Russian Su-57 Aircraft Thread (PAK-FA and IAF FGFA)

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
pak_fa_t_50_compressor_stall_on_maks_2011_0.jpg

Russian testing of Vodka as alternative for Jet fuel proved problematic.... JK.:D
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

March 10, 2017

Russia’s Sukhoi T-50 PAK-FA stealth fighter program has suffered another delay. Testing of the of the powerful new jet’s second stage engine, which was supposed to start later this year, has been pushed back to 2018.

"At the moment, works are being carried out within the framework of contacts with the Russian Defense Ministry,” United Aircraft Corporation, Sergei Korotkov told the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. “Flight tests are underway. We plan to enter the second stage of trials next year."

The new engine was expected to make its first flight installed onboard the PAK-FA in the fourth quarter of 2017. "The first flight of the aircraft with the new engine is expected in the fourth quarter of 2017," a United Engine Corporation
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
earlier in the year.

The next-generation Saturn izdeliye 30—sometime referred to as the izdeliye 129—are the engines for the T-50. There are few details available about the izdeliye 30 engines, but the new powerplant is expected to deliver
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
of afterburning thrust.

With the new engine installed, the PAK-FA should be able to offer kinematic performance comparable to the Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor—cruising without afterburner at speeds exceeding Mach 1.5 with a maximum speed greater than Mach 2.0 at altitudes of around 60,000ft. “Performance-wise it certainly looks to compete with the Raptor,” one senior military official with extensive experience on U.S. fifth-generation fighters
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

Overall, while the Russians place less emphasis on stealth while focusing more on maneuverability and raw kinematic performance, the new Sukhoi-built jet appears to have a comprehensive suite of avionics. “The analysis that I have seen on the PAK-FA indicates a pretty sophisticated design that is at least equal to, and some have said even superior to U.S. fifth-generation aircraft,” former U.S. Air Force intelligence chief Lt. Gen. Dave Deptula
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. “It certainly has greater agility with its combination of thrust vectoring, all moving tail surfaces, and excellent aerodynamic design, than does the F-35.”

But while the Russians have
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
(AESA) radars, infrared sensors and excellent electronic warfare systems, one of the big questions that remain is how well the Russians have integrated the jets’ avionics. It took the United States decades of effort and billions of dollars to develop the complex integrated avionics suite and sophisticated pilot vehicle interfaces that make the Raptor the fearsome weapon that it is.

Ultimately, the Russians will probably be able to resolve technical glitches with the PAK-FA and field a capable operational aircraft. There is little doubt about that. The real question is when that will happen and how many jets the Kremlin can afford to buy.

Dave Majumdar is the defense editor for The National Interest
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator

This thing is even more gorgeous than the Flanker if that's possible,,,,kinda snarky like the movie "FireFox"! Not just "girl next door looks" and folks, pretty airplanes sell, just bad management on both teams have kept the Indians from buy/building a "krap-load" of these things???

and I love those twin drogue chutes as on the J-20, I loved seeing those chutes pop as a kid, and then they taxi in and drop them in a given spot and that's kool all over....
 
according to Jane's
Russian MoD to receive three T-50 fifth-gen fighters among aircraft deliveries in 2017
The Komsomolsk-on-Amur Aviation Plant (KnAAZ: a subsidiary of Sukhoi) will deliver three T-50 (PAK FA) fifth-generation multirole fighters to Russia's Ministry of Defence (MoD) in 2017, Deputy Defence Minister Yuri Borisov said on 9 March during a working trip to the Far East and Siberia.

"The work on the T-50 aircraft will be continued and three aircraft will be built. They will join the final level of the first stage of trials," Borisov said, adding that "the planned trials programme is a continuous one".

The official pointed out that the first level of trials of the T-50 are due to be finished in 2018 and that serial production of the aircraft under Russia's new rearmament programme can only be discussed after its completion.
... and I don't have an access to the rest of the source which is
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

could be fun to compare what Russian spin doctors were saying like two years ago :)
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Full tech transfer could derail Indo-Russian fifth-gen fighter program
By: Vivek Raghuvanshi, March 16, 2017
NEW DELHI — The Indo-Russian fifth-generation fighter aircraft under joint development and production by the two countries has taken a hit, with Russia showing reluctance to fully transfer the aircraft technology, particularly stealth capabilities, despite repeated reminders, according to a top Indian Air Force official.

