PLA AEW&C, SIGINT, EW and MPA thread

Discussion in 'Air Force' started by Sczepan, Nov 30, 2005.

  1. asif iqbal
    Offline

    asif iqbal Brigadier

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2006
    Messages:
    8,226
    Likes Received:
    8,266
    Hmmm samurai does have a point here
     
  2. Bltizo
    Offline

    Bltizo Lieutenant General

    Joined:
    May 15, 2008
    Messages:
    11,930
    Likes Received:
    14,434
    Not really. The KJ-500's cabin looks entirely consistent with that of the KJ-200, ZDK-03, Y-8JB in terms of dimensions and geometry.

    The only difference is the KJ-500's consoles aren't flush with the wall, but there's a simple answer explaining why that may be.
     
    mr.bean and N00813 like this.
  3. Totoro
    Offline

    Totoro Captain
    VIP Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,255
    Likes Received:
    1,022
    I would argue there's something like 8 workstations in line, in that picture. Give or take. With roughly 1.5 to 2 workstations per 2 ceiling lights. With first two ceiling lights not visible in the image. So possibly up to 10 workstations but 8 striking me as a more probable figure.
     
  4. Bltizo
    Offline

    Bltizo Lieutenant General

    Joined:
    May 15, 2008
    Messages:
    11,930
    Likes Received:
    14,434
    I think it's definitely more than 5, so I'd say 6 or more.
    10 seems unlikely, while 8 is only hanging in the edge of possible.
     
  5. by78
    Offline

    by78 Colonel

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2014
    Messages:
    4,053
    Likes Received:
    22,337
    From March of this year...

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    PanAsian, mr.bean, jobjed and 4 others like this.
  6. Hyperwarp
    Offline

    Hyperwarp Captain

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2007
    Messages:
    2,447
    Likes Received:
    4,471
    Deino and Yodello like this.
  7. Totoro
    Offline

    Totoro Captain
    VIP Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,255
    Likes Received:
    1,022
    I wonder if there's any logic that can be used to deduce which of those planes are newly built, which are older airframes that are moved around and which could be older planes that have been sent to factory for refurbishment. Simply counting airframes that have moved position or airframes of new type/color yields over 15 a year. But double counting is a serious risk there, so it'd be great if we had more info...
     
  8. Bltizo
    Offline

    Bltizo Lieutenant General

    Joined:
    May 15, 2008
    Messages:
    11,930
    Likes Received:
    14,434
    I don't think there's any way of determining that, though considering how recently produced most KJ-500s (among other Y-9 variants) have been, and considering how we haven't seen much evidence of past Y-8/9 special mission aircraft returning to factory for refurbishment, I would suspect few if any of the airframes we see are existing in service aircraft there for refurbishment.


    There is also some noise that Shaanxi should have quite a high rate of production of Y-9 airframes. I wouldn't be too surprised if it turns out that our estimates for new Y-9 airframes may have been underestimated in the last couple of years
     
  9. Totoro
    Offline

    Totoro Captain
    VIP Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,255
    Likes Received:
    1,022
    Even a 15 airframes per year rate is a huge one, though. That's a fleet of 150 planes in a decade. China today doesn't seem to have 150 Y8/9 class planes in total, counting ALL the transport and special mission variants. If such a rate is applied and if it's kept over a long period, in a few decades we might be looking at a fleet of ~500 Y8/9 class planes. For comparison, US military currently has some 670 C130/P3/P8 platforms of all kinds.
     
  10. Bltizo
    Offline

    Bltizo Lieutenant General

    Joined:
    May 15, 2008
    Messages:
    11,930
    Likes Received:
    14,434
    That suspected higher rate of production only began in the last few years.

    But yes, you're certainly right that the PLA is building their tactical airlift fleet and special mission Gaoxin fleet (AEW&C, MPA, ELINT/SIGINT, EW etc) from a relatively low preexisting fleet number. But that's also the case for many categories of PLA equipment. Over the course of a decade and a bit the PLA went from no AEW&C aircraft to having a fleet of currently ~30 (and growing) medium/large AEW&C aircraft. I'm sure I don't need to describe the PLAN's procurement of modern destroyers and frigates, or the PLAAF's procurement of fighter aircraft capable of BVR.


    I'm not sure how many Y-9 airframes they'll end up having in service (i.e.: what their "goal" or "critical mass" is), but yeah, over a few decades the idea of 500 Y-9 class airframes seems sensible and commensurate with the kind of military that the PLA is seeking to build. It doesn't sound particularly outrageous to me. Perhaps the only slightly difficult to comprehend part is the idea of Y-9s continuing to be produced for multiple decades. Sustaining production of up to 20 airframes a year for a decade and a half should be sufficient before moving onto a different set of airframes for the tactical airlift and special mission purpose, but that's nitpicking.
     
    Yodello and KIENCHIN like this.

Share This Page