China's Westward One Belt One Road Strategy

SamuraiBlue

Captain
Now who is talking here ADB(Asian development bank) is practically Japan's creation to foster good will and amend the WWII aggression with headquarter in Manila
I bet from their window office in Manila they can see how poor the Philippine is. Manila is in dire need of all kind of infrastructure like road and bridges Yet they didn't get it from Japan ADB because Japan is so stingy and their industry exploit Phillipino worker Talking about worker they restrict and limited Phillipino to work in Japan even though Japan is in dire need for care giver of their elderly folk. Plus Japan is wealthy country
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


It fell on China to built bridges in Manila and allowed Phillipino teacher and domestic helper to work in China therefore alleviating poverty and long suffering Phillipino
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


There are ten of thousand of Phillipino domestic helper and now China also allowed Phillipine domestic helper to work in China with set minimum wages of $2700/month
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
So?

First off. Above content has nothing to do with One Road whatever.
Second Singapore and PRC are completely different countries so basically you are trying to take credit from another country's cause.
Third and most important, Japan is the biggest contributor to the Philippines in terms of ODA government loan.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

PRC doesn't even come into the top five.

You are boasting of helping out for only two bridges?LOL
Here is how much Japan had assisted in the Philippines
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Japan's interest rates to these ODA loans are 0.1% for civil work and 0.01% consulting service. How much was PRC demanded towards Sri Lanka 4%?
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
So?

First off. Above content has nothing to do with One Road whatever.
Second Singapore and PRC are completely different countries so basically you are trying to take credit from another country's cause.
Third and most important, Japan is the biggest contributor to the Philippines in terms of ODA government loan.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

PRC doesn't even come into the top five.

You are boasting of helping out for only two bridges?LOL
Here is how much Japan had assisted in the Philippines
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Japan's interest rates to these ODA loans are 0.1% for civil work and 0.01% consulting service. How much was PRC demanded towards Sri Lanka 4%?
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Really Japan loan Phillipine 4.48 billion USD or cumulative 10 billion USD since when? Let see ADB was formed in 1966 so now it is almost 50 years
The Japanese government is the Philippines’ top source of official development assistance (ODA) at the end of the first half, the latest data from the state planning agency National Economic and Development Authority showed.

In a statement Thursday, Neda said outstanding ODA loans from Japan amounted $4.84 billion as of end-June, accounting for 44.83 percent of the total outstanding amount.

ODA loans from the Japanese government were being administered by the Japan International Cooperation Agency (Jica).


Besides Japan, the other top ODA sources were multilateral lenders such as the World Bank with $2.948 billion (27.31 percent of the end-June total) and the Manila-based Asian Development Bank with $2.174 billion (20.14-percent share).

The outstanding ODA loan portfolio as of June totaled $10.797 billion, with $8.197 billion across 54 project loans as well as $2.6 billion in seven program loans.

The disbursement level declined to $802.95 million during the first six months from $861.04 million from January to June last year.


Considering what kind of havoc and destruction that Japan brought upon Philippine that is the least that Japan can do . Relation between China and Philippine is not at best until recently heck Philippine even considered China as enemy and why should China be nice to Philippine. Not too mention that China itself is poor until recently
But they buried the hatchet and Now that China is moderately wealthy(still poor compare to Japan)

China is willing to lend a hand on Philippine those 2 bridges is a start more is coming planned is afoot to build railway, airport reconstruction of Marawi city devastated by war, irrigation you named it totaling 10 billion USD
That is just government to government loan untold is the private investment, tourist,foreign worker remittance, etc. Large swath of Philippine economy is controlled by the Pinoy(descendant of Chinese immigrant) There is bamboo network across asia(mostly Chinese) I bet there will be thousand of joint venture between Pinoy and newly rich Chinese businessman like Jack Ma etc

The DOF had said that a total of $7.34 billion in loans and grants had already been committed by China to finance not only the Duterte administration’s ambitious infrastructure program but also the reconstruction and rehabilitation of war-torn Marawi City.

Meantime, CLSA, the offshore platform of Chinese investment bank CITIC Securities, is working on the finance for a new $10-billion airport in Manila as part of its push into Southeast Asia and China’s ambitious Belt and Road initiative.


The airport project, to be developed south of the Philippine capital, is still awaiting government approval but CLSA has held preliminary talks with potential Chinese backers for the deal, CLSA chair Tang Zhenyi told Reuters.

“It looks like we are in good shape to do this. It’s a $10-billion minimum project,” he said. “Citic and CLSA are in the perfect position to talk with all the Chinese financial institutions.”


Read more:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Follow us:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
|
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Singapore is still Chinese dominated society even it is separate country but it show that as people we have compassion and do want to help fellow Asian while helping ourselves
 

tidalwave

Senior Member
Registered Member
China needs multinational approach in belt n road project prevent US sabotages.

Thailand yingluck outsted because US sabotage of the canal project that enable China bypass Malacca strait choke point.

