Please say something when posting images or diagrams. I don't know what your image means or represents.
J-20 5th Gen Fighter Thread VI
- Thread starter siegecrossbow
- Start date
- Status
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
"No doubt" LOL Math non-existent, eyeballing logic fail. But let's just add the "if you know anything about..." in there so the feeble-minded will be inclined to agree with you to look like they "know stuff"... by your definition. Just one question: in your imagination, is it that the higher the weight one calls the J-20 the more s/he knows about "structures" or does one just agree with precisely your 19 for maximum "knowingness" and any other number detracts from it? LOLOL Called you out on this "tactic" many times; learn a new trick, will ya?
Clearly j20 is better than su57 in frontal rcs. I don’t want to let the war start cause I just get banned in pdf.
Su-33KUB aka MiG-29 or 787 .... or Pegasus?
I have no idea what you are talking about, my ids are identical through all forums.
plawolf
Lieutenant General
What is the source of this? I didn’t expect much from the PAKFA, but from this, it barely looks like there is any LO at all...
Then I beg your pardon, but since he - under more acronyms than any other member I banned so far - was just banned at the PDF and at the SecretProjectsForum and since he had the habit to come back again after each ban with a new name, I'm a bit carefully.
Ok, I am not a loser like him.
The source is in the pic, seems like a western doc, this pic is the only thing I have from him.
Also, many sources claim the rcs of su57 is 0.5 m^2, which is not impressive at all.
The so-called 0.5 m^2 is just a meme. The stealth of the aircraft depends on where what angle, and so on. You can't say that one aircraft has 0.5 or 0.01 rcs. That's bullshit.
- Status