Indian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

aksha

Captain

iyQuVir.jpg

9AzTpaU.jpg

2R9Fqnf.jpg

6UtLlpd.jpg

iJVK5AI.jpg



Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Lots of planespotter buzz around Eielson AFB, Alaska in the run up to Red Flag ALASKA 16-1 that begins April 28. The Indian Air Force's contingent (4 x Su-30MKI, 4 x Jaguar Darin II, 2 x Il-78M & 2 C-17 Globemaster III) that arrived on April 16 have been on routine practice runs at the base with USAF jets.

Squaring off with mostly US Air Force 354th Operational Group 'aggressor' F-16s and other support jets, the joint exercise will involve simulated interdiction, attack, air superiority, defence suppression, airlift, air refueling and reconnaissance aircraft -- all profiles the IAF has proven to be formidable at in past Red Flags/Cope India/Thunder exercises.

This will also be the second time that the IAF gets to stretch its legs in the US Department of Defense's largest airspace -- the Joint Pacific Alaska Range Complex (JPARC), which according to the Eielson page, contains 67,000 square miles of airspace, 11 military operating areas, and three weapons ranges.

As you know, it's been a big month for Eielson AFB, which has been chosen to be the USAF's first F-35A operational base in the Pacific Air Forces' Area of Responsibility. The first aircraft are expected to arrive in 2020.

Will have a full report up here on the exercise during and after. Enjoy these pictures by U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Joshua Turner.
 
Last edited:

Brumby

Major
India's Biggest $25 Billion Defence Deal to Crash Land

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


NEW DELHI: India has a record of sour defence deals. While the Rafael deal with France to buy 36 fighters jets at nearly `60,000 crore is stuck over a year despite announcement made by PM Narendra Modi during his Paris visit in April 2015, India’s biggest defence buy with its old military hardware partner Russia threatens to crash. It is thrice bigger than the French deal and concerns 127 Fifth Generation Fighter Aircraft (FGFA) costing over $25 billion. `1,500 crore, which India has already paid for preliminary design of the aircraft, may go down the drain. It is the IAF—despite desperation to strengthen its combat fleet—that has put its foot down, citing differences with Russia, the co-developer of the FGFA project.

In an internal communication to the Ministry of Defence, the Air Headquarters has flagged at least 15 objections to the Fifth Generation Fighter Aircraft (FGFA), ranging from fighter’s unreliable engine, poor stealth features, and inadequate radar to its high cost overrun. The letter sent last month has virtually grounded the entire program.

“Under the present scenario, only a political call can revive the program,” a highly placed source said.

In fact, IAF went further to slam Russians for not giving access to the developed prototypes of the aircraft to its pilots. Moreover, it also expressed apprehension that the Russians would not share critical design information with India because they have deliberately reduced the Indian work share despite India’s huge expenditure on the preliminary design. India’s work share in FGFA research and development and other aspects of the multi-billion dollar project at the moment is nearly 10 per cent, even though Delhi is bearing 50 per cent of the project cost.

In 2007, the Congress-led UPA government had signed an inter-governmental agreement with Russia to co-develop the next generation FGFA. It was followed by the $295 million (`1,483 crore) preliminary design contract (PDC) in December 2010. The overall FGFA project cost for making all the 127 fighters in India was pegged at around $25 billion.

The preliminary design stage of the FGFA programme was completed in June 2013 based on a contract signed in December 2010 with the Russian side.

As per the Inter-Governmental Agreement (IGA) signed in October 2007, Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) is the designated implementation organisation from the Indian side. HAL is supported by agencies, including Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) and Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR).

The programme requires further $6 billion towards its research and development contract. Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar-led defence acquisition council has to give its approval for the R&D contract. It is believed that the delivery of FGFA to the IAF will begin only after nearly eight years from the start of the R&D contract.

“The ministry is in a dilemma over the future of the program after resistance from the IAF. But simultaneously, the Indian government has already spent a sizeable amount of Rs 1,500 crore on the program. And if the program does not make, spent money might go in waste,” said an official. This deal created controversy during 2011, when a clause was inserted in violation of the defence procurement policy to give contract to Russia to provide International Private Leased Circuit (IPLC) bandwidth connectivity between Bangalore-Moscow-Irkutsk to lay communication lines between the two partners.

