Miscellaneous News

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
What is funny is with all of that, they still do it and calling it "sincerity"
Well, it is more funnier that USA had to literally say that "we speak from position of strength" with all their larger GDP, Military etc. Don't you think? Oh, don't forget that they just run away from Afghanistan few days ago if you want to talk about what is "performative virtue signaling".
 

escobar

Brigadier
Well, it is more funnier that USA had to literally say that "we speak from position of strength" with all their larger GDP, Military etc. Don't you think? Oh, don't forget that they just run away from Afghanistan few days ago if you want to talk about what is "performative virtue signaling".
Are we talking about CN or US? We already know US shameless virtue signaling nonsense lol
 

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
China lost the WTO case against US about the US taking measures to limit the import of solar panel cells in 2018. The case was initiated by China against the US
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

supersnoop

Colonel
Registered Member

emblem21

Major
Registered Member
They fucked up, betting on the wrong horse.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The power shift in Afghanistan and its impact on India's geopolitics have triggered widespread attention in India.

Some voices are very negative. For example, New Delhi-based the Print on August 26 published an article entitled "India backed the wrong horse in Afghanistan, and has gone into a strategic sulk now." Happymon Jacob, associate professor at New Delhi-based Jawaharlal Nehru University, was quoted by Al Jazeera on Sunday saying that "I think India seems to be out of the game in Afghanistan." Some analysts anticipate that India's $3 billion investments in Afghanistan are going down the drain.

India has long been hostile to the Taliban. And the Taliban has attacked Indian targets during the past two decades. As a result, India had ramped up efforts to coordinate with the US-backed Kabul government. This resulted in a vicious circle and deeper animosity between India and the Taliban.

Having long been at odds with Pakistan, India has been attempting to expand its influence in Afghanistan to counter Islamabad. During the past two decades, India has seen Afghanistan as a trump card to play against Pakistan. But the Taliban taking over Afghanistan has now deprived India of this card. Because of the relations between Afghan Taliban and Pakistan and factors related to history, ethnicity and religion, as the Taliban amasses more authority in Afghanistan, they will tilt toward Pakistan when handling relations with India and Pakistan.

Furthermore, in recent days, China's active, neutral, conciliatory and impartial manner toward Afghanistan has been welcomed by many Afghans, including the Taliban. They have recently shown their goodwill toward China. The group said on multiple occasions that it hopes to grow sound relations with China, and looks forward to its participation in Afghanistan's reconstruction and development. They pledged that their country will never allow any force to use the Afghan territory to engage in acts detrimental to China, such as terrorism attack.

The Indian foreign ministry was quoted by Reuters that Indian Ambassador to Qatar Deepak Mittal on Tuesday held talks with Sher Mohammad Abbas Stanekzai, the head of the Taliban's Political Office in Doha. But no information suggests that the Taliban has shown the sort of goodwill it has demonstrated to China. India is also anxious that China's geopolitical influence will grow, which is not good news in the eyes of Indians who are in spat with China.

New Delhi might have been in a helpless position to back "the wrong horse in Afghanistan." Due to its long standing hostility against the Taliban, especially after the US invaded Afghanistan, New Delhi has followed Washington's move closely, cooperating with US-backed Kabul government. However, India's strategic nightmare has finally come true.

Since the Doha agreement signed between the US and Taliban in 2020, some major powers, including the US, have sought various means to be in touch with Taliban leaders. But New Delhi was not among them. The country did not have any official meetings with Taliban leadership prior to the fall of Kabul. This put India into a very passive situation.

Moreover, New Delhi naïvely believed that Washington would not withdraw its troops so promptly and irresponsibly without communicating with its allies and partners. The US' hasty withdrawal from Afghanistan will to some extent shake the Indian strategic community's confidence in the US' credibility as well as the US' ability and willingness to fulfill its commitments to its allies and partners.

However, it will not fundamentally affect India's close strategic cooperation with the US. The root cause of New Delhi inching closer to Washington is to deal with the challenge India has felt from China's rise. New Delhi's frustration with Afghanistan will not alter the intention of mainstream strategic elites in India who advocate upgrading relations with the US into a quasi-alliance relationship. Afghanistan is a small part of India's strategy. India is more concerned with how to handle discord with China and Pakistan. In this regard, New Delhi still heavily relies on Washington.
How long can India imagine itself as a rival to China depends on how good its infrastructure is in regards to handling the rapidly growth population of India verses and whether India has to adequate supply to keep on pretending whilst not doing anything to elevate its future issues. It’s highly doubtful that India can keep on going with their delusions unless they have a real change in policy, given modi’s lack of one during the farmers crisis I have no real hopes
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
Vietnam might be looking at America as a security hedge against China as China grows more and more powerful in the military aspect.

This is a legitimate fear that ASEAN countries have and as such it wouldnt surprise me that even if the US doesn't offer anything economically, it would still have a lot of influence due to its military.

Dont forget, there is always a balance. The stronger you get, the more your neighbors close ranks and try to hedge against you. Normal geopolitics, nothing unusual here
A hedge only works if the patron power is actually willing to fight for its protectorate.

To align oneself with a patron who won’t fight for you is to become cannon fodder.
 

escobar

Brigadier
The more effective strategy for Vietnam is to improve its relationship with China.

If Vietnam improves its relationship with America, what does it get out of that? Not much.

The power disparity at the moment in the region too great. Everyone sees it.

Almost everyone.

The fact is they sent a high ranking official from America to the region, and not the other way around. It is kind of obvious who is courting who.

The other fact is that only two countries in the region wanted to host this high ranking American official.

That speaks volumes.
Sure that should be the best strategy for Vietnam but for this you need to have leaders with sophisticated thoughts not the ones brainwashed by US PR lol...
 
Top