New Chinese "F-X" single-engine fighter?

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
I did a quick google search and found the plane to be named J-14. If this true, it's truly impressive for PRC to co-develop both the (F-22 and F-35 alike) in the same time span.

J-14 probably doesn't exist -- 4 in Chinese culture is considered as bad as 13 in Western culture. A F-35 style fighter is years away and probalby hasn't been given a J-designation as of yet. It's more likely for JH-7B to exist at the moment than a Chinese F-35 type fighter.

Ever since J-20, I've heard about J-14, J-15, J-16, J-18 and J-19. I am now totally confused...

My 2 cents on J-10+ designations:
J-11, J-13 (cold war interceptor/fighter, never completed), J-15 (naval flanker), J-16 (silent flanker, has yet to be confirmed that it exists), J-18/J-19 (SAC proposal for J-XX which failed, number could be given for follow up fighter to J-15), J-20.
Of the above only J-20, J-11/B, J-15 are confirmed to exist and we'll hopefully get photos of J-16 sometime this year.

But what's certain at the moment is that there is no singled engined stealth fighter down the pipeline -- they've probably begun studies on it, but i estimate it may take a decade until we start seeing pictures or even definite rumors.
 

SinoSoldier

Colonel
J-14 probably doesn't exist -- 4 in Chinese culture is considered as bad as 13 in Western culture. A F-35 style fighter is years away and probalby hasn't been given a J-designation as of yet. It's more likely for JH-7B to exist at the moment than a Chinese F-35 type fighter.



My 2 cents on J-10+ designations:
J-11, J-13 (cold war interceptor/fighter, never completed), J-15 (naval flanker), J-16 (silent flanker, has yet to be confirmed that it exists), J-18/J-19 (SAC proposal for J-XX which failed, number could be given for follow up fighter to J-15), J-20.
Of the above only J-20, J-11/B, J-15 are confirmed to exist and we'll hopefully get photos of J-16 sometime this year.

But what's certain at the moment is that there is no singled engined stealth fighter down the pipeline -- they've probably begun studies on it, but i estimate it may take a decade until we start seeing pictures or even definite rumors.

There is no J-15 follow-up. J-18 or J-19 are simply speculated designations given to designs. Huitong vaguely mentions that a design called J-19 is in early development, but it is unconfirmed.

J-16 is SAC's stealth version of J-11B.

J-14 may simply be another name for the J-20. However, the stealth fighter-bomber at SAC may adopt another designation.

JH-7B is essentially the Chinese equivalent of the F-35 (except with two engines).

There may be a single-engine stealthy fighter in China that is developed from the JF-17. There was a report of a MoU signed between China and Pakistan to develop a stealth version of the JF-17 a few years back. A later article states that a variant of the JF-17, called YFC-1E, has been successfully developed.
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
There is no J-15 follow-up. J-18 or J-19 are simply speculated designations given to designs. Huitong vaguely mentions that a design called J-19 is in early development, but it is unconfirmed.

Oh I imagine there would be a follow up to the J-15 in some form or another. J-19 or J-18 or whatever is no more confirmed than JH-7B is.

J-16 is SAC's stealth version of J-11B.

Is that not what I said?

J-14 may simply be another name for the J-20. However, the stealth fighter-bomber at SAC may adopt another designation.

I doubt it. Just like how there hasn't been a real "F-13", there probably will never be a "J-14" either.

JH-7B is essentially the Chinese equivalent of the F-35 (except with two engines).

Yeah you know my view on the JH-7B, we'll have to agree to disagree for the moment.

There may be a single-engine stealthy fighter in China that is developed from the JF-17. There was a report of a MoU signed between China and Pakistan to develop a stealth version of the JF-17 a few years back. A later article states that a variant of the JF-17, called YFC-1E, has been successfully developed.

Right, the stealthy JF-17 -- but that doesn't really constitute a real 5th gen single engined fighter, which is what I was getting at.
 
Last edited:

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
And that CG is just what was the tri-plane might look like for the XXJ when it was very unknown ... long, long ago.
 

Quickie

Colonel
A STOL / CTOL type stealth fighter would be a great companion to the J-20. If there's really another stealth fighter in development, it's only logical for SAC to concentrate on this other end of the requirement and to avoid redundancy of producing another fighter of J-20 capability.
 

rhino123

Pencil Pusher
VIP Professional
Or maybe SAC should focus on designing and building a stealth version of the J-15 for deployment on carrier. Could be an STOL version, or a single engine fighter for carrier borne missions. Since I believe SAC is already involved in the J-15 (which was carrier base fighter).
 

delft

Brigadier
It's nice to plan to design an aircraft that can do everything, but you're likely to end up with an expensive lemon. Remember the F-111, that was also to be based on aircraft carriers? It was saved by being rejected by USN. I wonder if enough services will reject F-35 to save it or if it is already too late?
 

kwaigonegin

Colonel
Damn! have the journalist no shame? The 2nd picture is obviously PSed BUT the 1st picture is non other than an F-35!!
Amazing!
 
Top