These are just equally broad justifications for labels that do not explain why voters voted the way they did. If you are saying HK voters are only voting based on labels not actual policies or actions then that is sufficient but you are claiming otherwise. Again, you are changing what you/article are saying from 60% supported the violence (untrue) to 60% supported the pan-Dems (true).
Can you just stop putting your words in my mouth? What labels, in the US, the Democratic party tends to do better in Blacks, women, and minority. Is that a fact? yes.
Again, Can you just stop putting your words in my mouth? My position has always been the same. 56.7% supported pan-Dems camp which legitimatized the rioters and gave them the mandate to continue the riots. Since voters knew perfectly well that the pan-Dems camp supported the rioters, then voting for the pan-Dems camp is equal to giving a tacit approval to the rioters or hint that the voters believe the government and police should be blamed for the violent protests not the protesters.
Again you are putting words in my mouth. All along I have said there is not enough information to come to the conclusions you have. I do not need to come to alternate conclusions but I can propose equally plausible theories that actually dig deeper into the issues. Again if you are saying HK voters only vote by labels then that is fine but you are trying to claim more than that.
The results of six legislative elections are not enough to make any conclusions. "Again you are putting words in my mouth", I never said that HK voters only vote by labels. I just pointed out more people in the past six legislative elections have voted for the pan-Dems camp than the pro-establishment.
That depends on voter turnout in all those elections, demographics across time, and what the hot topics were at the time of those elections. Again I am pointing out that you are making claims without sufficient evidence and I am not making any claims myself. That we are just putting forth equally plausible theories.
The turnout for the six legislative elections are higher than the district elections except the 2019 HK district election which is the highest turnout ever for any election. That can be looked up by googling for a few minutes. I don't need to provide any additional evidence. The results of six legislative elections have shown more HK people have voted for the pan-Dems camp. That's a fact. That is the only thing that I needed to prove.