PLAAF H-10 bombers

Discussion in 'Air Force' started by challenge, Sep 26, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. challenge
    Offline

    challenge Banned Idiot

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2006
    Messages:
    1,662
    Likes Received:
    5
    俄罗斯军方证实;经过多年的紧张谈判,中国终于和俄罗斯达成了引进图-22M3生产线的协议,俄方同意转让全部技术资料,这标志着我国与俄罗斯就引进图-22M3生产线的谈判终于圆满的画上了句号。未来装备中国海军航空兵部队的图-22M3将命名为“轰10”。

    俄罗斯开价15亿美金。同意转让给中国一条 “图-22M3生产线,现在,西飞已经开始了紧张的试制过程,预计明年下半年能造出第一架样机。由于俄国的图-22M3已经停产多年,所以所有部件,除发 动机外,将全部由我国制造。这次西飞能够快速进入“图-22M3”“轰-10”的生产试制任务,主要得益于我国先前进口的6架图-22m3轰炸机在空军服 役的经验积累,为空军科研单位吃透“图22M3”节点技术和西飞歼轰机研制部门对“图22M3”的改进研发提供了有力的技术论证条件。据说军方定货第一批 次为12架,第二批次为24架,共计36架。

    Under $150 million agreement, Russia to provide China liscense to assemble TU-22M3 bomber.
    under the aggreement,excluding the engine,China will produced important component.
    PLAAF will also import (or lease?) 6 TU-22M3 from russia .allowing the chinese ground crews to familiar with the aircraft.
    the first production batch quoted at 12 aircrafts, second batch at 24.total 36 aircraft.
     
  2. zoom
    Offline

    zoom Junior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2010
    Messages:
    325
    Likes Received:
    0
    Can you provide the source of this story. This forum has already discussed the possibilty of such an agreement but concluded that China's interest had cooled.
    Does this include the M3 ? If so isn't that a long time to then restart production?

    Future Bomber Programme - SinoDefence.com
     
  3. Deino
    Offline

    Deino Brigadier
    Staff Member Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2005
    Messages:
    9,973
    Likes Received:
    25,990
    Sorry ... but esp. in mind of Challenger's reliability in quoting - and once again without a source !! :mad: - real New's I think this is once again nothing more than BULLS..T !

    Could You please learn and provide a link or so ... or at least start to think before You post something ?

    Deino
     
  4. challenge
    Offline

    challenge Banned Idiot

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2006
    Messages:
    1,662
    Likes Received:
    5
    ÊÀ½ç¾üÊÂÂÛ̳ - ¶íÓÐÒâÒÔ15ÒÚÃÀ½ðÏòÖйúתÈÃÄæ»ðºäÕ¨»úÉú²úÏß
     
  5. Maggern
    Offline

    Maggern Junior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2006
    Messages:
    560
    Likes Received:
    4
  6. AssassinsMace
    Offline

    AssassinsMace Brigadier

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2005
    Messages:
    7,938
    Likes Received:
    9,598
    It's posted over at the FYJS board too but it says $1.5 billion.
     
  7. A.Man
    Offline

    A.Man Major

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2009
    Messages:
    3,257
    Likes Received:
    5,003
    My Friend,

    This is a white elephant that no one wants it.

    China really don't need it.
     
  8. SteelBird
    Offline

    SteelBird Major

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    3,343
    Likes Received:
    2,615
    Well, so far as I can remember, Challenge has just come back for a vocation for one week due to unlink post. Today he does the same thing though a link is added later on. I think such a report is too much unreliable especially when it mentioned China has imported 6 BackFire before. Anyone familiar with sinodefence would know that Russia intended to sell these BackFire back to Peace-Mission 2005, however, China wasn't interested. In fact, China was more interested in the newly produced Su-34. No one did mention about any possible deal so far.
     
  9. rhino123
    Offline

    rhino123 Pencil Pusher
    VIP Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2006
    Messages:
    1,937
    Likes Received:
    179
    Challenge's usual reference is from the bullshit forum like the bbs.wforum and the strategypage. so there really is no need to pay heed to such nonsense until, unless some reputable sites or official statement are released.
     
  10. siegecrossbow
    Offline

    siegecrossbow Brigadier
    Staff Member Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    Messages:
    6,198
    Likes Received:
    8,974
    The real question is why are we still commenting on such b.s.?

    I suggest that a mod close this thread. Having such topics will tarnish Sinodefence's reputation.
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page