J-XY/J-35 carrier-borne fighter thread

zyun8288

Junior Member
Yeah but the fuselage, especially the cockpit region is quite obviously the same as the fc-31 2.0 Guess they reused the fuselage, made new wings, painted the whole thing green and called it a day.
But folded wing is a much more obvious difference from fc31 2.0.
 

Schwerter_

Junior Member
Registered Member
But folded wing is a much more obvious difference from fc31 2.0.
Excuse me but I don’t really see your point here. That model, while labeled J-35 as you pointed out, has the same fuselage as a fc31 2.0, and is clearly different in that regard than the real J-35. Most likely the manufacturer decided to reuse at least part of the fuselage from previous models and changed the wings and paint to make it look more or less like the J-35.
 

zyun8288

Junior Member
Excuse me but I don’t really see your point here. That model, while labeled J-35 as you pointed out, has the same fuselage as a fc31 2.0, and is clearly different in that regard than the real J-35. Most likely the manufacturer decided to reuse at least part of the fuselage from previous models and changed the wings and paint to make it look more or less like the J-35.
My point is that the model is closer to J35 than to FC31 2.0, because it has folded wings and it has the J35 label by the manufacturer. It’s just that simple and clear.

whether the model is accurate or not is a trivial matter.
 
Last edited:

Schwerter_

Junior Member
Registered Member
My point is that the model is closer to J35 than to FC31 2.0, because it has folded wings and it has the J35 label by the manufacturer. It’s just that simple and clear.

whether the model is accurate or not is a trivial matter.
It’s not that big of a deal anyway and I don’t really care at this point. You’re right in saying that it’s closer to the J-35, and Siegecrossbow is right in saying its fuselage is identical to the fc-31 ver 2.0 so everybody is right it’s just a matter of perspective
 

zyun8288

Junior Member
It’s not that big of a deal anyway and I don’t really care at this point. You’re right in saying that it’s closer to the J-35, and Siegecrossbow is right in saying its fuselage is identical to the fc-31 ver 2.0 so everybody is right it’s just a matter of perspective
Sorry to reply on this just one last time. You forget the most important perspective: the manufacturer calls this model J35.
 
Top