This is more serious.
I don't understand why the army is still using T-59's, t-62's and T-69 tanks. As far as I am concerned those are totally out of date... I think those must be decommissioned and scrapped.
I don't think those army tanks can do much on a modern battle. Remember the T-72 Tanks of Iraq lost against the Abrams of US, even given the fact that the Iraqi's might not be well trained. T-69 and older versions are more out to date...
Sine China already has new type of tanks, why not mass produce it at a higher rate to replace the aging tanks? like T-98,99's?
I know it wouldn't be wise to reduce the tanks to 2,000-3,000 given the fact that China has a large land area and huge land border with large number of troops... It is better to be around 8,000-10,000 I think.
But what I am pointing out is replacing the 1950's and 1960's tanks ASAP.
I don't understand why the army is still using T-59's, t-62's and T-69 tanks. As far as I am concerned those are totally out of date... I think those must be decommissioned and scrapped.
I don't think those army tanks can do much on a modern battle. Remember the T-72 Tanks of Iraq lost against the Abrams of US, even given the fact that the Iraqi's might not be well trained. T-69 and older versions are more out to date...
Sine China already has new type of tanks, why not mass produce it at a higher rate to replace the aging tanks? like T-98,99's?
I know it wouldn't be wise to reduce the tanks to 2,000-3,000 given the fact that China has a large land area and huge land border with large number of troops... It is better to be around 8,000-10,000 I think.
But what I am pointing out is replacing the 1950's and 1960's tanks ASAP.