News on China's scientific and technological development.

SamuraiBlue

SamuraiBlue

Captain
manqiangrexue said:
Apparently, you don't even have to do that now either, but even if you did, so what? So they can cool both points to 4K. So what's your point? Why did you bring up the temperature? Does that somehow detract from the feat that was accomplished?
Click to expand...
Shows you never actually read the linked articles and have no knowledge of the particular science at hand.
Also shows you can't stand losing face even if you are completely wrong.
In that aspect I respect vesicles's attitude where he posts his admittance of mistake when corrected.
 
manqiangrexue

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
SamuraiBlue said:
Shows you never actually read the linked articles and have no knowledge of the particular science at hand.
Also shows you can't stand losing face even if you are completely wrong.
In that aspect I respect vesicles's attitude where he posts his admittance of mistake when corrected.
Click to expand...
LOLOLOL No no no no don't try that crap. You don't talk to other people about losing when you mistook the "launch" of a new project with a launch into space and stuck with it for 3 pages.

Let me convey upon you how low your credibility is. You are wrong so often then when I see you write a paragraph about something that I know nothing about, deep down, I can tell that you're wrong. And when challenged, it's proven that you were, in fact, wrong. That's how bad your track record is. I would never even think about doubting another member like that because no one has BS flowing out of his ears like you do... except maybe Janiz (whose mistakes are as embarrassing as yours but they're less frequent).

You had no reason at all to bring up the temperature. You claimed to be following quantum entanglement since your school days but did not even know that it no longer required cryogenic temperatures. To be honest, it's not even really possible for me to be wrong because I never made a claim. You claimed that it required a certain temperature. I never said that it didn't because I don't know about it and I said that in my post, but because you are always wrong, I required you to show sources. You showed 3 from 2009-11 that MAY support what you said, but does not prove it. Then, Vesicles came out with a newer article that showed that you're wrong yet again. 1 more for your wet noodle track record. Now I ask you why you ever brought it up and you don't even know. (From drinking Fukushima water?)The point was moot to begin with. You're so desperate to win an argument you're making them up.
 
Last edited:
manqiangrexue

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
SamuraiBlue said:
I can't read Chinese.
Click to expand...
1. Don't comment on shit you can't read.
2. What part of this is in Chinese?
Hendrik_2000 said:
Chinese Academy of Sciences: will launch the world's first mini nuclear power treasure"
2016-10-07 05:46:53 94 ℃

CCTV news:Before the day, China's lead based fast reactor research and development work has made a major breakthrough, lead based reactor core technology to achieve autonomy, and among the world's leading level. Continue to use this technology, the future, China will take the lead in the introduction of only the size of the container Mini nuclear power plant".

Identified by the expert group, designed by the Research Institute of research and development of nuclear safety technology of the world's largest and most versatile "lead based integrated experimental reactor coolant loop technology" and "lead based reactor coolant oxygen measurement and control technology, and the ability of operating parameters has reached the international advanced level, the core technology of autonomy.

The coolant is equivalent to the nuclear reactor of "blood", alloy based metal lead as coolant, instead of the traditional water coolant in nuclear power station, it is currently considered one of the safest nuclear facilities cooling material, it can not only avoid serious disasters like the Fukushima nuclear power plant, but also can be used for nuclear the rate of fuel resources is extended to the Millennium level. Therefore, the lead based reactor can be used in the fourth generation nuclear power, the future of fusion power plants, etc., and can play a role in the field of desalination and other industrial production, thus promoting the development of clean energy.

According to reports, the Chinese Academy of Sciences Research on nuclear safety technology and engineering experiment system is verified on the lead based reactor, and plans to take the lead in the world to develop nuclear power plant "mini sized nuclear power container only treasure, to meet the ocean platform, remote areas of distributed power supply demand.
Click to expand...
3. Stop embarrassing yourself. It's like watching your mouth fall down the stairs. Just stop
 
manqiangrexue

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
SamuraiBlue said:
This is the post I responded to.
https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/ne...ogical-development.t4270/page-325#post-456613
I don't speak the language either.
Click to expand...
First of all, you're acting like it's ok to post stupid, wrong information because you couldn't read/understand the topic. If you can't understand what's being said cus it's in a different language, then you need to shut up. Or you can ask a question: "Hey, guys, I can't understand what's being said but is this reactor going to be launched into space? No? OK, thanks for the info." See how pleasant that was compared to being embarrassed for 5 pages?

