Iranian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
The thing is the Iranians have done everything in their power to get the US’s attention, yet the US isn’t invading. We don’t view Iran was worth it.
The old claims of Oil don’t mean much when the US is an oil power again. In the strategic stratosphere the Iranian operations are an annoyance but Where Iran views the US as the great Satan the US views Iran as an Imp.

The more realistic threats of invasion would be the neighbors.
Iraq of course proved that
But the US did Iran a favor with the Gulf war Iraq was broken twice in rapid succession. Unable to recoup the losses and rebuild their elite units Saddam could not even think of waging large scale operations against Iran again. Then with the 2003 invasion and aftermath Iran basically was given a state on it’s boarders in which it could mold to a puppet regime.
The more likely outcome if the US really got involved would be strikes not invasion.
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
The thing is the Iranians have done everything in their power to get the US’s attention, yet the US isn’t invading. We don’t view Iran was worth it.
The old claims of Oil don’t mean much when the US is an oil power again. In the strategic stratosphere the Iranian operations are an annoyance but Where Iran views the US as the great Satan the US views Iran as an Imp.
That's a cute explanation. Iranians want US attention?? For what? They are a sovereign country that wants to be left alone so they can sell the oil that rightfully belongs to them. If the US doesn't want to buy, it's fine; but it cannot stop other sovereign countries from purchasing oil from Iran, including the non-UN embargoed Syria. And if the US wants to stop Iran from developing nukes, it must strike a deal and pay for it because Iran has every right that America has to develop its own weapons including nukes. It doesn't want your attention; it wants to be left alone to develop. It is the US that needs the world's attention as it desperately to tries to show that it's still the big kahuna and it is the US that needs Iran's attention if it wants any deal to stop Iran from exercising its rights to self-defense.

The US doesn't view Iran as worth it? It sure doesn't mind dragging its own name through the muck with every underhanded tactic it can think of to hurt Iran. This clever imp is making the great Satan look like a bungling idiot chasing after it. To be honest, it looks like the US isn't invading Iran because 1. it's scared that Iran can impose heavy costs in a very prolonged conflict and 2. it knows it can't afford to get mired in a super-Iraq/Vietnam while China's fully dialed in on its own growth.
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
When the first Indian captain quit, delaying Adrian darya 1's departure from Gibraltar, I thought this gutless coward might have bought the Americans enough time to re-seize the ship in port. But now I see his early departure was a blessing. If this scoundrel were the captain when the bribe was offered, there is no doubt that Pompeo's pumpkin gut and Bolton's Scottish terrier mustache would be engorged in freshly pirated Iranian oil today as they grinned with delight to see their devilish plans come to fruition.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


This is another article, more descriptive. It said Brain Hook emailed Captain Akhilesh Kumar twice, once with the offer and a second time with a threat:

"With this money you can have any life you wish and be well-off in old age. If you choose not to take this easy path, life will be much harder for you." - Brian Hook

And Captain Akhilesh Kumar ignored both to carry out his duty. Now his name will be known worldwide for professionalism and integrity. Hiring him is a proven guarantee that your ship and cargo are in unbend-able hands. Truly worthy of a captain's salute!
 
Last edited:

Gatekeeper

Brigadier
Registered Member
That's a cute explanation. Iranians want US attention?? For what? They are a sovereign country that wants to be left alone so they can sell the oil that rightfully belongs to them. If the US doesn't want to buy, it's fine; but it cannot stop other sovereign countries from purchasing oil from Iran, including the non-UN embargoed Syria. And if the US wants to stop Iran from developing nukes, it must strike a deal and pay for it because Iran has every right that America has to develop its own weapons including nukes. It doesn't want your attention; it wants to be left alone to develop. It is the US that needs the world's attention as it desperately to tries to show that it's still the big kahuna and it is the US that needs Iran's attention if it wants any deal to stop Iran from exercising its rights to self-defense.

The US doesn't view Iran as worth it? It sure doesn't mind dragging its own name through the muck with every underhanded tactic it can think of to hurt Iran. This clever imp is making the great Satan look like a bungling idiot chasing after it. To be honest, it looks like the US isn't invading Iran because 1. it's scared that Iran can impose heavy costs in a very prolonged conflict and 2. it knows it can't afford to get mired in a super-Iraq/Vietnam while China's fully dialed in on its own growth.

