Indian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Discussion in 'World Armed Forces' started by bd popeye, Mar 31, 2012.

  1. Xsizor
    Offline

    Xsizor Junior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2019
    Messages:
    147
    Likes Received:
    147
    To call out someone a troll just because you can't digest their opinion is immature. I tried to reason out why there is a clearly visible difference between the exterior build quality of the frontline destroyers of 3 countries above. Indian shipbuilding industry is very small. They don't feature in any list of prominent shipbuilding nations. Afaik, Indian shipbuilders are mainly undertaking government projects. As for the Indian destroyers, I don't know about the technology housed within such shoddy hulls BUT since India imports a lot of critical technology from other nations, i'd assume them to be a lot better in that area.

    Stealth isn't clear from just design. Tolerances and attention to details regarding acoustics and vibrations play an important deal in stealth of submarines. If the exterior of the frontline destroyers are like this then it'd be hard to convince anyone that India, with little experience in submarine shipbuilding ( let along nuclear submarines) would churn out SSBN of atleast mediocre quality.
    Your point being that judgement as a troll is therefore rubbish.

    My third point was that Russian engineers would be facing difficulties in "equipping" new indian hands with necessary skill. It is a fact that nuclear reactors and subsystems used in Indian SSBN are of Russian origin or has been made with assistance from Russia with Russian specialists cooperating with the build. Are you implying that Indian technicians require no support from Russia or any other country to build an SSBN ? India would not be building Scorpenes ( a diesel electric) without the paid assistance of French engineers of DCNS . Enough a point.

    This thread sure can turn into an echo chamber BUT hey, since you are here after a LONG time, i'd be not wrong in assuming that you'd invest some time to make this thread a bit balanced ?
     
  2. Jura
    Offline

    Jura General

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2013
    Messages:
    20,796
    Likes Received:
    26,402
    Deino please take a look here, could be antics in this thread
     
  3. Tri Nitro Toluene
    Offline

    Tri Nitro Toluene Junior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2015
    Messages:
    110
    Likes Received:
    76
    Making an opinion based on prejudice isn't sane. And mixing it humourous exaggeration is what we call trolling.

    Either you have edited your post or I was drunk at that time to reply as took the post in that tone. If latter is true, my apologies, if not I maintain what I said.
    May not be prominent but its still far from being called non existent. India lags behind Western World, Russia & East Asia.

    We take around 10 years for making a ship right now which needs 5 years on global average.

    And all its limted success is attributed to India being lower middle income country relatively new to defense industry.
    Ahead of most countries of its own class but because of size while lags behind other major powers.
    There are lot of technologies produced India to be "good enough" and used by armed forces. When Indian armed forces have money for better goodies and homegrown stuff is not upto mark, they go for import. In case they can't buy that out because of global restrictions like in case of strategic weapons, they get it from home.
    Gradually, share of imported material on Indian inventory has been falling and defense exports have increased by 6 times in last 3 years.
    Industry will mature once it gets used to new projects it receives.
    That is why DCNS was involved. We will build submarines on our own if none agrees for TOT. TOT is a guarantee of technology and over time, India will become independent. As of now, idea is to buy foreign submarine design with the condition that the design will be completely owned by India and India can manufacture unlimited submarines once the 6 submarine contract of P75I is completed.

    There are some design risks as making submarine with AIP, missiles etc will need some design change from scorpene. So, it may cause delays. India currently has enough money to spare and hence prefers to have this risk free path. If none agrees, then India will make its own submarines.

    Otherwise, we will keep gaining technology from others till we have enough.
    Mediocre quality isn't what I'm talking about. Submarines need even more special welding techniques. Design still plays a great role in stealth & roles of vibrations & projections appear thereafter. Signature is low, not that quite however.
    Probably its framing on previous post tempted me.
    There are actually a couple of countries including PRC whose military industry is based on USSR/Russian stuff.
    Hence, "tough time" particularly for one doesn't mean anything.
    Updated, I'm not here to balance.

