Miscellaneous News

Nobaron

Junior Member
Registered Member
they're indo-aryans
They actually never were indo aryans.Aryans refer to Iranians. It refers to tall fair blue eyed people, those who invaded India. Now of course they can claim they are "heir" to them. Except those in Kashmir & Punjab, i dont really see any trace of aryan race in India.

How can they punish an irresponsible superpower?

Without changing the US from within (cause you don't have control over it, it's Thier stupidity that'll cause the collapse)
Well you have given the answer.
The concept of west is very broad. It had many forms, from past colonizers to present form of so called democracy. Apparently their super powers have collapsed before.
US however dont think will need punishment. It is fractured socially, nationally throughout. The reason why US still exists is because it exports it's problems outside,a privilege acquired thanks to WW2.
 

Maula Jatt

Junior Member
Registered Member
They actually never were indo aryans.Aryans refer to Iranians. It refers to tall fair blue eyed people, those who invaded India. Now of course they can claim they are "heir" to them. Except those in Kashmir & Punjab, i dont really see any trace of aryan race in India.


Well you have given the answer.
The concept of west is very broad. It had many forms, from past colonizers to present form of so called democracy. Apparently their super powers have collapsed before.
US however dont think will need punishment. It is fractured socially, nationally throughout. The reason why US still exists is because it exports it's problems outside,a privilege acquired thanks to WW2.
- the first one was a joke, they use it to insult Mongoliad races in thier internet sphere

- Agree with you, also imo this world due to messed up borders by colonist, putting rival group in one country to keep it poor,

would see some kind of change somewhere in the future, maybe that can be a catalyst for new global power structure

Provided we survive that...
 

windsclouds2030

Senior Member
Registered Member
The concept of west is very broad. It had many forms, from past colonizers to present form of so called democracy. Apparently their super powers have collapsed before.
US however dont think will need punishment. It is fractured socially, nationally throughout. The reason why US still exists is because it exports it's problems outside,a privilege acquired thanks to WW2.
Among the many forms, I believe the most destructive power to the world (the earlier empires simply didn't have the technologies and transport to facilitate their expansions beyond their immediate borders) comes from the Anglo alliance, first represented by the British Empire, then the baton of the imperialistic power was passed peacefully to its younger Anglo sibling, the American Empire. The power transfer was done peacefully because 1) they belong to the Anglo brotherhood, 2) the violent part, the great one, was already godly set in the World War II.

Some unconventional thought, interesting exposition about such power transfer was told by the Canadian author, Henry Makow, PhD. This
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
gives some insight on the Anglo Brotherhood, thus wider lens about today's world… great for a starter! Then
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
on the rapid rise of Germany after the first WW -- Makow writes a lot. The World History is indeed continuous, it carries on from era to era...
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
I don’t know. Some people are comparing them to pre-49 PLA. What do you think?

PLA won in a huge people's revolution with massive popular support and conventional victories where the KMT armies were smashed. People were waving the 5 star red flag.

Taliban 'won' by bribing ANA to drop their guns, people fear and hate them, and civilians are taking down the Taliban white flag and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

A victory based on treachery and bribery cannot last. Only victory based on true popular support and strength can last.
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
I agree. The same fight hardened low tech insurgency starting with cultivating the rural areas and closing on the cities. Very Maoist in strategy.

Vastly different. Mao won conventionally with vast popular support. Whether Taliban won is yet to be seen, since they bribed commanders to surrender. They only have 75k troops, ANA didn't defect. And they are lacking in true popular support.

Vice President Saleh is making his stand in his hometown with 30k troops and the Afghan Air Force.
 

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Anti-Chinese sentiment has grown so much this year that China has replaced Japan — the former colonial ruler — as the country regarded most unfavorably in South Korea, according to a joint survey by the polling company Hankook Research and the Korean newsmagazine SisaIN. In the same survey, South Koreans said they favored the United States over China six to one.
Over 58 percent of the 1,000 respondents called China “close to evil” while only 4.5 percent said that it was “close to good.”
 
Top