*New J-10 Thread*

Status
Not open for further replies.

MIGleader

Banned Idiot
skyhawk2005 said:
Yes these are wild guesses on your part.

I really really doubt your guesses are correct.

China's cutting edge is the J10, not F22. You make it sound like it's easy to build #2 or #3. China's not there yet.

Most likely, China's stealthy version of J10 will be #1, and that will take 5 years.

#1 seems very likely, but im not quite sure about #2. I havnt ever heard of the PLAAF developing such a plane, and they have not ordered any engines for it yet, so its still a few years away.

The 2015 deadline for #3...Well, the f-22 took 14 years from flight to service. But its developemnt wasnt really in a hurry, and it could have entered service in 2000 if really needed. If China does not wish to wait that long, it doesnt have to. but four years is reasonable enough time for evaluations. assuming no major setbacks occur, 2015 seems liek a good time for a few initial production models to enter service.

Where is the j-xx now? your guess is as good as mine. lets see...Typhuand said it entered wind tunnel testing in 2003. j-10 entered wind tunnel testing in 1993, and flew first in 1998(confirmed...). so we should see the j-xx fly in 2008, which is what i hear alot.
 
Last edited:

maglomanic

Junior Member
SABRE said:
Incase u havent noticed. JF-17 has not been marketed to poorer countries. Considering the PT-4, even BD said they would want the downgraded version (probably based on PT-2 or PT-3). PAC is marketing it in ME countries, including Saudi Arabia to replace their F-5 series. They are not poor.

You are not entirely correct to assume that. First of all We saw news that there problems with the prototype that flew and thats whychanges were made. Then i have read interview of cheif engineer saying that prtotype 4 is going to be the baseline after it flys.

Now looking at Nigeria's F-7 deal (16.6 million dollars per plane)
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Then that contradicts the assupmtion that third world countries cannot afford FC-1 which is going to be between 15-20 million dollars.

The only way customers can probably bring down the price of purchase is by making compromise on avionics suite and FBW redundancy.

Think like this. Bangladesh doesnt need a more multirole aircraft like the one Pakistan wants (CAS,airsupriroity, antiship). They can split between a plane that is dedicated to airsuprioity, CAS and one for antishipping role. Or they don't have to pay for integration of weapons system like Pakistan (Pakistan will be integrating most of it's munitions inlcuding H2/H4).

I don't see why Bangladesh won't be able to afford FC-1 in it's 04 guise and with more mature technologies costing mere 15-20 million dollars.
 

maglomanic

Junior Member
skyhawk2005 said:
Yes these are wild guesses on your part.

I really really doubt your guesses are correct.

China's cutting edge is the J10, not F22. You make it sound like it's easy to build #2 or #3. China's not there yet.

Most likely, China's stealthy version of J10 will be #1, and that will take 5 years.

Skyhawk,

Tphuang's guess regarding two differnt types might be something that we cannot verify or decide on now, but saying China is not there yet is an understatement. If you look at the one then he is probably talking about Super-10 reported by Janes. I would not be surprise if that plane makes flight in 2006. I think it might not be out of league to expect DSI on it given that CAC did same to FC-1 to shave of some valuable weight and added more fuel capcity.

Now i do doubt if this plane can achieve the same capability as Rafale/Typhoon. I don't think J-10 has an engine with TWR of 10 yet for one thing. They might get a souped up engine for that from Russia though.

Regarding the lighter than SAC's version of fifth gen fighter form CAC, it makes sense to walk on two feet and mature technologies on this fighter for ultimate J-XX rival in a more3 scaled down version (just like FC-1 has been a platform for maturing technologies that we know will help J-10)

my 2 cents
 

maglomanic

Junior Member
tphuang said:
It's believe that China does not want any single engined fighters in the near future, due to the reliability of its own engines (or the Russian engines).

I would disagree with it. We have already seen a freeze on the current single engine model of J-10 that has seen full scale production. These planes cannot be replaced or modified into twin engine configuration so we can safely assume that they will serve for a long time. WS-10A will definitely help the engine problem because China has made a consorted effort to copy western quality standards. Also i think Russians are also now offering more quality engines forced by Chinese.
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
wow, a few things:
601 - SAC
611 - CAC

1. In the past, I read plenty of reports that 601 won the competition to be the developer of J-XX. And, I even showed the JDW article that stated J-XX went into wind tunnel testing. From that, I calculated using J-10's experience that J-XX will be flying by 2008 and in service by 2015.
Many of the Chinese sites had sections like this:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

