Yeah but the tank or crew might be cripple to some extent no longer combat effective.
It takes a lot to get a 50-60 ton vehicle to move enough to generate the G forces needed to actually hurt the crew. MBT especially of the Third generation in the last decade have been retrofit or built new with lots of shock absorption systems to mediate impacts on the crew.
From the seating to the clothing worn. Tank crews have survived roll overs and near direct hits with high caliber artillery.
Tanks of Russian/Warsaw pact design have there crews fight sealed up inside there tanks, Ztz99's Hatches seem to be following that design, I base this on the way the hatch sits when open and that the commanders have been seen placing the open hatch forward in combat that can allow the commander to sit raised in the turret and use the hatch as makeshift body armor covering there chest.
Western Tanks are a little different on that commanders placing more of an emphasis on situational awareness and only sealing for NBC but the hatches of the Turrets are designed with three modes open, low protected where the hatch sits raised but over the opening and the TC can look out around him. The hatch being designed not to fall or swing around accidentally depending on design, and closed.
In both cases though the aim is to limit the amount of secondary fragmentation from entering the fighting compartment.
Really because of the armor levels and fact that MBT are taking there design linage from the era of the cold war where these tanks were supposed to be dealing with the potential of a nuclear level shock wave and over pressure, short of a direct hit driving over a massive bomb or a near blast of a even more massive bomb I just don't think it's really going to get the Tank in a position where it is no longer able to fight. And under artillery the best defense for the Tank crew is speed. Unless you are raining down Railway gun artillery a miss is not likely to knock out the tank. a direct hit on a tank from over 20 miles is a literal long shot.