Recent Malaysia cancelling of China infrastructure projects due to US behind the back.

China should try multinational approach, includes Russia, Pakistan, Cambodia into such project.

If a project cancelled, heavy fines would be levied. If countries refuse to pay, I am sure Russia will tolerate anyone own it money, Russia will militarily attack any country own it money.

China basically needs body guards that's willing to attack. China worry too much about its reputation to attack
 
not sure if it's the right thread, anyway thought I might share the DefenseNews story I've now read, which is
How a potential Chinese-built airport in Greenland could be risky for a vital US Air Force base
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

With less than 60,000 people spread across more than 830,000 square miles, Greenland relies heavily on air transport to move supplies and people up and down its coast.

So when the local government issued a solicitation to build three new airports, the move made sense from a business perspective. The project would be expensive, but would improve commerce and make life on the island easier for its residents.

Then a Chinese company — owned by the government in Beijing, and once
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
— put forth a bid, and a simple request for proposals transformed into a project with international diplomatic ramifications.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, which has final say on national security issues involving Greenland, objected. The government in Greenland then insisted China Communications Construction Company (CCCC), which has succesfully worked on large infrastructure projects around the world, would remain one of its finalists for the projects, setting up intense negotiations between two governments.

All this comes as officials across Europe are raising alarm over whether Chinese economic influence on the continent is becoming a national security problem — with Danish officials specifically worried that the partly-government owned company’s interest in Greenland could have a lasting impact on a key American military base located there.

The Chinese “are players in the world economy, as are others, and should be treated equally. But we are on our guard,” Danish Defence Minister Claus Hjort Fredericksen said in a June 4 interview in his Copenhagen office.

“Of course, we welcome cooperation with China in the commercial field. As long as it has commercial purpose, we are not opposed to that. That is a normal way to expand world trade,” Fredericksen added. He spoke with reporters during a visit to Denmark arranged by the Atlantic Council. Defense News accepted travel and accommodations for the trip.

“But we are very careful looking at the issues if these installations may have other purposes, and that is what is causing trouble.”

Economic influence

To better understand the Greenland situation, consider a broad view of
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in Europe.

During the height of the economic crisis in Europe, Chinese firms swooped in and picked up businesses and infrastructure at below-market prices. Since gaining that foothold,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in everything from mines to scientific expeditions in the high north, said Magnus Nordenman, a regional analyst with the Atlantic Council, and the country has used its economic leverage to drive public policies.

China “scooped up a bunch of stuff for cheap, and later, when there was time for votes in the U.N. about human rights, all of a sudden these countries started backing off,” Nordenman notes.

Transport hubs, such as the Greek port of Piraeus and the Belgian port of Zeebrugge, appear to be a preferred target for Chinese acquisition. Chinese firms now control roughly 10 percent of cargo port space in Europe, according to data from the International Transport Forum.

That makes sense, Nordenman said, when considering the melting ice to the north is opening new transportation routes that China hopes to exploit.


“It is intimately connected to what the [North] Sea can mean for them,” Nordenman said, adding that being able to move material from Europe through northern bodies of water would mean China can no longer be choked off in the South China Sea or Indian Ocean.

In recent years, Chinese firms have invested in several Greenland-based projects, including a mine for rare earth elements and uranium in southern Greenland and an iron mine near the capital, Nuuk. That kind of economic investment has been welcomed as a boost to the local economy.

But in 2016, a Chinese company attempted to buy a former U.S. military base, and the government in Denmark stepped in, vetoing the deal. At the time, Danish officials were quoted anonymously in the press, saying they had resisted the deal as a favor to its longtime American ally.

The CCCC bid for the airport contract would represent another major investment. The airport has an estimated cost of 3.6 billion Danish krone (U.S. $560 million). Such a massive infrastructure project for whatever company wins could potentially set Beijing up as a major economic driver for Greenland.

Like elsewhere in Europe, “the big fear is that even a small Chinese investment will amount to a large part of Greenland’s GDP, giving China an outsized influence that can be used for other purposes,” said Jon Rahbek-Clemmensen, an associate professor at the Royal Danish Defence College’s Institute for Strategy.

Pentagon impact

With a broader reach, experts fear China could gain enough influence to push a key U.S. military base off the island.

The U.S. Air Force’s Thule Air Base, located on the western side of Greenland, is home to several strategic assets vital to America’s homeland defense. The Air Force’s 21st Space Wing operates systems related to missile warning, space surveillance and space control from the base; forces also operate the Upgraded Early Warning Radar, used to track incoming ballistic missiles.

In addition, the base is home to a 10,000-foot runway and what the Pentagon claims is “the northernmost deep water port in the world,” which would become incredibly important for any military operation that runs through the Arctic.

“A Chinese presence in Greenland would complicate the U.S. position on the island — ultimately it is not impossible to imagine that China could pressure the Greenlandic government to ask the Americans to leave or demand permission to get a Chinese military or dual-use presence there,” Rahbek-Clemmensen noted.

