Japan Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Jun 25, 2017
I noticed Tokyo to choose cheaper Aegis option to beef up missile defense
June 23, 2017
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
now Japan evaluating sites for Aegis Ashore missile defense system
1 hour ago
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Japan is evaluating locations to base the Aegis Ashore land-based ballistic missile defense system of which it has expressed interest in acquiring to better defend against North Korean ballistic missiles.


According to the Asahi Shimbun newspaper, which quoted Japanese Defense Ministry sources, Japan is looking at placing the Aegis Ashore on two sites along the country’s western coast to give complete coverage against North Korean ballistic missiles.

The newspaper reported that the sites under consideration for the northern system are either the Kamo sub-base in Oga, Akita prefecture, and the Sado sub-base in Sado, Niigata prefecture; for the system covering the southern part of Japan, either the Unishima sub-base in Tsushima or the Fukuejima sub-base in Goto, both in Nagasaki prefecture.


These sites are all part of Japan’s current early-warning and ballistic missile-defense radar network operated by the Japan Air Self-Defense Force, operating a mixture of J/FPS-3, J/FPS-5 and other older radars.

The Asahi Shimbun reported that Japan plans to have its Aegis Ashore systems operational by 2023, although this could be pushed forward if the regional security changes. The newspaper quoted Defense Minister Itsunori Onodera as saying that “we want to introduce the system at the earliest possible schedule”.

Japan’s Defense Ministry had requested funds to prepare for the introduction of the Aegis Ashore in its budget request issued in late August, and when operational, would add another kinetic dimension to Japan’s BMD network and reduce the need for two of the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force’s four Kongo-class destroyers to be out at sea to provide BMD coverage for the entire country.

Japan is also operating PAC-3 surface-to-air missiles for defense against ballistic missiles and plans to upgrade a further two Aegis-equipped destroyers with BMD capabilities with two more destroyers due to be added to the fleet by 2021. It also plans to acquire the improved Raytheon SM-3 Block IB/IIA and PAC-3 Missile Segment Enhancement missiles.

In a related development, Onodera said in a Sept. 22 news conference that he has suspended the study on Japan acquiring the capability to launch counterattacks on enemy bases on the instructions of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.

He had previously made the suggestion in March that Japan should consider procuring long-range cruise missiles capable of striking North Korean sites should the North launch missiles targeting Japan. At the time, he was a member of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party’s security panel, and had not been made defense minister.

Despite this, Corey Wallace, an Einstein postdoctoral fellow in the Graduate School of East Asian Studies at Freie Universitat in Berlin, Germany, told Defense News that he understands Japan’s Defense Ministry is still looking at the possibility of such a capability as part of Japan’s upcoming Mid-Term Defense Program and new National Defense Program Guidelines.

Japan’s wartime past and pacifist constitution has meant that any move to acquire capabilities that could be used in an offensive capacity would be politically sensitive. Until now, the Japanese Self-Defense Forces have adhered strictly to an exclusively defensive force posture, depending on the mutual defense treaty with the United States to serve as the “spear” in the event of Japan being attacked.

However, nuclear-armed North Korea’s increasing belligerence, improving missile capabilities, questions about the efficacy of BMD systems and fears of the Trump administration disengaging from the region has increasingly unsettled Japan, especially after North Korea conducted missile tests that flew over Japan and triggered air raid sirens.
 
now noticed an interesting picture of the Asahi in Twitter:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

DKpqEAkV4AEPrRw.jpg
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
US submarine joins Japanese, Australian counterparts for trilateral drills

The US and Royal Australian Navy sent their submarines to waters south of Japan where the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force (JMSDF) hosted a trilateral submarine competition (SUBCOMP) exercise from September 12 to 19.

Japan deployed four submarines to the exercise while the US Navy participated with Los Angeles-class attack submarine USS Key West (SSN 722) and Royal Australian Navy with HMAS Dechaineux (SSG 76).

The SUBCOMP exercise provided an opportunity to further the integration and trilateral coordination in an anti-submarine warfare (ASW) environment for the three navies.

The competition stressed each crew’s ability to conduct various aspects of ASW. The top performer is recognized with the Japanese Battle Efficiency Award.

“We’re honored to participate in this year’s JMSDF Submarine Competition,” said Cmdr. Dan Sutherland, Dechaineux’s commanding officer. “This is our first opportunity to participate and I’m looking forward to future exercises with the JMSDF and the U.S. Navy.

During the exercise, a JMSDF officer embarked Key West.

“Embarking a JMSDF officer provided valuable insight into diesel submarine operations and tactics,” said Hill. “I highly recommend continuing this practice during future SUBCOMP exercises.”

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

B.I.B.

Captain
Yes but the simple truth is that the US and Japan doesn't want the status quo to change. For some weird reason they think they are the key to "keeping peace in the region" negotiating or sharing the responsibility with other regional power like Russia or China is not needed. But the reality is that it is not. There are many academia's has proven this. Israel already has nukes and yet NO one from the West wouldn't not even raise their voice against it or force sanctions upon them. Why the double standard?

Perhaps its because Israel and even Iran are a lot more discreet about it.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
First up Type 87 Self propelled twin 35mm Anti aircraft gun
Against Aircraft AA guns are a bit dated but turn this on infantry and... It's carnage.
Type 74 MBT not Japan's most successful tank, old gun old armor. still not bad.
Type 90 MBT Japan's top MBT and damn that demo gets the blood flowing.
Type 10 MBT Japan's next MBT, compared to the beefy engine of the 90 this thing is a freakin Ninja.
Type 16 Maneuver Combat Vehicle 8x8 wheeled 105mm
AAV7A1 Amphibious assault vehicle.
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
First up Type 87 Self propelled twin 35mm Anti aircraft gun
Against Aircraft AA guns are a bit dated but turn this on infantry and... It's carnage.
Type 74 MBT not Japan's most successful tank, old gun old armor. still not bad.
Type 90 MBT Japan's top MBT and damn that demo gets the blood flowing.
Type 10 MBT Japan's next MBT, compared to the beefy engine of the 90 this thing is a freakin Ninja.
Type 16 Maneuver Combat Vehicle 8x8 wheeled 105mm
AAV7A1 Amphibious assault vehicle.

Good the Type 74 is similar to AMX-30 :) Léopard I others... 1960-70s tanks medium tanks, few armored max 100 mm but faster, for power comparison approximatively 1 Leclerc want 5 AMX-30 about a platoon ofc the number is always interesting.

Leclerc shooting up to 40 km / h, up to 4000 m 90% success, 1500/2000 m 95% max 6 targets in 30 sec

In recent articles the 3 best are Type 10 ( special armoring but only a 44 cal gun ) K2 and T-14 not in service normaly the best but new and some points to confirmed
 
Last edited:

asif iqbal

Lieutenant General
JMSDF a true top tier navy with formidable firepower

Also lots of experience and proven track record without going too much into history
 
Top