IAF’s depleting combat strength has been a cause of concern as it is down to 34 fighter squadrons against 42 of its authorised strength based on certain projections in the next couple of years. IAF is getting four squadrons of Su-30 and subsequently indigenously built Light Combat aircraft Tejas is expected to fill the critical requirement of the force.

Collision Course

■ IAF claims developed engine of FGFA was not reliable

■ Inadequate radar and stealth features

■ Huge cost over-run

■ India’s reduced share. Lack of participation by IAF in the design phase

■ IAF apprehensive that Russia will not share technology
 

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
India's Biggest $25 Billion Defence Deal to Crash Land

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Here ya go B-787, the moment we've all been waiting for, and PAK-FA/FGFA's problems spelled out in plain English! This from the IAF, and that my boy is OFFICIAL, not from the govt yakker's, but from the IAF. Poor Radar, Lousy Stealth, krappy engine reliability! not good, not good at all
 

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
Here ya go B-787, the moment we've all been waiting for, and PAK-FA/FGFA's problems spelled out in plain English! This from the IAF, and that my boy is OFFICIAL, not from the govt yakker's, but from the IAF. Poor Radar, Lousy Stealth, krappy engine reliability! not good, not good at all

OK that's the what, now some people are wondering WHY? the Indians have not been allowed near the cockpit of PAK-FA?? the truth is .................. the standard garden variety Flanker is SO GOOD that there is little doubt the SU-35 will kick PAK-FA's butt in a furball, and those Indian SU-30 MKI's are very close, with their canards and thrust vectoring!

Those Levcons are very cool, and I admire the Russian ingenuity, but the RuAF has cuts its proposed purchase to 12 initial PAK-FA for a test and eval squadron??? at the same time buying 48 additional SU-35s.....Those tall vertical stabs and rudders are very effective, particularly when coupled with that 3D OVT...in fact, in an up-close and personal mano a mano, strictly WVR, the SU-35 would give the Raptor a run for its money, and I for one would love to see that, somebody who is a Jedi-Master in the SU-35 against his peer in the Raptor.

Now as a pilot, the Raptor does have a significant advantage in thrust,,,, So???

the factory Sukhoi test pilots would NEVER talk, they are professionals, the RuAF boys are another story, and once they get their hands on PAK-FA we will know what they think.
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
India’s work share in FGFA research and development and other aspects of the multi-billion dollar project at the moment is nearly 10 per cent, even though Delhi is bearing 50 per cent of the project cost.

Somebody is getting "rear ended" in a bad way.:p;)
 

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
Note the J-20 programme only took around 7 years from first flight to the initial production aircraft that we see today.

I also wouldn't be surprised if the J-20 programme has spent less than $6billion in total during the entire R&D phase so far.

That puts into perspective the further $6billion and 8years that Indian would need for the FGFA.
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
RuAF has cuts its proposed purchase to 12 initial PAK-FA for a test and eval squadron???
These 12 for a combat Sqn actual with some others for TES, Weapons Squadron.

IIRC initialy planned 214 T-50, now 144 or 127 but always same year about for introduction 2020/25.

But mainly AF which is the 4th for combat aicrafts have 830 need and fast replacements for
120 Mig-21 retired for 2017
85 Mig-27 " " 2018
125 Mig-21 Bison 2022/25
And normaly in ~ 2022 max 120 Tejas in service, then with Rafale... very possible a new order of Su-30MKI 40/50 ? idealy more, build under license maybe and for a very capable fighter he do good money 55 mill $.
 
Last edited:

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Multifunctional fighter Su-30MKI Indian Air Force clears spectacular volley bomb load of 26 high-explosive bombs FAB-250 caliber 250 kg during a demonstration exercise "Iron Fist-2016" in the Indian range Pokhran March 18, 2016.


To admit I can't understand such actions ?? To load one of the most capable modern fighter - similar to the T-50 prototype recently - with 1950s/60s style dumd high-drag bombs is simply plain "dumb" !
 
Top