Miscellaneous News

baykalov

Senior Member
Registered Member
Noam Chomsky: We're Repeating Afghanistan in Ukraine

Professor Noam Chomsky has a stark prediction for the future of humanity if the US refuses to cooperate with other countries:

“It is absolutely necessary for the great powers to cooperate if there’s going to be any hope for survival,” he explains. “China, the US, Russia, they have to be cooperating on the major issues of the day: climate, nuclear war, pandemics. You work on them together or you all fall over the cliff together.”

And while cooperation sounds like a smart idea, Chomsky doubts the US will go along.

“The US orders allies to follow its rules-based international order while China calls for the UN-based international order. And the US doesn’t accept that for a very good reason: the UN rules out US foreign policy explicitly. The UN charter bans the threat or use of force in international affairs. Can you think of a US president who hasn’t engaged in a threat or use of force?”

This sparks an analysis of US censorship and how the government can suppress the truth without throwing us in gulags.

“Read things carefully that do come out: the Washington Post had a long, comprehensive article in which they reviewed in great detail the background for the war. Nothing in it about possible negotiations. They don’t want it on the agenda.”

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
Waiting for some cringe Hong Konger to excessively mourn the queen...:rolleyes:
Bro excuse me BUT I do. :( I Just Can't " LET IT GO". :p

This was one of Freddie's final public appearances at the 1990 BRIT Awards alongside Queen bandmates Brian May and Roger Taylor. (Photo by John Rodgers/Redferns)
This was one of Freddie's final public appearances at the 1990 BRIT Awards alongside Queen bandmates Brian May and Roger Taylor. (Photo by John Rodgers/Redferns). Picture:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

supercat

Colonel
Oh, the CCP's gonna collapse if it has less than a billion people to rule over? LOL China's birth rate and population decline are more than overcompensated for but the increase in per capita output. China's growth never depended on population growth; it came from poor people getting rich, villagers becoming educated city-slickers. Where there used to be 14 people who average $10, there are now 14 people who average $20, and in the future, it may be 10 people who average $40. That's how China can grow regardless of a reduction in population. Countries that depend on more people to have more GDP are screwed but countries like China that depend on qualitative growth have no ceiling; it can end up with 700B people and be twice the strength of the US.
Yes, China's per capita productivity growth will more than enough to compensate the very gradual reduction in population. BTW, all you hear is China's "demographic time bomb" in the Western MSM, and you rarely hear this:

Exclusive-German economy ministry reviews measures to curb China business​


BERLIN (Reuters) - Germany's economy ministry is considering a raft of measures to make business with China less attractive as it seeks to reduce its dependency on Asia's economic superpower, two people familiar with the matter told Reuters.

The measures could include reducing or even scrapping investment and export guarantees for China and no longer promoting trade fairs and manager training there, those people said. Loans from state lender KfW could be re-directed to projects in other Asian countries, such as Indonesia, in line with attempts to diversify trade and increase business with democracies.

The ministry is also considering screening not just Chinese investments in Germany but also German investments in China, one of the sources told Reuters.

In addition, the government is considering submitting a complaint to the World Trade Organization about what it views as unfair Chinese trade practices, together with the Group of Seven wealthy democracies, a separate source said.

“We should show Beijing that we are willing to fight for the principles of fairness,” the source said.


An economy ministry spokesperson declined to comment on these specific measures but said the ministry was checking targeted measures "to support the diversification (of trade and supply chains) and the strengthening of resilience".

The ministry had already decided to no longer give investment guarantees for projects in the Xinjiang region or to companies with business relations there given concerns about human rights abuses there and lack of reliable information.

In May, the economy ministry denied Volkswagen guarantees for new investments in China because of concerns over Xinjiang.
Chinese foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.

The plans mark a departure from Berlin's policies under former Chancellor Angela Merkel, who took vast business delegations with her on her frequent trips to China, and oversaw a boom in Chinese-German economic ties.

China became Germany's top trade partner in 2016, with a volume of trade of over 245 bln euros last year, helping fuel growth in Europe's largest, export-driven, economy.

German carmakers are especially heavily exposed to the Chinese market, with Volkswagen making around half its profits there. Germany, and Europe, also rely on China for certain raw materials, such as rare earths.

In recent years, German politicians and business leaders have already advocated greater diversification in trade with Asia in response to Beijing's tightening grip over the society and the economy under President Xi Jinping.

Shortly before leaving office last year, Merkel told Reuters she may have been naive at first in some areas of cooperation with China.


