North Korea to increase 'Military Deterent'.

Kampfwagen

Junior Member
SEOUL, South Korea - North Korea vowed Sunday to increase its "military deterrent" to cope with what it called U.S. attempts to provoke war, amid signs the country was preparing to test a long-range missile that could reach the continental United States.

In Washington, President Bush's spokesman said the United States expected North Korea to maintain a self-imposed freeze on testing long-range missiles. That moratorium was announced in 1999.

"We hope there's not going to be a launch," Tony Snow said.

Meanwhile, Japan said it would file a "fierce" protest and seek an immediate U.N. Security Council meeting if the North test-fires what is believed to be a Taepodong-2 missile.

There was no mention of a missile in a report from North Korea's official media on a national meeting marking the anniversary of leader Kim Jong Il starting work in the country's communist party.

North Korea has not fired a long-range missile since August 1998, when it sent a rocket flying over parts of Japanese territory in a launch that shocked the region.

But signs of a launch have grown in recent days, with reports saying a missile has been assembled at a launch pad on the North's eastern coast and may have been fueled for launch.

"There are signs" of a missile launch, Jung Tae-ho, a spokesman at the South Korean president's office, told The Associated Press, without elaborating. He said security officials were "closely watching the situation."

South Korea's Yonhap news agency, citing a South Korean government official, reported that the weather around the North Korean launch site was bad, indicating the North may not fire its missile Sunday.

Satellite weather images posted on the Web site of the South's Korea Meteorological Administration showed clouds around the launch site in northeastern North Korea as of early evening.

A missile launch "depends a lot on weather conditions," a South Korean intelligence official told The Associated Press. A nighttime launch is considered unlikely.

Japanese Foreign Minister Taro Aso said his country would not immediately resort to arms if North Korea fires a missile but would take the issue to the United Nations.

"We will naturally file a stern protest and it will be fierce," Aso said on TV Asahi, adding that the North would gain nothing from the test.

Aso also reportedly said it would be "inevitable" that the Security Council would consider imposing sanctions on Pyongyang if it goes ahead with the missile launch.

Speaking on Fuji TV, Aso said Tokyo could impose sanctions on the North in the event a missile launch because that would violate Pyongyang's commitment to impose a moratorium on such tests.

At the North Korean national meeting Sunday, officials talked about increasing the North's "military deterrent" — a phrase commonly used by the country to refer to its nuclear program, which Pyongyang contends it needs for a defense to a possible U.S. attack. Washington denies any intention to invade.

"The (North) Korean army and people will do their best to increase the military deterrent with sharp vigilance to cope with the moves of the U.S., which is hell-bent on provocations for war of aggression on the DPRK, resorting to its anti-DPRK policy, and its followers Japan and other bellicose forces," said Choe Thae Bok, secretary of the Central Committee of the Workers' Party of Korea, according to the Korean Central News Agency.

DPRK refers to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, the North's official name.

"If the enemies ignite a war eventually, the Korean army and people will mercilessly wipe out the aggressors and give vent to the deep-rooted grudge of the nation," Choe said.

The United States and Japan have confirmed that the assembly of what is believed to be a Taepodong-2 missile has been completed with two stages at the launch site, based on photos from satellites, Japan's largest daily, the Yomiuri newspaper, reported Sunday.

The Taepodong-2 missile is believed to be the North's most advanced model with the capability to reach the United States with a light payload.

The paper also said it appeared North Korea has begun filling the missile with fuel, citing unidentified U.S. government officials who conveyed information Saturday to the Japanese government through unofficial channels.

Yonhap, citing diplomatic sources in Washington, also reported there was a possibility the missile already may have been fueled, with satellite photos showing tens of fuel tanks at the launch site.

The missile concerns come amid an extended impasse at the six-nation talks on the North's nuclear weapons program. The talks — involving the United States, the two Koreas, China, Japan and Russia — were last held in November.

"We expect them to come back to the table. We do not want to have a missile test out of North Korea," Snow told "Fox News Sunday."

The North has claimed it has a nuclear weapon, but it is not believed to have a design that would be small and light enough to place on top of a missile.

___

Associated Press reporters Bo-mi Lim and Kwang-tae Kim in Seoul and Chisaki Watanabe in Tokyo contributed to this report.
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
Kampfwagen, When you post an article like this one(unless this was a news thread) you need to state your position on it. Thank you

Personally I do not know what N. Korea has "up it's sleeve". I do think they do have a missile capable of reaching the west coast of the US. I saw on the news that they be developing a missile that could reach to Chicago.

I do not expect any sort of military reaction from the US if indeed N.Korea launches this ICBM. Expect the US and it's allies to fire it's usaul retoric at N. Korea.
 

