Miscellaneous News

voyager1

Captain
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

This is why I am against this "summit". See what their climate envoy will say:
Kerry is trying to move China to establish a more stringent emissions target for the year 2030,
A State Department spokesperson said Kerry's message for Beijing will be blunt.
We must insist Beijing do more to reduce emissions and help tackle the worldwide climate crisis.
China has committed to peak its emissions before 2030, and reach carbon neutrality by 2060, but these targets would not be ambitious enough to meet the Paris agreement's target of holding the global temperature increase to "well below" 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 Fahrenheit) by 2100, relative to preindustrial levels..
Can you see their delusion?
Can you see supposed superiority to China?
Can you see that they only want to lecture China?
Can you see their hypocrisy in lecturing China while they have passed 0 federal legislation to combat climate change?
 
Last edited:

H2O

Junior Member
Registered Member
@voyager1 wishful thinking, the military establishment will not let that happen, they even ignored Trump withdrawal orders. The Washington swamp need their war, need an additional infusion of money to their pet project.

There are consequences to all that money printing. Ask the Germans.

Wrong, they will withdraw. The withdrawal explicitly is NOT conditions based, this is in fact a surrender from Washington..

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

They're not leaving. First it was May 1st, now Sept 11 (why are they so fascinated with this date?). And when Sept 11 approaches, the Pentagon will find another excuse and push back the "withdrawal" date.
 

H2O

Junior Member
Registered Member
This is why I am against this "summit". See what their climate envoy will say:

Can you their delusion?
Can you seir supposed superiority to China?
Can you see that they only want to lecture China?
Can you see their hypocrisy in lecturing China while they have passed 0 federal legislation to combat climate change?

Attend the summit, give lip service and turn off computer.
 

escobar

Brigadier
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

This is why I am against this "summit". See what their climate envoy will say:




Can you their delusion?
Can you seir supposed superiority to China?
Can you see that they only want to lecture China?
Can you see their hypocrisy in lecturing China while they have passed 0 federal legislation to combat climate change?
True, but CN itself agreed to welcome him. Then why they will not lecture CN?
And Paris agreement looks like a "joke"
 

quantumlight

Junior Member
Registered Member
Yes I dont know why China tolerates Japanese inteference in its internal matters and doesn't fight back strongly now?

I mean they are actively releasing material on the sea near China and China responds by only sending strong words, it actually reminds me of the EU lol

Puzzling behaviour from China, this is an act of eco-terrorism
As plawolf suggested about conducting missile strikes on the Jap storage tanks... I would say "accidentally" have those missiles hit TSMC instead and then say whoops, and make sure the missiles draw a dick pic in the air right before flattening the facilities
 

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
There are consequences to all that money printing. Ask the Germans.



They're not leaving. First it was May 1st, now Sept 11 (why are they so fascinated with this date?). And when Sept 11 approaches, the Pentagon will find another excuse and push back the "withdrawal" date.
@H2O and that date 9/11 had symbolism attached to it and those withdrawal date is being put in to buy peace with the Taliban and it backfire badly, you can't blame the Taliban having been promise to withdraw and then lie about it. And the US may increase its troops presence more as the Taliban attacks had recently intensify as justification and they need to liberate the Afghan women from slavery though ....LOL.
 
Top