escobar
Brigadier
PRC will continue convince themselves that US adheres to the one-China principle
The problem is that the US is more willing to act in a irrational manner. Imagine if China sanctioned GM. Half of GM's revenues would dry out and most likely doom the company. What would happen to Apple? App developers, pension funds, other investors, they would all take a massive hit if something were to happen. There was a WSJ headline that said the "US needs to show it is willing to go to nuclear war", this is the kind of thinking you are working against.
US plans to counter China ‘at risk because of allies’ reluctance to host missile systems’
- A report says Washington’s treaty allies in the Indo-Pacific would be reluctant to provoke China by offering permanent bases for intermediate missiles
- The best option may be to help Japan develop its own anti-ship missiles, the analysis concludes
Cheung Mong, an associate professor at Waseda University in Japan, said Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida might welcome the other alternatives because the new government does not want to provoke Beijing, despite the importance of the US alliance.
“The current reality of Tokyo’s defence plan is: it attempts to use US military power to defend the Diaoyu-Senkaku Islands,” he said referring to the uninhabited islands in the East China Sea which both China and Japan claim.
But it doesn’t want to be dragged into the Taiwan issue too deeply, which is the opposite of what the US wants to do.”
They want an outlet to vent their anger for their own failures. Republicans and Democrats (stealthily) are happily using the China card to avoid having to shoulder the responsibility of the covid response and the economic mess they createdI expect hate crime against Asians would go up especially after relationship between China and the US would further deteriorated.
The bauxite ore isn't particularly rare. And Russia isn't a substantial miner of bauxite. I don't think Ukraine even has any mines. Most of it comes from Guinea or Brazil.
I agree.Washington has been saving serious sanctions for this company in particular, it’s trivial to get support for sanctions against Chinese spy-tech.
Washington WANTs China to respond, because they can win a moral battle against a spy camera company.
That's a novel approach and I quite like it tbh. You are right that targeting Hikivision is quire smart from them because well... who is really want to be seen protecting a spy camera company.. This allows the deep state to punch through business lobby resistance and any possible Democratic party or allied countries resistance by waving the "human rights" flagChina should respond by sanctioning the Private American Prison industry and the products and services they provide, citing slave labor and human rights abuses, citing a specific measure in the International Labor agreements that China just ratified maybe. This puts China at the moral high ground, even in the minds of americans.
All these are well thought proposals. I never bothered to think about possible targets beyond hard-hitting their big companies. But this new approach on sanctioning these kinds of businesses is an idea worth exploring..China can escalate by sanctioning other such industries as the anti-abortion organizations, insulin makers, environmental polluters, hunting organizations, gun makers, drug paraphernalia manufacturers and more hilarious industries that just make America look ridiculous.
CCP should talk about investigating Hunter Biden’s alleged corruption with China. Take initiative on the moral high ground. Looks bad for Dems regardless of the outcome.I agree.
That's a novel approach and I quite like it tbh. You are right that targeting Hikivision is quire smart from them because well... who is really want to be seen protecting a spy camera company.. This allows the deep state to punch through business lobby resistance and any possible Democratic party or allied countries resistance by waving the "human rights" flag
The prison labour counter, proposal is also smart move. You can hold the moral ground and give some cover so that lobbies and special interests groups can find a narrative to resist against the US deep state.
All these are well thought proposals. I never bothered to think about possible targets beyond hard-hitting their big companies. But this new approach on sanctioning these kinds of businesses is an idea worth exploring..
If I may add another benefit for China, is that this way China would bring to light the US' dirty laundry in front of the whole world (systemic competition), while introducing more political infighting to US politics because Democrats would have a resurgent progressive wing demanding to resolve these issues. Finally, Democratic / Republican schism would be widened as more friction and spotlight would be introduced in their policies and how they differ
Excellent stuff
India deals a blow to US’ ‘democracy’ narrative
On Tuesday, Denmark's Prime Minister, Mette Frederiksen, urged her visiting Indian counterpart to try to "influence Russia" to end the war. However, no change of tone on the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict has been heard from New Delhi.
A "democratic" nation recognized by the West should stand with them, but India is not doing so. Against this backdrop, Washington is trying to use its old trick to divide the world into blocs under its "democratic or authoritarian" narrative while keeping pressuring New Delhi.
India, the world's "largest democracy" as Washington has been trying to portray, has parted ways with the US and its core Western allies over the Ukraine crisis. It is, instead maintaining ties with one of Washington's "authoritarian" rivals to advance its own interests. This is a huge blow to the US's threadbare democracy card.