i cant understand, who is this black bum? Never heard of her. Is she something like important?
i cant understand, who is this black bum? Never heard of her. Is she something like important?
It's ironic because they talk about openness being an important ingredient to the metaverse yet they think about the metaverse through only a political lens. It's like how Westerners are brainwashed into thinking political freedom is important for innovation. How do they explain how the West is in so much fear of Chinese innovation that they're openly discussing how they have to destroy China's economy to stop it from beating the West? Apparently China has to open up to new ideas especially from the West but they're working to close out China in their world. That's why TikTok is beating them while nothing new is coming out of Silicon Valley. You see US social media platforms trying replicate TikTok because they didn't think of those ideas. They're the ones who want to control content. Their world has always been only a one-way street. If your life has been spent living in a 6X6 cage, they can spin being able move around that twelve square feet as being freedom especially if that's the world you've only known.
Western experts use to say that China would restrict internet speeds to less than 1MB per sec because any more Beijing would lose control of communication between people in China. China today has one of the highest internet speeds in the world while the West is mired in 4G. The West only thinks about politics and why China has to open up to it because they want to be able to lie and manipulate to the Chinese people like they've already successfully done with their own. Just because they say they're for freedom does it actually make it so? Look at Republicans who hide behind freedom and democracy when they trying to deny from everyone else by enacting laws to make harder for others to vote. Ans they want to make everyone believe they're not lying and they care about the Chinese people's best interest and not theirs only...
Oops, didn't work...damn it.
Sanctions war isn’t going as planned – The Economist
The expected knockout blow from anti-Russia restrictions “has not materialized,” the UK magazine reports
![]()
People walking on the Red Square in Moscow. © AFP / Natalia Kolesnikova
The harsh sanctions imposed on Russia by the West over the conflict in Ukraine have so far been unable to deliver the desired result, The Economist magazine has acknowledged, adding that the strategy has “flaws.”
“Worryingly, so far the sanctions war is not going as well as expected,” the British publication in an article on Thursday, insisting that the effectiveness of economic restrictions on Moscow “is key to the outcome of the Ukraine war.”
“Russia’s GDP will shrink by 6% in 2022, reckons the IMF, much less than the 15% drop many expected in March... Energy sales will generate a current-account surplus of $265 billion this year, the world’s second-largest after China. After a crunch, Russia’s financial system has stabilized and the country is finding new suppliers for some imports, including China,” it pointed out.
At the same time, the energy crisis, which has been provoked by the sanctions war, “may trigger a recession” in Europe, where gas prices spiked by another 20% this week, according to the British magazine.
This all means that the expected “knockout blow [from restricting Russia] has not materialized,” The Economist said.
“The unipolar moment of the 1990s, when America’s supremacy was uncontested, is long gone, and the West’s appetite to use military force has waned since the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan,” it acknowledged.
Economic restrictions “seemed” to be the new tool that would allow the US, EU and its allies to project their power globally, but the conflict in Ukraine has revealed that “the sanctions weapon has flaws,” it said.
One of those flaws is “the time lag,” the magazine continued. For example, “blocking [Russia’s] access to tech the West monopolizes takes years to bite,” it added.
The Economist suggested that isolation from Western markets could only “cause havoc in Russia… on a three- to five-year horizon.”
“The biggest flaw [of sanctions] is that full or partial embargoes are not being enforced by over 100 countries with 40% of world GDP,” the outlet insisted. “A globalized economy is good at adapting to shocks and opportunities, particularly as most countries have no desire to enforce Western policy.”
With economic curbs failing to cripple the Russian economy, one should “discard any illusions that sanctions offer the West a cheap and asymmetric way to confront China” if it decides to use force against Taiwan, The Economist warned.
I agree with one thing, something never changes, like My "waste"rn detection formula which conclusively states- An wastern will always be more well versed of other nation's history than it's own fake manufactured nation.She's a nobody miny-mo on the international stage, but she became (in)famous because of this:
View attachment 96312
I agree with one thing, something never changes, like My "waste"rn detection formula which conclusively states- An wastern will always be more well versed of other nation's history than it's own fake manufactured nation.
I'm disappointed with Chen's retweet, it should've been "B-tch please" with a native american person's image.
Its too late for the West to contain China, their best bet, and only realistic hope, is to do a MAD scorched earth and take us (those that are left) all back to the Stone Age.