I noticed how some members here are in full denial of the fact. If as they prefer to live in an ideal imaginary reality of their own.

Notice he didn't even bother to defend the actions of the USA in bribe and threats! And just hoping it will go away on its own. If that was China, Russia or Iran. I would bet he would point it out as another example of authoritarian, undemocratic, blah blah, etc.

instead we get this rambling about how Iran seek attention of the world. Lol. Talk about revisionist. Re-writing history to suit youw own narratives. I seem to re-call the WORLD was humming away quite nicely, with everyone getting along just fine. Then comes Trump, pulling out of the Iran deal unilateraly! Now let's see, who's seeking attention?
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
His Post is logged at 4:20 PM mine at 4:21PM but am on a cell phone so when I Hit post on mine he had posted his a few seconds earlier. And it wasn’t worth the time to re-edit. The second I saw his by line I knew what was coming.
 

Gatekeeper

Brigadier
Registered Member
His Post is logged at 4:20 PM mine at 4:21PM but am on a cell phone so when I Hit post on mine he had posted his a few seconds earlier. And it wasn’t worth the time to re-edit. The second I saw his by line I knew what was coming.

Ok fair enough, we are here to have a sensible debate. Timing is everything. Lol

But still, the points about attention seeking etc still requires addressing?
 

Anlsvrthng

Captain
Registered Member
The thing is the Iranians have done everything in their power to get the US’s attention, yet the US isn’t invading. We don’t view Iran was worth it.
The old claims of Oil don’t mean much when the US is an oil power again. In the strategic stratosphere the Iranian operations are an annoyance but Where Iran views the US as the great Satan the US views Iran as an Imp.

The more realistic threats of invasion would be the neighbors.
Iraq of course proved that
But the US did Iran a favor with the Gulf war Iraq was broken twice in rapid succession. Unable to recoup the losses and rebuild their elite units Saddam could not even think of waging large scale operations against Iran again. Then with the 2003 invasion and aftermath Iran basically was given a state on it’s boarders in which it could mold to a puppet regime.
The more likely outcome if the US really got involved would be strikes not invasion.
Sounds like the talk of a high school bully.
 
Tuesday at 8:50 PM
Sunday at 3:32 PM
and now it's been like 30 (thirty) hours since
Iran oil tanker pursued by US turns off tracker near Syria
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

:

Clipboard548.jpg


where repeat where is she?
off Syria according to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
(I said "according to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
"):
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

·
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Updated graphic of Adrian Darya 1 movements since disabling AIS. Weird her apparent location in Tartus, she could be waiting in safe waters her turn to unload in Baniyas (where Silvia 1, another Iranian tanker, unloaded last week)
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
in case you didn't know
Iran Now Using Advanced Centrifuges, Violating Nuclear Deal
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Iran has begun using arrays of advanced centrifuges to enrich uranium in violation of its 2015 nuclear deal, a spokesman said Saturday, warning that Europe has little time left to offer new terms to save the accord.

The comments by Behrouz Kamalvandi of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran signal a further cut into the one year experts estimate Tehran would need to have a enough material for building a nuclear weapon if it chose to pursue one. Iran maintains its program is peaceful.

Iran already has breached the stockpile and enrichment level limits set by the deal, while stressing it could quickly revert back to the terms of the accord if Europe finds a way for it to sell its crude oil abroad despite crushing U.S. sanctions. However, questions likely will grow in Europe over Iran's intentions as satellite photos obtained by The Associated Press on Saturday showed an once-detained oil tanker Tehran reportedly promised wouldn't go to Syria was off its coast.

Tensions between Iran and the U.S. have risen in recent months, with mysterious attacks on oil tankers near the Strait of Hormuz, Iran shooting down a U.S. military surveillance drone, and other incidents across the wider Middle East. Iran separately seized another ship and detained 12 Filipino crewmembers, a semi-official news agency reported Saturday.

"Our stockpile is quickly increasing," Kamalvandi warned in a news conference. "We hope they will come to their senses."

The accord saw Iran limits its enrichment of uranium in exchange for sanctions relief. Among the limitations was a requirement that Iran use only 5,060 first-generation IR-1 centrifuges. A centrifuge is a device that enriches uranium by rapidly spinning uranium hexafluoride gas.

