Operational use of LR-AAMs in aerial combat - Interceptor role

Discussion in 'World Armed Forces' started by Air Force Brat, Mar 13, 2017.

  1. Air Force Brat
    Offline

    Air Force Brat Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    6,046
    Likes Received:
    6,652
    No doubt a tanker or an AWACs might be a tempting target,,,,, but you've got to get closer than you want to, and the US will vigorously defend those assets, so I just don't get all this "hoopla", at least we do have tankers, and we have AWAC's. The J-20's will have to come from somewhere, and they have to "show up somewhere in order to launch weapons at our assets??

    Its not a complicated picture if you are on alert, and we really have no idea how effective anyone's stealth is or isn't except our own. With our own 5th gens running a screen, and powerful radars overlapping coverage??? So granted these aircraft are very capable, and possibly L/O, that just makes defense a little tougher!

    The J-20 is a land based aircraft, it does not have the mobility of the F-35B or F-35C, or for that matter the F-35A, or F-22 which may meet those tankers anywhere over a vast expanse of territory???
     
    bruceb1959 and Miragedriver like this.
  2. Air Force Brat
    Offline

    Air Force Brat Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    6,046
    Likes Received:
    6,652
    As Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, and now Barack Hussein Obama have proven beyond a shadow of any doubting, US weakness is "ALWAYS" capitalized on by our adversaries large and small??? So the Trump team is sending a message, we are on duty, we can and will operate anywhere its legal and expedient or even convenient, we will maintain our decorum and our discipline, and we "strongly suggest" you do likewise??

    We're not looking for trouble, we have no problem with you developing your own "defensive weapons", because we don't intend to take anything that's not ours, but if you choose to act in a belligerent, un-neighborly manner, there will be negative consequences.
     
  3. Blackstone
    Online

    Blackstone Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2012
    Messages:
    4,851
    Likes Received:
    4,304
    What if... China develops a stealthy, extended-range anti-AWAC/Air Tanker cruise missile just to disrupt US kill chain?
     
    bruceb1959 likes this.
  4. weig2000
    Online

    weig2000 Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2012
    Messages:
    473
    Likes Received:
    1,150
    Is the above a question or a definite statement expressing a strong opinion? I'm confused by the multiple questions marks.
     
    Air Force Brat likes this.
  5. TerraN_EmpirE
    Online

    TerraN_EmpirE Tyrant King

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2005
    Messages:
    8,853
    Likes Received:
    6,850
    The Raptor and Lightning II I would argue were designed to counter antiAEW platforms. If you study there data links and radar they have exceptional powerful AESA systems and Stealthy data links. They are often called mini awacs platforms. That is I believe as they were intended to push forward beyond air denial zones well Awacs and tankers hang back in the defensive zone with more conventional fighters flying escort. Of course the problem then is feeding the hungry ninjas (F22,F35). Which is where Stealthy and or unmanned tanker concepts come in.
     
    Air Force Brat likes this.
  6. Blackstone
    Online

    Blackstone Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2012
    Messages:
    4,851
    Likes Received:
    4,304
    Do the F-22 and F-35 also carry thousands of gallons JP5 too?
     
    Air Force Brat likes this.
  7. TerraN_EmpirE
    Online

    TerraN_EmpirE Tyrant King

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2005
    Messages:
    8,853
    Likes Received:
    6,850
    No they don't.
    because neither run on JP5 the US Military standard fuel is JP8.
    F22 carries 2,686.5 gallons internally or 3,880.5 with external tanks. F35A carries 2,760 gallons of JP8 internally, B 1,988 internally and C 2,989 gallons of JP8 for comparison F15 internal is 2.008 gallons F16 is 1,044 internal and FA18C is 1,620 gallons. so do they carry thousands of Gallons of Aviation fuel? Yes yes they do.
     
    Equation likes this.
  8. Blackstone
    Online

    Blackstone Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2012
    Messages:
    4,851
    Likes Received:
    4,304
    And what happens when the air tankers carrying JP8 fail to meet the F-22 and 35 on their way back to base? Do they have buddy tanks to transfer fumes to each other?
     
  9. TerraN_EmpirE
    Online

    TerraN_EmpirE Tyrant King

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2005
    Messages:
    8,853
    Likes Received:
    6,850
    you don't even bother to read posts any more do you?
     
    Equation and Air Force Brat like this.
  10. Iron Man
    Offline

    Iron Man Senior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2015
    Messages:
    1,260
    Likes Received:
    1,190
    Not sure why you're arguing here, since what I'm saying is that neither tankers nor AWACS are invulnerable. On the face of it, this is something that is not even remotely possible for you to deny. Given that they are not invulnerable, they are susceptible to attack. Again, they will certainly be well-defended by a myriad of fighter escorts, but the exact details of these hypothetical engagements and their likely outcomes are unknown to the BOTH of us.

    As for "mobility" I'm not sure what you mean here. Certainly the J-20's unrefueled range is going to be greater than the F-35, and possibly greater than the F-22 as well. And we are talking about a hypothetical engagement involving the US ATTACKING China (since when would China ever be attacking the US in any realistic scenario given the current balance of power???), and trying to penetrate inland to soft targets. This is where the J-20s would come in, to try and deny the USAF and USN its legs (tankers) and its eyes (AWACS) and confine US air assets to the littorals or even beyond.
     
Loading...

Share This Page