Undead Yogurt

New Member
It's only the latest ploy by Kim Jong-il to "encourage" America and the rest of the world to offer generous economic incentives to "freeze" its nuclear program. Everyone is fully aware that the sole aim of the NK regime at this point is survival via the preservation of the status quo, and so it is extremely unlikely that it will actually do something stupid like attack anyone.
 

Kampfwagen

Junior Member
Well, Popeye, as good an idea as that is, I currently dont have a position on it. Because to me, it sounds like more military feather-fluffing from Kim Jong Il. Besides, I dont want to sound like an idiot when I have nothing to offer and would rather just let you all think of it.

So sorry. But I dont want to set something off.
 
D

Deleted member 675

Guest
Undead Yogurt said:
It's only the latest ploy by Kim Jong-il to "encourage" America and the rest of the world to offer generous economic incentives to "freeze" its nuclear program.

Has anyone noticed that North Korea is extremely good at playing people? It makes vague promises, scoops up the goodies and then says it can't or won't make good on its side of the bargain. An example of this would be the train-links, which suddenly now NK can't agree to.

Perhaps we (well, the US and Japan) should just call Pyongyang's bluff and offer it nothing.......
 

Kampfwagen

Junior Member
Ten to one says we will not, just because the U.S has had a way of apeasing North Korea rather than oposing them. Everything done there is usualy on North Korea's terms. I know I probably don't need to say this, but Kim Jong Il gets away with murder, Figuratively and Literaly.
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
Kampfwagen said:
Ten to one says we will not, just because the U.S has had a way of apeasing North Korea rather than oposing them. Everything done there is usualy on North Korea's terms. I know I probably don't need to say this, but Kim Jong Il gets away with murder, Figuratively and Literaly.

Absolutley!...Remember the USS Pueblo incident?

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


N. Korea held US sailors for almost a year with no retaliation by the US.

I can't remember the year but I know there was an incident where the N.Koreans killed an US Army officer..

I do not know why the US did not retaliate against the North in both cases. It remains an mystery.

As for Kim Jong Il He knows he can say or do almost anything. Basiclly strutting around like a proud peacock. He knows he can probally blackmail the rest of the world with his BS....He is playing a game as was pointed out to get what he needs..
 

DPRKUnderground

Junior Member
I find this funny. If North Korea tests this by putting it into Japanese skies, it would just be a good oppurtunity for Japan to test its missile defense. It would be like,'That's a nice toy, but mine is even nicer!' It's also funny to see that the West and many other powers in the region are afraid of poorly trained soldiers who operate antique equipment that should be in a museum. Just look at their navy! :roll:
 

Finn McCool

Captain
Registered Member
bd popeye said:
Absolutley!...Remember the USS Pueblo incident?

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


N. Korea held US sailors for almost a year with no retaliation by the US.

I can't remember the year but I know there was an incident where the N.Koreans killed an US Army officer..

I do not know why the US did not retaliate against the North in both cases. It remains an mystery.

The US didn't think it was worth upsetting the Cold War balance over. Think about it. North Korea, China and the USSR all right there together. The last thing the US needed to do was to add a CBG air-striking NK into the Sea of Japan, right of Vladivostok. No way. The US made the right choice there.

This is just typical Kim-Jong Il bluster. The last time something really dangerous happened in the Korean Peninsula was when the NK Navy and the SK navy battled each other for a few weeks back in 2000. (I think it was 2000) As to a possible missle test, I think that it will provide the perfect evidence the USAF and JSDF need to justify their joint missle defence system.
 

walter

Junior Member
DPRKUnderground said:
I find this funny. If North Korea tests this by putting it into Japanese skies, it would just be a good oppurtunity for Japan to test its missile defense. It would be like,'That's a nice toy, but mine is even nicer!' It's also funny to see that the West and many other powers in the region are afraid of poorly trained soldiers who operate antique equipment that should be in a museum. Just look at their navy! :roll:

This thought occured to me, as well, but I doubt they would attempt a shoot down of the NK missle just because if they (US or Japan) fail it would be a huge scandal--and the chances of any missle defense system failing are quite high, that is just fact. If after billions upon billions of $$$ spent on these systems they fail once in a real world situation the public outcry would be quite loud. It would just make a bad situation (NK Launching a missle) even worse (missle defence fails). I think the govt. of both the US and Japan would let the NK missle fall into the sea rather than risking further development and funding cuts and giving Kim the satisfaction of having a relatively cheap missle defeat an exorbitantly expenisive missle defense system.

Of course if either the govts. of Japan or US actually thought the missle would be targeted at Japan or elsewhere, as opposed to just falling harmlessly into the sea, then they would be obligated to try and shoot it down. That is in this case, however, probably not the case.
 
Top