An F-22 style wind turrel model of XXJ was showned briefly in an AVIC I promotional video at the 2002 Zhuhai Airshow. First disclosed by US Office of Naval Intellegence (ONI) in 1997, XXJ is a 4th generation fighter to enter the service around 2015. Both CAC/611 Institute and SAC/601 Institute are working their own designs for a twin-engine multi-role fighter with enhanced stealth capability and maneuverability comparable to American F/A-22. It was speculated that 601 Institute has been working on designs based on conventional layout (J-13?) while 611 Institute has been working on designs based on canard/tailless delta wing (J-12?) plus belly air intake layout since early 90s.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

According to the reports of the Jane's Defence Weekly, China has already launched its next generation stealthy fighter aircraft programme, and Shenyang Aircraft Industry Co. (SAC) has been selected to head research and development of a new fighter for the PLA Air Force (PLAAF).

2. Now, a couple of things happened recently. The most important of which seems to be that the original news regarding 601 winning the contract for J-XX seems to not be entirely true. The Chinese boards mentionned that the 5th generation proposals are only being decided in April. This post here was a Q&A with Yang Wei (president of 611) in March
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

He basically answered in the last quesiton that both 601 and 611 have forwarded their proposals. Maybe, the proposals have been decided, maybe not. So, they are basically doing something like the Americans with F-22 and YF-23 by competing firms. (or X-32 and X-35 for JSF)

Also, J-XX might not be just one plane. China could easily create a hi-lo combination like F-22/F-35. It has long been speculated that 601 will get the project to develop something in the F-22 class due to its experience with heavy fighters (su-27). At the same time, 611's experience with J-10 means that it will be more suitable for the medium sized fighter. The question is whether or not the medium sized fighter by 611 is a highly upgraded version of J-10 or a new design using experience from J-10/FC-1.

If you look at the JSF project:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

1. 1993-1995, seems to be the initial phase of the project
2. 1996, decided that Boeing and LM are asked to submit competing proposals, basically they are to compete for JSF
3. 2001, LM is selected for JSF
4. 2006, the first prototype rolls out and expected to fly in the fall
5. 2011, expected to be in service

That's 5 years from when the selection is done to the flight and then another 5 years to enter service.

If CAC and SAC really did just submit their proposals at the beginning of this year for the hi and lo 5th generation planes and the selections are done this month, I don't see why the first prototype can take off in 5 years and why it can't join service 5 years from then.

Let's face it, China is no longer at the level it was in 1986 when CAC was selected for J-10. Back then, projects were getting cancelled left, right and center. Then, it had to leap 2 generations with J-10 from J-7. At the same time, it got help from the Israelis, but then found out the engine wasn't available, so it had to redesign. And then, a lot of the technologies like FBW, glass cockpit and such just weren't ready. Even with that, you still went from the first flight in 1998 to getting certified in 2003/4.

From the above, that's how I got the assessment that Yang Wei's reference to J-10's next generation fighter is actually the medium sized 5th generation plane. Also, you may have read that J-10B was started in 2000, first flied in 2003 and got certified in 2005. I'm pretty sure the modified J-10 project started a while back, so I would think it's developmental timeframe should be similar to that of J-10B. I mean, you just need to take a look at how long it took CAC to go from prototype 01 to 04 of JF-17 (pushed IOC back by 2 years?). I would expect similar level of change in the modified J-10, so I find it extremely unlikely that it will take another 5 years before modified J-10 can fly off.

As for the issue of single/twin engine, it seems like pla has decided that the Chinese/Russian engine are just not reliable enough for the 5th generation. When J-10 started, you have to remember that China was not under any kind of embargo and it basically got a lot of help from the Lavi project. So, it's natural that it would follow the Lavi design of using one engine.
 

SABRE

Junior Member
maglomanic said:
You are not entirely correct to assume that. First of all We saw news that there problems with the prototype that flew and thats whychanges were made. Then i have read interview of cheif engineer saying that prtotype 4 is going to be the baseline after it flys.

Now looking at Nigeria's F-7 deal (16.6 million dollars per plane)
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Then that contradicts the assupmtion that third world countries cannot afford FC-1 which is going to be between 15-20 million dollars.

The only way customers can probably bring down the price of purchase is by making compromise on avionics suite and FBW redundancy.

Think like this. Bangladesh doesnt need a more multirole aircraft like the one Pakistan wants (CAS,airsupriroity, antiship). They can split between a plane that is dedicated to airsuprioity, CAS and one for antishipping role. Or they don't have to pay for integration of weapons system like Pakistan (Pakistan will be integrating most of it's munitions inlcuding H2/H4).

I don't see why Bangladesh won't be able to afford FC-1 in it's 04 guise and with more mature technologies costing mere 15-20 million dollars.

