PLA Anti-Air Missile (SAM) systems

Discussion in 'Army' started by FORBIN, Mar 31, 2015.

  1. Iron Man
    Offline

    Iron Man Captain
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2015
    Messages:
    2,791
    Likes Received:
    2,462
    I wouldn't put too much stock into any of the numbers. I've watched alleged missile ranges creep upwards over the years on the same exact missiles without a shred of evidence to back those increases up. The S-300FM using the 48N6 missile was significantly larger than the derivative HQ-9 and only had a range of 150km, so there is no way the original HQ-9 had a range of 200km. Probably 100 to 120km for the first iteration of HQ-9 is more likely. Subsequent iterations like HHQ-9A and now the HHQ-9B have undoubtedly improved on the range, but double the range from HQ-9 to HHQ-9B? Possible, but I think evidence in the form of a company brochure or statement by credible sources would be in order here.
     
    FORBIN likes this.
  2. Totoro
    Offline

    Totoro Captain
    VIP Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,030
    Likes Received:
    769
    Missile ranges are pretty much whatever the manufacturer says they are. Two missiles with two different ranges can easily be apples and oranges.

    Case in point: Aster 30. Manufacturer says 120 km in most brochures. Then in one brochure there's a more detailed rundown where it says 120 km is against slow flying object and against a jet fighter it is more like 70 km.

    Buk family. It's made to engage fast approaching enemies and goes directly towards the threat, through shortest trajectory possible. Its range against jet fighters is in 40ish km range. It has enough kinetic potential to go farther, if guidance allows it. Buk m3 comes and it suddenly it has 70 km range. (the missile itself was changed too but not that much)

    Perhaps biggest examples are SM1 and S300 families where exactly the same missile achieved greater ranges with different trajectory use. But one needs to keep in mind that the additional range may not applicable against all target types. Fast, alerted targets may still need to be engaged through trajectories not allowing maximum range.

    S300 used the same missile and changed guidance to go from 50 km to 90 km range. Later variant of missile then started off at 150 km and is now at 250 km reach. Against *unknown* target types. Most likely slow, unalerted targets.

    Peculiarly enough, the fd2000 range of 125 km was specifically mentioned against jet aircraft in one of the manufacturer's brochures, and another one had a graphic of jet fighter drawn as the 125 km target.

    It may not mean anything but artist's liberty, of course, but it is also plausible that apples to apples reach, when compared to s300 for example, isn't 250 km vs 125 km but a different set of figures.
     
    plawolf, N00813 and antiterror13 like this.
  3. FORBIN
    Offline

    FORBIN Lieutenant General
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2013
    Messages:
    13,669
    Likes Received:
    23,043
    Aster 30 coz the Arabel radar max 100 km but it is inexact for 70 km in more he is a missile much more compact as US than Russians and Chinese or copy.
    And justely to consider max range for missiles and radars it is the true operationnal range but possible with links use the missile to max range, other point but important.

    Especialy with confidential datas and Policy about their Customers, Armies i don't trust or rarely manufacturer's datas.
     
  4. Insignius
    Offline

    Insignius Junior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    558
    Likes Received:
    815
    missile ranges can also be extended by improved trajectories. Like how the AIM-120C vs D had such a huge difference even without dual pulse motor.
     
  5. Iron Man
    Offline

    Iron Man Captain
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2015
    Messages:
    2,791
    Likes Received:
    2,462
    It is my impression that unless otherwise specified, a general "range" is going to be versus a subsonic, non-maneuvering, non-stealthy, directly inbound, fighter-sized target. Trajectory is definitely important and is one way of increasing range. However, I have not heard that either the S-300 or the HHQ-9 uses a similar semi-ballistic trajectory to the SM-2. This kind of trajectory sacrifices short range capability for more long range capability, so there is no free lunch either way.
     
  6. Hendrik_2000
    Offline

    Hendrik_2000 Brigadier

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2006
    Messages:
    5,943
    Likes Received:
    19,595
    China Army - Bohai Sea Coastal defense exercise .Explore New Model of Air Defense Operations

     
    Equation and N00813 like this.
  7. SinoSoldier
    Offline

    SinoSoldier Major

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2009
    Messages:
    3,429
    Likes Received:
    5,195
    There seems to be two variants of the LY-80: the 70-km-ranged LY-80 and the 40-km-ranged LY-80N.

    2a.jpg
     
  8. Hyperwarp
    Offline

    Hyperwarp Captain

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2007
    Messages:
    2,132
    Likes Received:
    3,764
    After some cropping,

    LY-80 (Medium range air-defense missile weapon system): Interception Range (3.5 km to 70 km), Interception Altitude (15 m - 20,000 m)
    LY-80N (Ship-borne air-defense missile weapon system): Interception Range (4 km to 40 km), Interception Altitude (7 m - 15,000 m)

    SAM1_cleaned.jpg
     
    antiterror13 likes this.
  9. antiterror13
    Offline

    antiterror13 Major

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2006
    Messages:
    3,701
    Likes Received:
    3,989
  10. Totoro
    Offline

    Totoro Captain
    VIP Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,030
    Likes Received:
    769
    This is the first official mention of the 70 km range for me. If one assumes the poster itself is from an official source. Which we don't know for sure as there's no logo or context about where image was taken.
     
Loading...
Similar Threads
  1. aikea
    Replies:
    7
    Views:
    5,865
  2. Roger604
    Replies:
    9
    Views:
    11,743
  3. MIGleader
    Replies:
    84
    Views:
    41,979
  4. hardware
    Replies:
    7
    Views:
    22,680
  5. challenge
    Replies:
    46
    Views:
    29,621

Share This Page