H-20 bomber (with H-X, JH-XX)

AssassinsMace said:

Looks like the same guy who did this one.

View attachment 24632

Click to expand...

Possibly, guy is very talented and makes very nice rendition but you can tell he hasn't a clue about real world aircraft design lol. Both renditions are highly impractical for real world applications.
They would be awesome in animes and scifi shows though.

.he seems to be modifying based of real aircraft but adding his own unique stylistic signature of the dark colors, the solid band windows of a darker tone, blending the engines into the fuselage and using both over and under mounted engine intakes.

Equation said:

Still a beautiful design concept though.

Click to expand...

NO!

delft said:

NO!

Click to expand...

Yes it is!

Definitely the same guy,

via paulmm on secretprojects...

looks like a Chinese RCS study into various planforms. The one at the bottom looks quite similar to the NG release for B-21... won't it be funny if B-21 and H-20 both end up with similar planform...

Only so many ways to design a low observable subsonic medium to long range platform

Sorry if this is a noobie question, but out of those 4 platforms, which one would have the lowest RCS?

newguy02 said:

Sorry if this is a noobie question, but out of those 4 platforms, which one would have the lowest RCS?

Click to expand...

Isn't it obvious that D being the best? With a very narrow spike of -20dB at 30 degrees and the rest average at below -20dB, mostly around -25 dB.

But of course, D may not be the best in terms of aerodynamic, therefor other layouts are also studied. Which one is best overall? That is hard to say, and really depends on what PLAF want to achieve, we will have to wait and see.

I'm assuming 90 degree means side but whether 0 degree or 180 degree means front?