    There are rarely any active Indian members on this forum. I may be one. And since this forum doesn't have flame baiting problem what I face elsewhere, I will get a better platform to post too.
     
    B.I.B. and Brumby like this.
  4. Tri Nitro Toluene
    Offline

    Tri Nitro Toluene Junior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2015
    Messages:
    110
    Likes Received:
    76
    #INDIANNAVY & #FRENCH Navy Conducting Joint Maneuvers In Arabian Sea with participation of number of fighters, helicopters & coordinated exercise between the ships. D6GWNyOUEAA2lLZ.jpg D6GWPKeV4AANPc4.jpg
    [​IMG][​IMG][​IMG]
     
    Gloire_bb, B.I.B. and Brumby like this.
  5. Hyperwarp
    Offline

    Hyperwarp Captain

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2007
    Messages:
    2,465
    Likes Received:
    4,511
  6. FactsPlease
    Offline

    FactsPlease Junior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2017
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    117
    1) Is that a long-bow standard?
    2) I believe this marks the latest 1st-line combat equipment provision from USA, other than P8I and M777 gun. Now that F-21, F-18 (naval version), and aircraft carrier design, including EMALS and nuclear engine, will be next big items to watch.
     
  7. gelgoog
    Offline

    gelgoog Senior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2017
    Messages:
    1,058
    Likes Received:
    1,063
    I doubt it is a long-bow type since I do not see the mast radar. Then again in some variants you can add the radar on the field.
    The US can't even get EMALS working for themselves yet. I agree that the Super Hornet would be a good purchase.
     
    FactsPlease likes this.
  8. TerraN_EmpirE
    Offline

    TerraN_EmpirE Tyrant King

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2005
    Messages:
    11,628
    Likes Received:
    10,023
    E model is classified as the Apache Guardian. It has Longbow was the AH64D model.
    The radar is removable. Without the radar an Apache Longbow would still be called an Apache Longbow. However the Indians didn’t buy Apache Longbows they bought Apache Guardians.
    As to EMALS it works it’s just ironing out the wrinkles. Like any new technology it’s loaded with issues to be solved.

    However India seems to have dropped the N from their CVN program.
     
    B.I.B. and Brumby like this.
  9. Mohsin77
    Offline

    Mohsin77 Junior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2019
    Messages:
    156
    Likes Received:
    261
    This Apache deal has been riddled with incompetence from the start, since the MoD decided to give these beasts to the Air Force instead of the Army:

    "The Indian Air Force is refusing to give up control of its AH-64 Apache helicopter gunships, insisting these helicopters are crucial for certain air combat missions (attacking air defense radars and other helicopters). The army generals are furious and demanding that the government set the air force straight. "

    https://strategypage.com/htmw/htlead/articles/20130103.aspx

    ... what a total waste.

    The Guardian has Longbow capability; however the Indians bought less Longbows than the Apaches. For the 6 ship order, they only bought 4 radars. I'm guessing the same proportion applied to the 22 ship order. I'm guessing they did it because they plan on swapping the radars off the ships in maintenance... at least that's the only explanation that won't be completely ridiculous. Since the top mounted Longbow is the most important part of the Apache!
     
  10. TerraN_EmpirE
    Offline

    TerraN_EmpirE Tyrant King

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2005
    Messages:
    11,628
    Likes Received:
    10,023
    You have missed a detail here. The Gaurdian has data links as such a single Longbow radar equipped Apache can beam its data to its unequiped siblings. They can use the Longbow birds like scouts.
    In the high hot of the Hindu Kush even Apache helicopters get winded not deploying longbow radars saves some energy for the lift capacity of the helicopter.

    Little known fact the AH1Z Vipers that have been sitting in the US boneyards for Pakistan also can mount longbow radars. It’s just they use a wing tip station as opposed to the mast.
     
    Brumby likes this.
Loading...

Share This Page