Thats what I ment by poor countries going for downgraded versions. I never said BD is neve going to afford PT-4 verient. The word at PAC is that BD doesnt even want Griffo S-7 which almost all export JF-17s produced at PAC will comprise of. They'll probably end up with few Griffos and rest with F-7's radars. They say Griffo is expensive.

If if u strip down all the advance avionics from PT-4, than it technicaly falls back to PT-2 and 3, except for the changes in the structure (e.g: inlets). With full package PT-4 is offering; CAC & PAC have chance at selling JF-17s to countries like Egypt, Syria, may be to Saudis to replace F-5, also may be Iran to replace their F-4 and F-5 series. These countries are militarilistic countries. They dont compromise on their forces. If u sell them an FC-1/JF-17 which does not hold up against fighters like even MiG-21 Bison or even lets say F-7MG (which was canceled) they wont buy it. Hence it was importent for CAC to make an aircraft compitable against Mirage2000s and MiG-29s in air battle. CAC doesnt seem to be compromising on quality any more and quality product is for quality customer. For poor customers quality depends on the quantity of their pocket.

As for BD, they are going to buy JF-17. They already stated they are interested in 12 JF-17s. May be 4 out of 12 JF-17s will be PT-4 verients in complete form with full avionics package.
 

SABRE

Junior Member
tphuang said:
It was speculated that 601 Institute has been working on designs based on conventional layout (J-13?) while 611 Institute has been working on designs based on canard/tailless delta wing (J-12?) plus belly air intake layout since early 90s.

hmm...Considering 611's (CAC's) design with canards, it means that they are not building a stealth fighter. Canards will give away stealth big time. Seems like they are going for advance twin engine model of some thing like J-10 which can compete against some thing like EF-2000, Su-35/37 (with Su-30 being inferior to it) with multirole capability like JSF-35

Which means 601's (SAC's) conventional design can be stealthy like F-22.

tphuang said:
Also, J-XX might not be just one plane. China could easily create a hi-lo combination like F-22/F-35. It has long been speculated that 601 will get the project to develop something in the F-22 class due to its experience with heavy fighters (su-27). At the same time, 611's experience with J-10 means that it will be more suitable for the medium sized fighter.

considering what I what i said above, You may be right here on hi-low combination, but the CAC project wont be stealthy like JSF-35 since it has canards. It may have low RCS though.

CAC has experiance gained from J-10 and they can certainly build a twin engine superior varient of J-10 compareble to EF-2000 with Super Cruise, no after burners and JSF like shapre to reduce RCS (experienced from FC-1/JF-17). This will reduce the need for CAC aircraft to be stealth. Just like EF-2000 doesnt need to be. All CAC would require is a good Radar.
This aircraft can be either come to be known as J-10C, J-13 or FC-2.
 

Roger604

Senior Member
tphuang said:
If CAC and SAC really did just submit their proposals at the beginning of this year for the hi and lo 5th generation planes and the selections are done this month, I don't see why the first prototype can take off in 5 years and why it can't join service 5 years from then.

Fingers crossed, they should try to show off the 5th generation fighter at the 2008 Olympics. That would make Chinese people all over the world proud! :china:

SABRE said:
Canards will give away stealth big time.

Why is that so? Is the RCS of JSF much lower than EF-2000, SU-47 and Mig 1.44?
 

SABRE

Junior Member
Roger604 said:
Why is that so? Is the RCS of JSF much lower than EF-2000, SU-47 and Mig 1.44?


Well for one the movement of Canards give away the possition to enemy radar. Stealth fighters are carefully designed and attention is necessary towards its shape. The shape of the aircraft along with the composite materials must refrect the incoming enermy radar signals. The movements of canard and externaly installed weapons will reflect the rays back instead of refrecting them.

Though not as stealthy as F-22, JSF has well reduced RCS along with stealth composite materials. JSF has many stealth characteristics & EF-2000 has none. But the experts say that EF-2000 doesnt even require stealth.

The only thing i can think if that can give Canard aircraft stealth is plasma stealth. Its Russian technology. I dnt have much info on this. A Chinese friend (also a member here) told abt this. I think some kind of a plasma gas-cloud covers the aircraft for a period of a time. During tht period aircraft remains stealthy.
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Don't make assumptions about what CAC's design will look like. Huitong's site is only speculating. Considering that they didn't put forward the proposal until very recently, it's foolish to think that one of the many designs generated by CAC is the ultimate design. SAC or CAC would not be selected if their designs are not stealthy. And I really doubt plasma stealth is the way that China will go.

JSF actually has smaller frontal RCS, but F-22 has lower RCS in other angles.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top