J-15 carrier-borne fighter thread

Arcgem

New Member
Registered Member
"弹" in this context (projectile/bomb) would be pronounced "dàn" instead of "tán", which has an entirely different meaning (to play [an instrument]).

Otherwise, everything's good.
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Anybody has the latest pic of J15? I don't know what "improved J15" is this Indian website talking about. First posted by Ron Humble at CDF

It's talking about that blurry photo from last year of a J-15 mock up supposedly with a nose attachment for catapult launch.

Anyway this article is not very interesting nor should we use it as confirmation or proof of anything, because it is one of those "official" articles that sources foreign media to generate news.

In other words, it's basically a puff piece. Sometimes official media comes up with good revelations about the military, but this article is not one of them.
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
When Chinese website uses Indian or any other foreign website as their source, it's probably not a good idea to trust them until we can find that foreign website it is referring to.
 

no_name

Colonel
"弹" in this context (projectile/bomb) would be pronounced "dàn" instead of "tán", which has an entirely different meaning (to play [an instrument]).

Otherwise, everything's good.

I've always thought it is pronounced tan as this word means 'to flick in a spring like way'. dan IMO is for projectiles or missiles but not really appropriate for referring to aircrafts.
 

vesicles

Colonel
"弹" in this context (projectile/bomb) would be pronounced "dàn" instead of "tán", which has an entirely different meaning (to play [an instrument]).

Otherwise, everything's good.

I agree with no name. The word in this context should be "tan2" since it is used to describe a catapult, which pushes something out using a spring-like fashion.
 

Arcgem

New Member
Registered Member
Woops! That was embarrassing. This is what happens when you post while half-asleep and not bothering to fact-check...

Anyways, the J-15's future as a CATOBAR fighter has been hinted at, if not outright confirmed. Would its role be more like the US F-14, as the two fighters have similar sizes, as opposed to the smaller F/A-18?
 

Arcgem

New Member
Registered Member
Yes, I know how different instruments have different verbs associated with them, but my only experience with the word "弹" had been in reference to either pianos or bombs...

But hey, you learn something new every day! That is why I took a liking to this forum.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Could that article be referring to the photo from end of last year, where we all saw a J-15 test frame with what looks like a front landing gear redesigned for catapult takeoff?



Just wondering...
I think you are right. I believe that this is just a rehash of occurrences we talked about here on SD some time ago.

These "new" reports do not include any new pictures from what I have seen.
 
Top