Miscellaneous News

Temstar

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Looks like the UN is now politicized, when Trump comes back in 2024, the P5 might as well disband the UN.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Imagine you're not the US, and the US is coming up to you, pointing at this UN report and saying and saying "you should stop trading in anything to do with Xinjiang because muh crime against humanity"

And just as you are pondering upon the suggestion, you also see this news:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
How would you feel?
 

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Looks like the UN is now politicized, when Trump comes back in 2024, the P5 might as well disband the UN.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Meanwhile Xinjiang exports to the US hit a two year high. ;) So the Americans are the culprit for the forced labor being enforce on the Uygur...lol

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!




11 hours ago — Xinjiang's top individual export to the US in July was Christmas decorations, according to the Chinese customs data, worth more than US$1.5 ...
 

BlackWindMnt

Major
Registered Member
Meanwhile Xinjiang exports to the US hit a two year high. ;) So the Americans are the culprit for the forced labor being enforce on the Uygur...lol

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!




11 hours ago — Xinjiang's top individual export to the US in July was Christmas decorations, according to the Chinese customs data, worth more than US$1.5 ...
The west is so incompetent, my "haha" emoji reaction is getting overused in this thread...
 

JebKerman

Junior Member
Registered Member
We have actual cost breakdowns so there's no guessing involved.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Note the cost breakdown. Most of the cost is in non-silicon related components of the photovoltaic module. Most of the decline in cost is 1.) amortizing R&D and 2.) declining rest of module costs. Silicon and wafer processing costs are not changing much. This is not surprising since wafer processing and silicon costs draw on the existing semiconductor industry which already has best practices known for silicon production and wafer processing.

NREL also makes very optimistic assumptions like average 22% efficiency while
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, so real costs are more in line with their 2019 estimates.

More estimates on payback time, which is a more direct measure of EROEI than currency cost:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Consensus is 6-10 years at best as of 2021, a far cry from the 3 month payback time for nuclear and hydro.

As for why I'm skeptical, without doxxing myself, it's sufficient to say I'm not an uneducated or merely self educated layman in photovoltaics. In the course of my association with the field, I found the amount of overhyping, overselling and overpromising to be excessive.
I'm sorry there's no way nuclear and hydro has a 3 month payback. With nukes you'd be lucky if you get the money back before the plant retires. It costs like £/$10-20 billion to build one, how the hell does it make £/$10 billion worth of electricity in 3 months?
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
I'm sorry there's no way nuclear and hydro has a 3 month payback. With nukes you'd be lucky if you get the money back before the plant retires. It costs like £/$10-20 billion to build one, how the hell does it make £/$10 billion worth of electricity in 3 months?
its EROEI payback, not total cost payback. See source.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Energy payback time. If 3.1 PJ is taken as the energy capital cost of setting up (with centrifuge enrichment), then at 27 PJ/yr output the initial energy investment is repaid in about six weeks at full power. Voss (2002) has 3 months. Construction time for nuclear plants is 4-5 years.
See table 1 for the energy accounting.

In relation to total cost, much of the cost of a nuclear/hydro plant is not in the energy input but in things like land acquisition, regulatory compliance, environmental testing, etc.
 

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
We have actual cost breakdowns so there's no guessing involved.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Note the cost breakdown. Most of the cost is in non-silicon related components of the photovoltaic module. Most of the decline in cost is 1.) amortizing R&D and 2.) declining rest of module costs. Silicon and wafer processing costs are not changing much. This is not surprising since wafer processing and silicon costs draw on the existing semiconductor industry which already has best practices known for silicon production and wafer processing.

You're not answering the question. Since you accept that there has been large improvements in cost and solar panel efficiency, what do you think the real EROEI is now? It obviously isn't the old 7-10 figure from 2014.


NREL also makes very optimistic assumptions like average 22% efficiency while
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, so real costs are more in line with their 2019 estimates.

More estimates on payback time, which is a more direct measure of EROEI than currency cost:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Consensus is 6-10 years at best as of 2021, a far cry from the 3 month payback time for nuclear and hydro.

As for why I'm skeptical, without doxxing myself, it's sufficient to say I'm not an uneducated or merely self educated layman in photovoltaics. In the course of my association with the field, I found the amount of overhyping, overselling and overpromising to be excessive.

What you're talking about is irrelevant to the original point I'm making, which is that Solar can provide enough energy to displace an increasingly scarce hydrocarbon like oil.

1. You're also mixing up financial payback versus the energy payback

2. You're using links and references which are irrelevant.

You referenced residential solar payback calculators designed for residential use electricity profiles. But it's clear from Lazard/Bloomberg that residential solar is far more expensive than commercial or utility scale solar. In addition, the US levies a high import duty and tariffs on Chinese solar imports, but the rest of the world doesn't. The US is not representative of the global solar industry.

2. I was very specific that the combination of [solar + electric vehicle] is far superior to [oil + petrol engine car]. That is both from a cost and aggregate energy efficiency perspective.

Solar generates very low-cost electricity during a short period during the middle of the day. In the current electricity grid structure, this results in "excess" electricity.

But when you have electric cars with batteries that need to be charged anyway, the electricity use profile changes dramatically. Solar electricity generated during the day can be productively sent to electric car batteries.

The fact remains that utility-scale solar electricity bids are down to 1-3cents per KWh in places like Saudi Arabia, Portugal, Nevada and Arizona. And that the motors in electric cars are over 80% efficient in converting electricity into movement.

And looking to the future, we can expect to see significant improvements to solar and electric vehicles.
 

JebKerman

Junior Member
Registered Member
its EROEI payback, not total cost payback. See source.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

See table 1 for the energy accounting.

In relation to total cost, much of the cost of a nuclear/hydro plant is not in the energy input but in things like land acquisition, regulatory compliance, environmental testing, etc.
But that's like saying apart from the upfront cost, maintenance cost, and fuel cost a Ferrari F430 is a better than a Wuling Hongguan van.

The problem with nuclear is it's too expensive, and ROI is too long. That's why all the nuke companies are bankrupt and only china can build new ones.
 

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
its EROEI payback, not total cost payback. See source.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

See table 1 for the energy accounting.

In relation to total cost, much of the cost of a nuclear/hydro plant is not in the energy input but in things like land acquisition, regulatory compliance, environmental testing, etc.

The world-nuclear analysis does list a 3 month energy payback which you've quoted.

But given that a modern nuclear plant has a minimum lifespan of 40 years, that is an EROEI of 120, which sounds absurdly high.

In comparison, the 2014 Sciencedirect paper which you previously referenced has an nuclear EROEI of 14.

As I've said before, you need good data to work with.
 
Top