Chinese Economics Thread

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Economically speaking China will go through a rejuvenation after the coronavirus outbreak is over. The traditional doom and gloom naysayers don't want it to happen because they want China out of the picture. But China is just too big. Every time I read about the economic costs of the coronavirus, it's always in terms of loss to others due to Chinese economic inactivity. Even in anti-China Vietnam their two-faces are exposed in loss of tourism dollars from China. Samsung which outsources end-production of smartphones to Vietnam are getting hit because they can't get the parts they need out of China meaning Vietnam can't make those parts. And don't believe all that nonsense they're going to move production out of China. The naysayers want to believe where corporations outsource, they do it as a humanitarian gesture giving people jobs hence why they always think they can use that leverage. No it's simply the cheapest place for production so these corporations can make every penny they can. If they don't, their stock value drops and these days that's more important to CEOs. Having the cheapest labor doesn't automatically mean cheaper costs. That means if they choose to move out for any reason, it's going to cost them more.
 

Chish

Junior Member
Registered Member
Supply chain and manufacturing move to places where they are most cost efficient and is a long costly and carefully planned process. From building factors to training staff and the required infrastructures and eco systems to run smoothly. And then have to take into account the ever changing geopolitical situation , the social and political stability of the host countries and the unpredictable Trump's handling of countries exporting products to the US. And lastly do they really want to leave the Chinese market if they can sell in China too?
So saying that the coronavirus is moving supply chains out of China is not correct as claimed by one media I read. If indeed some are moving, they would have planned them long ago. That's business, nothing to do with virus.
 

Tam

Brigadier
Registered Member
One of the things that need better notice about Chinese history that economic ideological battles are not recent or modern in Chinese history, but they go all the way back over a millennia.

One of the most pronounced and most profound is the reforms of the Chancellor Wang Anshi vs. the famous scholar and historian, Sima Guang. Sima Guang led the Conservative wing in the Song court. Wang Anshi essentially created and executed Keynesian economics in Song China, with economic reforms that sound surprisingly modern in today's context, while Sima Guang opposed these reforms. Perhaps the first Left and Right wing split of any government in the world?

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Tam

Brigadier
Registered Member
Going to put this link here for future reference. I suggest people should read what Shimamuran economics and the creation of the Investment Credit Creation economy. Both Japan and China are using models of this, as well as Taiwan, Singapore and South Korea. Note that this article is done in 2013.

Western economies and politicians however, don't get it.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

5 The major effects of Shimomuran Economics

Shimomuran economics, considered in the round, has six major effects, First, it drafts the unemployed into the capital goods sector, converting labour (which would otherwise run to waste) into capital goods to enrich the operation of the economy and the wealth of the nation. Second, it provides the funds to continually modernise the plant and in the capital goods and all other sectors of the economy by regularly increasing the level and the quality of the capital investment at the elbow of the already working population. Third, produces the essential upskilling of the employed by funding the necessary training to enable the operation of the continually-updated production machinery. Fourth, it funds and accelerates the rate of invention in the universities and laboratories and the research and development in companies. Fifth, it funds the fresh innovations (which are the The of inventions into the updated equipment on the factory floor and in the offices of the service industries of the economy) which drive economic growth forever upward. Finally, it provides the vast flows of no-cost, long term capital which enables governments to fund major capital-intensive projects to enrich the nation, and to cope with the increasing incidence of national disasters by providing timely and appropriate capital investment to protect the lives and assets of the nation and to replace assets lost through such major events and hence assist a faster recovery from any damage done.

I would say the last sentence is going to apply very well in the coming weeks and months for China.

The next is beautifully said.

Ruskin was absolutely right when he said “There is no wealth but life.” The number and skills of the people in a nation and the level of equipment provided at the workplace to practice these skills determines the final boundary level of national income. The full use of the best skills of all the available people - full employment for all the working population operating at the highest level of skill each can attain, employing the best up-to-date equipment to maximise warranted output - is the route to the maximisation of national wealth.
 

nugroho

Junior Member
Going to put this link here for future reference. I suggest people should read what Shimamuran economics and the creation of the Investment Credit Creation economy. Both Japan and China are using models of this, as well as Taiwan, Singapore and South Korea. Note that this article is done in 2013.

Western economies and politicians however, don't get it.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



I would say the last sentence is going to apply very well in the coming weeks and months for China.

The next is beautifully said.

Why it called Shimamuran, he did not invent it, he just observed it, China had done it for millenium,. China grew its economic by trial error, failure and success, never a man called Shimamuro been an economic adviser, so, why, when China is on right track , there is suddenly someone claiming he understand everything good about China's economic ?
 

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Economically speaking China will go through a rejuvenation after the coronavirus outbreak is over. The traditional doom and gloom naysayers don't want it to happen because they want China out of the picture. But China is just too big. Every time I read about the economic costs of the coronavirus, it's always in terms of loss to others due to Chinese economic inactivity. Even in anti-China Vietnam their two-faces are exposed in loss of tourism dollars from China. Samsung which outsources end-production of smartphones to Vietnam are getting hit because they can't get the parts they need out of China meaning Vietnam can't make those parts. And don't believe all that nonsense they're going to move production out of China. The naysayers want to believe where corporations outsource, they do it as a humanitarian gesture giving people jobs hence why they always think they can use that leverage. No it's simply the cheapest place for production so these corporations can make every penny they can. If they don't, their stock value drops and these days that's more important to CEOs. Having the cheapest labor doesn't automatically mean cheaper costs. That means if they choose to move out for any reason, it's going to cost them more.

It's not just the low costs in China.

It's also how China is the largest market for most categories of goods and services.

And given that it now looks like a self-sustaining global pandemic, who is to say that Vietnam, India, etc won't end up in the same situation.
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
When life gives you lemons...
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
New Chinese billionaires outpace U.S. by three to one - Hurun
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"China minted three times as many new billionaires than the United States in the past year, with fortunes made in drugs and online entertainment after a mini-boom from the coronavirus outbreak, a ranking of the world's wealthiest people shows. "

"The Greater China region, including Hong Kong and Taiwan, created 182 new billionaires in the year to Jan. 31, taking its total to 799, according to the 2020 Hurun Global Rich List released on Wednesday. That compares with 59 new U.S. billionaires. "

""China today has more billionaires than the U.S. and India combined," said Rupert Hoogewerf, founder and chairman of the Hurun Report, which counted 629 U.S. billionaires and 137 in India. "

"Despite the U.S.-China trade war, Ren Zhengfei, founder of Shenzhen-based telecoms giant Huwei Technologies [HWT.UL], blacklisted by the U.S. government, saw his personal wealth grow 7% to $3 billion, roughly on par with that of U.S. President Donald Trump."

"Beijing is the world's billionaire capital for the fifth year, with 110 billionaires, against 98 in New York. Shanghai overtook Hong Kong to claim third spot."
 
Top