JF-17/FC-1 Fighter Aircraft thread

thunderchief

Senior Member
Just a few minor points to raise, GPS guided weapons are not weather dependent, but you need fixed GPS co-ordinates for them to work, and I have not heard of any such weapon that could have its point of impact updated in flight to the extent that they can be used against moving targets.

Some modern JDAM weapons could hit moving targets because they have dual seekers (GPS and laser) . Although, I don't know does PAF has this type of munition .

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
What's your thought on this? Another false report or the real deal?

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


ISLAMABAD: (Dunya News) – Myanmar has become the first country to purchase JF-17 Thunder fighting jets from Pakistan. It will buy 16 jets in the first phase while Pakistan is interested in selling over 2 dozen jets, reported Dunya News on Thursday.

According to the agreement, Pakistan will provide services for looking after the jets as well. Both the countries had started talks on purchase of these jets in March. Sources told that negotiations are being held with other countries as well for the sale of JF-17 Thunder jets.
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
This talks about J-20 and JF-17/FC-1 so I decided to put it here.
by ROBERT BECKHUSEN

There’s aircraft designers, and then there’s ace designers. There are thousands of engineers around the world producing planes, but ace designers only come along once every few decades.

The United States had
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, the designer of the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. Germany’s
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
produced a line of famous fighter planes. The Soviet Union’s
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
created the muscular
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
to compete with America’s
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

Each of these aces were highly skilled, but they also owed much of their success to circumstance. They came along when their respective governments invested millions — or billions — of dollars into transforming brainpower into cutting-edge combat aircraft.

This intersection of engineering genius and lavish spending appears to have produced an ace designer in China. In recent years, an obscure engineer named
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
has rapidly risen to the leadership of the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 — a major warplane manufacturer responsible for quickly churning out Beijing’s top warplanes.


1*sM5KaHIm9YBzwgMbVv8RNg.png

Yang is principally responsible for two fighter jets that we know about. One of these is the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, China’s first stealth fighter. He also headed the development of the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, a modern and evolutionary improvement of the early MiGs developed by the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
a half-century ago.

What we know about Yang is that he was born in 1963, and enrolled at the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in 1978 at the age of 15. He completed two degrees and became a control systems engineer at Chengdu.

In a 2011 profile, the state-owned journal
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
described Yang as the brains behind China’s 1980s innovations in electronic fly-by-wire controls. The journal credited him with implementing “
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
” tests for aircraft, “breaking the blockade of foreign technology.”

This is overstated, but there’s no doubt Yang is highly influential. By the age of 35, he rose to Chengdu’s leadership and worked on the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, one of China’s most numerous warplane types. The J-10 was a tricky aircraft to build and was beset by numerous design flaws, including a notable failure in its fuel system in the late 1990s. But Yang’s solutions later worked their way into the JF-17; a practice known as “parallel development”, according to the journal.

In other words, what Yang seems to have done is establish an alternative philosophy to Western fighter design — illustrated by the stealthy, but
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. China now builds fighters cheaply, quickly and simply. This is not to say Yang’s fighters are perfect or even fundamentally new.


1*FYn7V3cdLJBiehIE7kwIFA.jpeg

Above — a Chinese J-20 stealth fighter. Photo via Chinese Internet. At top and below — Pakistan’s Chinese-designed JF-17. Photos via Pakistan Defense


1*r0DYqHLiAPZfrF1M-DNLDA.jpeg

JF-17
The JF-17 Thunder is a very interesting plane, if you like modern takes on classic Soviet-era fighters. You should.

The lineage is one the most interesting things about it. An upgrade of China’s
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 — itself a copy of the workhorse
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 — the Thunder is indicative Chengdu’s evolutionary approach to fighter design. The JF-17 traces its basic framework all the back to the 1950s. Plus, at $25 million per unit, it’s a bargain compared to a $200 million F-35.

Chengdu designed this multi-role fighter — which can dogfight and attack targets on the ground — for export to the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

The Thunder is
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
to the American
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, which is also in service with the Pakistani air force, but which cost twice as much per unit. The Thunder is not a stealth fighter. Far from it. But if an
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, then so can a JF-17.

This isn’t your grandfather’s MiG-by-another-name. For one, it has improved wings for greater maneuverability and a powerful
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. Another key difference is the shape of the nose. If you look at a MiG-21 or J-7, each has a rounded, inward-protruding engine air intake. This made sense when these fighters came about in the 1950s and 1960s, respectively, as both types had limited fire-control radars.

But as Chinese radar technology advanced, Chengdu moved the Thunder’s air intake into its fuselage, freeing up room for the Chinese-made
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 — which has capabilities for both air-to-air and air-to-ground strikes.

Then there’s the weapons. The fighter can carry quite a lot of weapons; about 3.6 tons worth. It’s capable of firing beyond-visual range missiles and the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 — designed to hit American aircraft carriers from 180 kilometers away. In Pakistani hands, the Indian Navy should worry.

In short, the JF-17 is cheap, powerful and doesn’t try to reinvent the wheel. It’s not going to transform air warfare. But it’s inexpensive and deadly enough for an air force on a budget to find attractive, especially if the alternative is a bank-breaking Western stealth jet.
Pakistan is the only current user, but the Thunder has emerged as Islamabad’s go-to fighter since it became operational in 2007. Part of this is political, as there’s a limited base of customers for jointly-developed Chinese and Pakistani fighter planes.

For China’s aviation industry, the continued reliance on foreign parts — and particularly engines — is one of its biggest liabilities. Beijing’s ace fighter designer might never overcome that.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Tyloe

Junior Member
There has been a recent report suggesting that Argetina have decided to reject the Jf-17 deal and opt for Israeli Kfir aircraft. Is this confirmed?
 

Zahid

Junior Member
@Tyloe - wantchinatimes.com - enough said.

@Equation - another article that confuses FTC-2000 & JF-17. Mig legacy can be seen clearly in FTC-2000. One would struggle to do the same with JF-17. Its cheap & effective, yes. But what else can one find common between Mig-21 & JF-17?
 

Ali Qizilbash

Junior Member
Registered Member
@Tyloe - wantchinatimes.com - enough said.

@Equation - another article that confuses FTC-2000 & JF-17. Mig legacy can be seen clearly in FTC-2000. One would struggle to do the same with JF-17. Its cheap & effective, yes. But what else can one find common between Mig-21 & JF-17?

There are 3 similarities between Mig 21 and JF 17, listed below;
1) Both are Aircraft;
2) Both Aircraft name starts with Alphabets; and
3) Both Aircraft name end in Numerics.

Hope this helps Mig-21 to JF-17 believers ;)
 

Quickie

Colonel
Imo, by the physical appearance, the JF-17 is closer to the F-16 than to the Mig21/F-7. Otoh, the nose intake of the Mig-21/F-7 is probably functionally closer to the under-slung intake of the F-16 than to the case of the side intakes of the JF-17.
 
Last edited:
Top