H-6 Bomber Aircraft Discussions

davidau

Senior Member
Registered Member
China H-6K..carrying modern long-range KD-20 (CJ-20) cruise missile, with range 1500-2000 Km & other medium range missile anti-ship missile, with 6 missile hanging pads...
..recent exercises H-6K carried 18 bombs/missiles.. it has been configured carry up to carry 36 weapons of different types...

193_235665_747398.jpg


193_235667_742129.jpg


193_235669_826350.jpg


193_235671_595331.jpg

...also can carry 4 large medium range anti-ship missile KD/63 or KD 63B....
 

schenkus

Junior Member
Registered Member
Reportedly an IFR-capable H-6K had its maiden flight in December ...
View attachment 36351


maybe this one ??

View attachment 36352

What is the huge missile below the fuselage ? (it looks even bigger in the second picture)


another question: would refueling an H-6K have a practical use in war or might this
be a test bed for a refueling mechanism meant for other big aircraft (Y-20 / a future VLO bomber) ?
 

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
What is the huge missile below the fuselage ? (it looks even bigger in the second picture)


another question: would refueling an H-6K have a practical use in war or might this
be a test bed for a refueling mechanism meant for other big aircraft (Y-20 / a future VLO bomber) ?

It's speculated that the new variant would be deployed as anti-ship ballistic missile platform.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

C4oQvBNUYAA-5iW.jpg

1 reply5 retweets2 likes
 

schenkus

Junior Member
Registered Member
It's speculated that the new variant would be deployed as anti-ship ballistic missile platform.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

C4oQvBNUYAA-5iW.jpg

1 reply5 retweets2 likes

Would this be used to increase the range of the missiles (though I guess that using a longer range, higher speed missile might be a better idea) or is this supposed to be like american cold war SAC bombers with some of them always circling in the air where a first strike would not hit them ?

To me both options somehow have a bit of a 50s cold war feel.
 

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
Would this be used to increase the range of the missiles (though I guess that using a longer range, higher speed missile might be a better idea) or is this supposed to be like american cold war SAC bombers with some of them always circling in the air where a first strike would not hit them ?
To me both options somehow have a bit of a 50s cold war feel.

Beside those 2 reasons It could be to increase the robustness of the system in case the supporting infrastructure is down. You still have alternatives, It is all speculative

With underground great wall, those launcher are hard to detect, since there are so many exit point that can be hidden
Airport are easier to neutralized
 
Top