J-20 5th Gen Fighter Thread VI

Status
Not open for further replies.

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
What a minute, Deino, are you based in Mainz? I was invited to give lectures at the Mainz Medical University in April. I spent 3 days there. Beautiful city!


Yes ... and please next time give me a call and be my guest.;)
 

by78

General
I think others have complained that this forum, despite the views of its members, have veered into Fanboy territory. I stick to my heterodox views relative to this forum; the J-20 is too clunky to be a truly breakout Chinese fighter, whatever others may think (ventral fins, canards etc in a stealth configuration, both not deadly, but unwanted)..

As for the IPE / WS-10X engine, it's possible that the IPE / WS-10X is mainly a reliability improvement on the J-20. The Chinese have made breakthroughs with rhenium blades recently, and a main contest between Western and Chinese/Russian engines has been a question of lifespan and durability. The Chinese have been intensifying training of late, meaning that Western-style fighter engines with high service life is more necessary. On the other hand, the WS-15 could be heavily overclocked to reach 170-180kN, and the WS-15 might not be able to sustain the same lifespans as reliability-improved WS-10. We do know, however, that the WS-15 seems to be a low temperature engine (good for IR stealth), so that the WS-15 might also have service life improvements.

Don't mean to be pedantic, but there's a rule against what you just did:

  • Do not quote or respond to moderator posts. If you have issue with one, PM that moderator, or another about it. Be advised: Moderators have a forum where actions are discussed. Arguing with a moderator o open threads will be cause for warnings or suspensions depending on the severity.
 

by78

General
The first one was a lost image...

48444469507_0486460be6_o.jpg

48444316631_f2865e8585_h.jpg

48444471287_8d232cbe0b_h.jpg

48444316841_0156fb6fec_h.jpg

48444471427_1772ba05d7_h.jpg
 
Last edited:

by78

General
first image screams to me "manufacturer promo for a generic cockpit systems of a simulator image"using the j20 -like silhouette to sell the whole thing better.

Right... except that's not a generic cockpit or cockpit simulator. The HUD checks out, as are the explosive cords on the canopy.

And just how does it being a promo preclude it from accurately portraying the real thing?

Manufacturer promo image:
5252417298_dc1b5e7666_o.jpg


The real JF-17 cockpit:
48445550297_81ea4e7e8b_o.jpg
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top