H-6 Bomber Aircraft Discussions

Discussion in 'Air Force' started by F40Racer, Sep 11, 2006.

  1. Lama
    Offline

    Lama New Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2018
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    28
    For a further range.In Chinese "WP" is 涡轮喷气 means turbojet engine.It has a higher fuel consumption than the turbofan engine. I've read from a Chinese military magazine that in test H6I has a range of more than 8000km(maybe 9000km I can't make sure).And what about the original TU16 ?
     
    mys_721tx likes this.
  2. asif iqbal
    Online

    asif iqbal Brigadier

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2006
    Messages:
    8,541
    Likes Received:
    8,594
    What was H6I used for ?
     
  3. Lama
    Offline

    Lama New Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2018
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    28
    Just try to build a bomber with turbofan engines.For some reasons(maybe less practical or hard to get engines after 1989 or too expensive),PLAAF only build one.
     
  4. mys_721tx
    Online

    mys_721tx Junior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2016
    Messages:
    151
    Likes Received:
    327
    The Spey on H-6I comes from CAAC's spare engine for Trident. China got the license for Spey in 1975 and 4 prototypes were assembled at Xi'an Aero-Engine Corporation with the help from RR. The domestic produced model is designated as WS-9. The licensing fee was too expensive and China simply didn't have the technology for full domestic production. This coupled with the defense budget cuts in the 1980s resulted in the cancellation of H-6I.

    If not for JH-7, the WS-9 project would have been abandoned. In 1990s, when the UK retires their F-4s, some of their engines were sold to China as scraps while still had some operational lives left. Those Spey's were used to equip JH-7. In 2000, WS-9 finally achieved full domestic production.
     
    AleDucat, antiterror13 and Lama like this.
  5. Deino
    Offline

    Deino Brigadier
    Staff Member Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2005
    Messages:
    9,532
    Likes Received:
    23,920
    jobjed likes this.
  6. Bltizo
    Online

    Bltizo Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2008
    Messages:
    12,168
    Likes Received:
    15,016
    It's from the XAC/AVIC video earlier in the year, a CGI. I would wonder if Huitong has a reason for attributing it as real.
     
  7. huitong
    Offline

    huitong New Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2014
    Messages:
    95
    Likes Received:
    314
    I said “...but it has not been confirmed.” Does this sound “real” to you?
     
  8. Bltizo
    Online

    Bltizo Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2008
    Messages:
    12,168
    Likes Received:
    15,016
    I think you misunderstand me.

    When I write "I would wonder if Huitong has a reason for attributing it as real" -- what I mean is why do you think that the particular clip of the video of H-6 launching YJ-12 internally is credible (aka "real")?
    Putting it another way, are there additional rumours of H-6J being able to carry YJ-12 internally outside of that video clip, or is it simply the video clip being interpreted as legitimate?


    I'm not saying you're claiming it is "real" or "confirmed" that H-6J is able to carry YJ-12 internally, but rather whether you're saying that part of the video itself is "real" or not.
     
  9. huitong
    Offline

    huitong New Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2014
    Messages:
    95
    Likes Received:
    314
    I was just presenting it as a possibility because it’s from an AVIC video. AVIC may have lots of military secrets to keep, but they don’t have a track record of spreading misinformation.
     
    mr.bean and Deino like this.
  10. Bltizo
    Online

    Bltizo Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2008
    Messages:
    12,168
    Likes Received:
    15,016
    Fair enough. I raised the point because when the video came out earlier this year it seemed like that internal YJ-12 was received skeptically or not mentioned at all, making it seem like the consensus was that it was a mistake.
     
Loading...

Share This Page