An economy ministry spokesperson declined to comment on these specific measures but said the ministry was checking targeted measures "to support the diversification (of trade and supply chains) and the strengthening of resilience".

The ministry had already decided to no longer give investment guarantees for projects in the Xinjiang region or to companies with business relations there given concerns about human rights abuses there and lack of reliable information.

In May, the economy ministry denied Volkswagen guarantees for new investments in China because of concerns over Xinjiang.

Chinese foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.

The plans mark a departure from Berlin's policies under former Chancellor Angela Merkel, who took vast business delegations with her on her frequent trips to China, and oversaw a boom in Chinese-German economic ties.

China became Germany's top trade partner in 2016, with a volume of trade of over 245 bln euros last year, helping fuel growth in Europe's largest, export-driven, economy.

German carmakers are especially heavily exposed to the Chinese market, with Volkswagen making around half its profits there. Germany, and Europe, also rely on China for certain raw materials, such as rare earths.

In recent years, German politicians and business leaders have already advocated greater diversification in trade with Asia in response to Beijing's tightening grip over the society and the economy under President Xi Jinping.

Shortly before leaving office last year, Merkel told Reuters she may have been naive at first in some areas of cooperation with China.

NEW CHINA STRATEGY
The new government agreed a tougher line on China in its coalition deal, vowing to reduce strategic dependencies on its "systemic rival", and mentioning for the first time matters sensitive for Bejing, such as Taiwan and Hong Kong. Chancellor Olaf Scholz made his first Asia visit to Japan, unlike Merkel.

Berlin is working on a national security strategy that is due to mention China, and a specific China strategy that it intends to publish next year, the sources said.

The Greens junior coalition party - in charge of both the economy and foreign ministries - says it is particularly concerned about human rights abuses and the risks of being beholden to an increasingly assertive authoritarian state, Russia being a case in point.

"We cannot ... afford to just behave following the motto 'business first', without taking into account the long-term risks and dependencies," Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock told the annual congress of ambassadors this week.

"In reality we never received cheap gas from Russia," she said. "We paid twice or three times as much for every cubic meter of Russian gas in our national security."

Scholz's Social Democrats are more reticent about rocking the boat, sources said. Scholz has warned of negative consequences of any "decoupling" from China and expressed confidence that companies are already diversifying.

Companies and corporate associations are increasingly making their concerns about a tougher China policy public, arguing for help diversifying trade rather than confrontational steps in such an important market.

"We cannot isolate China," said Hildegard Mueller, the head of the German autos association VDA, told digital outlet Table Media. "That would be naive – and fatal, both politically and economically."

Source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Aha, they consider ganging up with the G7 at the WTO to coerce the Chinese government because 'unfair economic practices'. This means coercing us to change our economic model to the 'universal' neoliberal free market model which means no industry and technological policies, a huge raft of state subsidies or state owned enterprises or heavily reduced otherwise its unfair. Bow to the universalist economic and political model of our Lords.
What's the point? The current crop of German politicians is really incompetent. They are completely oblivious to the fact that with the advent of the NEV revolution, the most important German industry, the auto industry, is losing its most important global market, the market of China. They should help German companies to expand business in China instead of being a perfect lackey of the U.S. and do its bidding by hurting the business of their own national champions.

Some American policy makers are really delusional and live in their own parallel universe.
 

tygyg1111

Captain
Registered Member
I do ponder what makes people like Habeck, Baerbock and Scholz so blatantly ignorant, I mean they as germans do not necessarily need to love the FRG, but treason for money or whatever is a cowardly deed.
Their cognitively incapacitated coalition of the willing but incapable, actively gamble with the lives and livelyhoods of 83000000 people.....

And that's just for germanistan alone, what are the repercussion for the whole of europe when the strongest economy on the continent is content with masturbating at -5 C° to prevent frostbite?


What ever kind of Crack they take in the Bundestag, must be the good stuff.
Perhaps they have discovered fentanyl
 

emblem21

Major
Registered Member
Hahahahahahaha, starting to regret your choices yet Nathan, your idiot actions in HK and you running away to a sinking ship when the queen just died. The fate of a fat rat and ultimately, a small ant bump on the path to greatness for China. Prepare to become irrelevant, maybe some one should send you some copium so you can cope just a little bit and ironically, Joshua Wong might have it better then you in the coming years, at least he will be alive to see China's rise but you Nathan, prepare for a cold winter with little food and the prospects of being 'purged' when your usefulness ends completely.--- This is what I am thinking towards that worthless traitor.
 
Top