I am willing to give it a chance. Loos like December came a little early this year.

Re: PLAAF new JH-XX / H-X bomber soncepts

Bltizo said:

did the prototype fall on its side, how can a cameraman on the ground capture that angle?

Not to mention the aircraft's tail in that pixelated photo and size etc all look completely off compared to the first original photo.

Click to expand...

Unless the wings can be folded up, no way the wings can appear that way from the same angle of shot.

Re: PLAAF new JH-XX / H-X bomber soncepts

Quickie said:

Unless the wings can be folded up, no way the wings can appear that way from the same angle of shot.

Click to expand...

The two images look weird... Just look at the person standing in front of the plane (the little dark stick figure). In the original image, the stick figure is ahead of the plane. He is actually standing some distance away from the plane, but the second image with the weird wings he is underneath the plane. But everything else in both images looks identical including another person walking and the truck, etc. simply, some of the features in the first image was hidden by some structures of the plane in the second image. The only thing that seems to have changed is the position of the little stick figure standing in front of the plane. So weird...

Re: PLAAF new JH-XX / H-X bomber soncepts

That's a good observiation, which means there is in fact no aircraft that is that long.

Deino

Re: PLAAF new JH-XX / H-X bomber soncepts

Two nice, or I would say "interestng" CGs floating around ...

By the way I would not complain if it would look like the second image (but as already said this all seems to good to be true)

Re: PLAAF new JH-XX / H-X bomber soncepts

Deino said:

Two nice, or I would say "interestng" CGs floating around ...

By the way I would not complain if it would look like the second image (but as already said this all seems to good to be true)

Click to expand...

The only problem I have with the second image is that the engine intakes look like they're under the wing roots.

Re: PLAAF new JH-XX / H-X bomber soncepts

• 
  [*=1]I just browsed through Paralay's PAK-DA collection and there are some similarities. I hope some douche is not playing with us by PSing some early PAK-DA sketches:

Re: PLAAF new JH-XX / H-X bomber soncepts

But we already have that black model from back in June 2013 (did anyone ever pin down the airshow/exhibition?).