Secondly, how about all of these? After Hendrix posted the translation and multiple warnings from several members that told you in English that there was no space launch, you posted:
SamuraiBlue said:
You guys don't get it, do you.
I'm not really that worried about possible nuclear leakage in orbit. That is not going to do us any harm. The problem with launching a nuclear reactor with a rocket is the real possibility of rocket failure resulting for the reactor falling out of the sky. This is the main concern which got everybody concerned and to my knowledge no nation had ever launched one before.

Basically you guys are launching a dirty bomb since anything in earth orbit will eventually fall back to earth. Bllasting it before it reaches back is not an option either since the reactor would be a chunk a metal that would not burn up during reentry .
Click to expand...
SamuraiBlue said:
Jealousy??
Of what?
I wouldn't condone this and actively condemn this kind of utter foolish and irresponsible act in the name of science by any government.
Will call them what they are "Complete FOOLS" because they are launching a dirty bomb that will eventually fall back to earth that will not burn up during reentry because the reactor core is going to be a shield the heat.
Anyone with even with just elementary knowledge of science will tell you that.
Click to expand...
SamuraiBlue said:
Envy???
You must be smoking something not allowed!!
Where in the world would you envy a plan that could and may become the worst nuclear disaster, branded as a nation that launches a dirty bomb into orbit?
Basically solar panels can generate enough power to power up most all electrical equipment unlike the past.
Rocket science can and will fail in the past, in the present and, in the future thinking it will not shows arrogance towards nature/or the limit of humans.
Click to expand...
Can't change history here, bub.
 
Last edited:
SamuraiBlue

SamuraiBlue

Captain
Looks as if someone is des
manqiangrexue said:
First of all, you're acting like it's ok to post stupid, wrong information because you couldn't read/understand the topic. If you can't understand what's being said cus it's in a different language, then you need to shut up. Or you can ask a question: "Hey, guys, I can't understand what's being said but is this reactor going to be launched into space? No? OK, thanks for the info." See how pleasant that was compared to being embarrassed for 5 pages?

Secondly, how about all of these? After Hendrix posted the translation and multiple warnings from several members that told you in English that there was no space launch, you posted:



Can't change history here, bub.
Click to expand...
You are only smearing your own face further by being persistent.
 
manqiangrexue

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
SamuraiBlue said:
Looks as if someone is des

You are only smearing your own face further by being persistent.
Click to expand...
Smear my face with your blood LOL. You've got nothing to say, proven wrong too many times to count in a single argument, and now you're not even making sense. What a shit way to start the weekend for you, getting demolished in public for your BS... If this were 300 years ago, it'd be time for you to sharpen up that sushi knife for hara kiri.
 
Last edited:
Blitzo

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
SamuraiBlue said:
Looks as if someone is des

You are only smearing your own face further by being persistent.
Click to expand...

I won't comment on the immediate discussion about quantum entanglement, but I will say that your previous instance of somehow believing China was going to send a nuclear reactor into space is just ridiculous given the multiple articles in English that were there as well as the fact that the very idea of sending a nuclear reactor into space should never have passed the smell test to begin with.


The fact that you are continuing to defend your mistake as if it was somehow reasonable will only further degrade any credibility you may seek to retain for future discussions.
It is not the best look to admit a silly mistake, but it is an even worse look to persistently defend a silly mistake with the air of suggesting it is reasonable. If you admit you misread it or misinterpreted it then you'll be able to move on and others who may want to skewer you with your mistake will be mostly disarmed. But by continuing to try and justify your mistake you're just giving other them more arrows.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top