Hong-Kong Protests

supersnoop

Major
Registered Member
How else would you like me to refer to people living in Hong Kong?

I've heard mainlanders refer to "Shanghainese", "Beijingers", etc (in English, of course). Are they also being racist?
I never said you were racist, I said it was weird.
If you know so many Chinese people, have you ever heard "Hong Kongese"?
Hong Konger/HKer is the most common
 

Mr T

Senior Member
After seeing what happened with Brexit, let's see what actually happens if the Conservative Party has to vote.

As I said before, the Tories aren't the only party in Parliament. If the government puts forward immigration reform, none of the Opposition parties will vote against it. They'll almost certainly back it. That just leaves the Tories. You would need at least 300+ Tory MPs - nearly 320 - to block the measure. There's never been a rebellion like that in living memory. If you think that's a realistic possibility, you're welcome to say "I told you so" when it happens.

But note the City of London is as influential as ever in Parliament, and is heavily influenced by those companies.

The City of London has no representation in Parliament, unlike HK finance via the functional constituences in LegCo. As for indirect lobbying, I doubt that any business leaders would ask MPs to block the legislation. It's got nothing to do with them - besides, they prefer a bigger labour market, means less upward pressure on wages.

That will temper the situation, so there won't have to be a vote in Parliament about letting in 3million migrants.

I'm not even sure what that means. If Beijing pushes through the security legislation, unless it's really narrowly focused, the UK government has said it will bring in immigration changes. I suppose it might change its mind, but I doubt the City is going to get involved.

I never said you were racist, I said it was weird.

Sure. But "negro" is a racist term, not weird.

If you know so many Chinese people, have you ever heard "Hong Kongese"?

If I can remember correctly, mainlanders said "Hong Kong people" or "Chinese". As for people from HK, they said "I'm from Hong Kong".

Hong Konger/HKer is the most common

You're probably right. I'll try to make a mental note.
 

supersnoop

Major
Registered Member
Sure. But "negro" is a racist term, not weird.

Yes, it is now, but in the 70's it wasn't. It was supposed to be an example of something not common anymore, but used to be. Maybe not the best one to use.
Anyway, that's it on that.
 
It is another smoke a d mirror trick. I've just gone back from the golf club this morning. And my less informed friends were harping on about this as the big thing Britain is doing. It make them all feel good and proud to be British. It's nothing but PR exercise so people like our Mr T here can feel good about themselves. And Boris and Britain still thinks they got a place at the head table in geopolitics.

In fact it is still short of citizenship. Basically, and I can't be more blunt than this. They are still not BRITISH citizens. They don't have the same rights as other British citizens. Vote in elections, stay for more than 12 months. Take unemployment benefits. Use the national health system. Should I go on?

They are basically tourists that's allowed to work with maximum stay of 12 months, after which they would have to go back to where they come from....... which is Hong Kong. All the while, they are, unfortunately still Chinese nationals!

I know he is just dangling carrots as Boris Johnson will unlikely be capable of delivering.

But this is what he wrote.

"Today,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and another 2.5 million would be eligible to apply for them. At present, these passports allow visa-free access to the United Kingdom for up to six months.

If China imposes its national security law ,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and allow any holder of these passports from Hong Kong to come to the UK for a renewable period of 12 months and be given further immigration rights, including the right to work, which could place them on a route to citizenship."


Boris Johnson is saying if China impose the National Security Law which China already did, The British government will change immigration rules where 2.85 million HK people will be allowed visa free access for up to 12 months, which are renewable and they will be given right to work and perhaps citizenship.

Given the National Security Law is a done deal. I'm sure a significant number of people will take this opportunity to immigrate regardless of national security law or not. I do not see much harm with giving HK people this option. Some will go and some will stay. No harm regardless.

The bigger question is will Boris Johnson be able to deliver on this British pledge. I challenge him to deliver on this pledge and if not, Britain would have double-cross the HK people once again and they can blame the British again for that.

If anything, I think it will make HK people be less resistant to the national security law. It will be a double win for HK people with peace and stability with rights to UK immigration as benefit on the side.
 

Mr T

Senior Member
Boris Johnson is saying if China impose the National Security Law which China already did

China hasn't imposed anything. The NPC voted to allow/ask the Standing Committee to draft the law. Until the SC has drafted and enacted the law it doesn't exist.

Theoretically the Standing Committee could shelve it, even if that's improbable.
 

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
The City of London has no representation in Parliament, unlike HK finance via the functional constituences in LegCo. As for indirect lobbying, I doubt that any business leaders would ask MPs to block the legislation. It's got nothing to do with them - besides, they prefer a bigger labour market, means less upward pressure on wages.

For goodness sake, are you that ignorant of how Parliaments actually work?

We see Big Business directly lobbying politicians on China policy in Germany.
What makes you think the UK is so different?

The City of London Corporation has a permanent representative who sits right next to the Speaker in the House of Commons.
His job is to ensure the City's interests are protected, and to directly lobby MPs.

And are you blind as to why the City of London Corporation might care about China policy?

The expectation is that the Chinese economy and currency will surpass the US Dollar in global influence.
Call it 2-3x larger.
What matters more to the long-term future of the City of London than having access to the Chinese RMB?

---
Extend that to other businesses which have ties to China, which is pretty much all of the big ones.

And remember that China is forecast to grow at 1% this year.
In comparison, the average UK forecast is currently negative 7.9%.
And China is roughly 6x larger than the UK in exchange rate terms.

Given that imbalance and the current situation, China is in a position to selectively punish the UK, at little cost to itself.

The Whitehall Bureaucracy and Business will be pointing this out to Boris Johnson and his fellow Cabinet Ministers.
 

Gatekeeper

Brigadier
Registered Member
Lol, it's called being reasonable, not least because Beijing would whine if the legislation was brought forward now. :)

Ok. You say you're from the UK. Guess what, I'm from the UK. So you should have a pretty good grasp of the British attitude towards foreigners. So tell us what do you think would be the mood of the British public if and when 3 million (5% of the UK population) foreigners actually come knocking on the door. After applying for a VISA.
 

solarz

Brigadier
Given the National Security Law is a done deal. I'm sure a significant number of people will take this opportunity to immigrate regardless of national security law or not. I do not see much harm with giving HK people this option. Some will go and some will stay. No harm regardless.

If anything, the world would be a better place if everyone could immigrate to the country that they prefer. Subject to security checks, of course.
 
Top