After the preliminary agreement on the particulars of the fifth-generation fighter aircraft (FGFA) program in 2010, and with both sides having paid $295 million each, the final agreement that enables India to release more than $4 billion, is pending.

The Air Force has worked out its requirements for the FGFA, but the crucial "work sharing and technology sharing draft has yet to be finalized," the IAF official said.

"The project is likely to get delayed further unless the issue of transfer of technology is finalized," offered Daljit Singh, a defense analyst and retired Indian Air Force air marshal. India should insist on technology transfer in specified fields, he added, as "full technology transfer may not be feasible."

Another retiree from the Air Force agreed. "Full technology transfer is not possible since the aviation industrial base in India is not at par with that in Russia," said Vijainder K Thakur, a defense analyst and former squadron leader.

An Indian Ministry of Defence official said the FGFA would be a joint project and that all technologies should be worked on together. The official would not provide further information.

Konstantin Makienko, the deputy director at the Moscow-based Centre for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies, said: "The joint project means that the both sides develop the technologies together and become equal owners of them. Therefore it is not about the technology transfer but a joint use of them."

The Air Force is insisting that an agreement for joint development of the FGFA be reached at the earliest, lest the production of the aircraft be delayed. Any delay "would have serious cascading effect on production of the aircraft for India," Singh said.

India has a requirement for 120-130 of such swing-role planes with stealth features for increased survivability, advanced avionics, smart weapons, top-end mission computers and 360-degree situational awareness, the Air Force official noted, adding that "the ability to supercruise or sustain supersonic speeds in combat configuration without kicking in fuel-guzzling afterburners is a key Indian requirement."

For the most part, officials and analysts share a common view that a delay the final FGFA agreement is unlikely to shelve the entire program.

"It's unlikely that an in-principle agreement between Russian and Indian heads of government would be shelved. If India is unhappy with the extent of technology transfer, it would likely resort to a straightforward, albeit limited, buy, as happened in the case of the Rafale deal [with France]. Doors would be kept open for enhancing the scope of the deal at a later date," Thakur said.

The Air Force official pointed out that India has worked out operational needs for the FGFA, which the service says could differ from those of the Russians in some aspects. Russia has already moved ahead with its own research and development of the FGFA.

Russia is doing very well with its version of the FGFA, which is called the T-50. The first flight of the T-50 took place in 2010.

In addition, Russia said it will fly the T-50 with the Product 30 engine, giving it Mach 1.5 supercruise, by 2020.

The Indian Air Force wants technology transfer for the FGFA from Russia because it is facing difficulties in the Russian Sukhoi Su-30MKI aircraft due to no availability of spares and technology transfer. India has contracted 272 Su-30MKI aircraft and is license producing the same at state-owned Hindustan Aeronautics Limited facilities.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
It's time for India to start on their own 5th gen fighter program. I know it's expensive and could take a decade or two to do everything from scratch.
hate to sound like a troll but a decade or two? This is India.... best to find another program and try to make a serious investment. There is the KF-X/IF-X ROK/Indonesia program and TAI TFX from Turkey. out of the two I would lay better odds on the KF-X due to Pakistan Turk relations.
 

FactsPlease

Junior Member
Registered Member
hate to sound like a troll but a decade or two? This is India.... best to find another program and try to make a serious investment. There is the KF-X/IF-X ROK/Indonesia program and TAI TFX from Turkey. out of the two I would lay better odds on the KF-X due to Pakistan Turk relations.
Not trolling. But how do you know that Indonesia can be more counted on, for India, since they also support quite Pakistan & Muslim claims - e.g. Kashmir and Palestine. I do know that the opposition party of Indonesia had raised strong concern toward KF-X just because of the relationship between S Korea and USA. Moreoever, I witnessed with my own eyes about Indonesian's hate (common people!!) toward how western (mainly Australian) "invade" their sovereignty.
Just quick feedback and thought.
 
Top