Today, Iran has begun using an array of 20 IR-6 centrifuges and another 20 of IR-4 centrifuges, Kamalvandi said. An IR-6 can produce enriched uranium 10 times as fast as an IR-1, Iranian officials say, while an IR-4 produces five times as fast.

Iran already has increased its enrichment up to 4.5%, above the 3.67% allowed under the deal. Using advanced centrifuges means a shorter time would be needed to push up its enrichment.

Kamalvandi said Iran had the ability to go beyond 20% enrichment of uranium. Experts say 20% is just a short technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90% enrichment.

While Kamalvandi stressed that "the Islamic Republic is not after the bomb," he warned that Iran was running out of ways to stay in the accord.

"If Europeans want to make any decision, they should do it soon," he said.

Kamalvandi also said Iran would allow U.N. inspectors to continue to monitor sites in the country. A top official from the U.N.'s International Atomic Energy Agency was expected to meet with Iranian officials in Tehran on Sunday.

Kamalvandi made the remarks in a news conference carried on live television. He spoke from a podium with advanced centrifuges standing next to him.

In Paris, U.S. Defence Secretary Mark Esper said Iran's announcement was expected.

"It's no surprise that the Iranians are going to pursue what the Iranians have always intended to pursue," Esper said at a news conference with his French counterpart, Florence Parly.

Meanwhile Saturday, satellite images showed a once-detained Iranian oil tanker pursued by the U.S. appears to be off the coast of Syria, where Tehran reportedly promised the vessel would not go when authorities in Gibraltar agreed to release it several weeks ago. Iran later seized a British-flagged oil tanker which it still holds.

The tanker Adrian Darya-1, formerly known as the Grace-1, turned off its Automatic Identification System late Monday, leading to speculation it would be heading to Syria. Other Iranian oil tankers have similarly turned off their tracking beacons in the area, with analysts saying they believe crude oil ends up in Syria in support of embattled President Bashar Assad's government.

Images obtained by The Associated Press early Saturday from Maxar Technologies appeared to show the vessel off Syria's coast, some 2 nautical miles (3.7 kilometres) off shore under intermittent cloud cover.

Iranian and Syrian officials have not acknowledged the vessel's presence there. There was no immediate report in Iranian state media about the ship, though authorities earlier said the 2.1 million barrels of crude oil onboard had been sold to an unnamed buyer.

The oil on board would be worth about $130 million on the global market, but it remains unclear who would buy the oil as they'd face the threat of U.S. sanctions.

The new images matched a black-and-white image earlier tweeted by John Bolton, the U.S. national security adviser.

"Anyone who said the Adrian Darya-1 wasn't headed to #Syria is in denial," Bolton tweeted. "We can talk, but #Iran's not getting any sanctions relief until it stops lying and spreading terror!"

U.S. prosecutors in federal court allege the Adrian Darya's owner is Iran's Revolutionary Guard, which answers only to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. On Wednesday, the U.S. imposed new sanctions on an oil shipping network it alleged had ties to the Guard and offered up to $15 million for anyone with information that disrupts its paramilitary operations.

Brian Hook, the U.S. special envoy for Iran, also has reportedly emailed or texted captains of Iranian oil tankers, trying to scare them into not delivering their cargo.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Transportation Department's Maritime Administration issued on Saturday a new warning to shippers about a potential threat off the coast of Yemen in the southern Red Sea.

"A maritime threat has been reported in the Red Sea in the vicinity of Yemen," the warning read. "The nature of the event is potential increased hostilities that threaten maritime security."

Large areas of war-torn Yemen are held by the country's Houthi rebels, which are allied to Iran. Shipping in the Red Sea has been targeted previously by rebel attacks. On Wednesday, a warning went out after two small boats followed one ship in the region, but there's been no other information about a new threat there.

Cmdr. Joshua Frey, a spokesman for the U.S. Navy's Bahrain-based 5th Fleet, said the Navy remained ready to maintain the safety of shippers in the region.

Separately Saturday, the semi-official ISNA news agency said Iran seized a tugboat and its crew of 12 Filipinos near the Strait of Hormuz on suspicion of smuggling diesel fuel. The report did not elaborate. Frey said the U.S. Navy was aware of the report, but declined to comment further.
 
Top