"We continue to notice significant interest in Greenland by the Chinese,” a U.S. defense official told Defense News when asked about the issue this summer.


“China has made no secret of their efforts to have a presence in the Arctic region, specifically Greenland. The Chinese government is attempting to leverage overseas investments to ensure China’s economic growth and geopolitical influence, but lack legitimate concern for the long-term prosperity of Greenland and her people," the official said.

While Copenhagen has avoided saying much publicly on the issue, Danish officials behind the scenes were asking Greenland not to consider the bid. However, in late May, the government in Nuuk went ahead and announced CCCC as one of five finalists for the contract, setting up a potential conflict between two governments that frequently struggle with their quasi-independent relationship.

Under a self-rule act passed in 2009, Greenland has control over its domestic infrastructure or economic policy issues, but Denmark maintains veto power on security issues. But where does an investment from China stop being a domestic issue and become one of security?

That line is blurry, and Danish officials are tentative to push too heavily so as not to disturb good relations with Nuuk. Pushing too hard could set off a minor constitutional crisis between the two governments over that gray zone between economic and security issues — one that Danish officials would very much like to avoid.

To that end, Danish Prime Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen met in early June with Greenlandic Prime Minister Kim Kielsen to hash out potential solutions — which could reportedly include Denmark helping fund the project in exchange for Nuuk selecting a different company.

No final decisions have been made on the airport deal, but a deadline is approaching.

“The Parliament of Greenland has been presented with a bill that it will consider during its Fall Session on the framework conditions for the construction, operation and financing of the airports in Nuuk, Ilulissat and Qaqortoq,” said Greenland’s head of representation in the U.S., Inuuteq Holm Olsen. “The Second and Third reading of the bill is scheduled to take place on October 15 and October 22, 2018.”

Holm Olsen noted that in addition to CCCC, two Danish companies, a Canadian firm and a Dutch firm are all finalists. He added that a Danish bank, Den Danske Bank, is serving as a “financial adviser” on the project. Attempts to contact CCCC for comment were unsuccessful by press time.

...
... goes on below due to size limit
 
the rest of the article posted right above:
American tensions

Individuals speaking to Defense News under Chatham House rules during a June trip to Copenhagen are worried that Chinese disinformation campaigns could be launched inside of Greenland to stir up anti-Danish sentiment as part of a push to force Copenhagen’s hand on the issue.

But even without Chinese influence, sentiment among the Danish and Greenlandic public may swing against the U.S. due to ongoing tension between Europe and American President Donald Trump, who has
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
for what he has deemed “unfair” trade practices.

Asked about that potential conflict, Fredericksen, the Danish defense minister, said it is important for residents to split the security concerns from the economic ones.

“There is a much more profound interest in having a strong cooperation and a trustful cooperation with the U.S. than other issues,” he said. “I’m not trying to minimize the trade, the implications we have, but we have to be very firm of the shared responsibility; we have to help each other in the NATO alliance and especially with the U.S.”

Said the U.S. defense official: “The U.S. continues to have a strong relationship with our allies Denmark and Greenland and are grateful to them for hosting U.S. forces at Thule Air Base."

That’s where a web of relationships become evermore tangled. If Copenhagen’s main reason for denying Chinese investment is loyalty to its longtime alliance partner, and that partner is engaged in a trade war with fierce rhetoric toward Europe, the situation could become “increasingly complicated,” Nordenman warned.

“Danish public opinion can certainly swing to: ‘Why do we keep backing up the United States, or paying a price to help the United States when the U.S. is imposing tariffs?’ I think that’s a legitimate worry, and in a democracy, ultimately decision-makers have to answer to people,” he said.

The factor Denmark — and all of Europe — may need consider is what China is truly buying, both in the short term and long term, with its investments.

“China may be driven by benign reasons right now, but its actions still have geopolitical consequences that Washington, Copenhagen and Nuuk should be aware of," Rahbek-Clemmensen said.

“We don’t know if China will be more willing to throw its weight around in the future, but if it does become more assertive, the U.S., Denmark and Greenland will be better off if there isn’t a large Chinese presence in Greenland.”
it's
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
now I read about
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

etc.:
China to take over ZESCO – Africa Confidential
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The respected Africa Confidential has revealed that talks are underway for a Chinese company to takeover power utility ZESCO.

And Africa Confidential has warned that Zambia risks losing its sovereignty to China as that country will seize national assets once government defaults on loans.

In a report titled ‘Bonds, bills and ever bigger debts’ published on September 3, Africa Confidential observed that ZNBC was already being run by the Chinese and disclosed that Zesco was also already in talks about a takeover by a Chinese company.

“A major worry of the IMF and US is that China’s BRI strategy is first to encourage indebtedness, and then to take over strategic national assets when debtors default on repayments. The state electricity company Zesco is already in talks about a takeover by a Chinese company, AC has learned. The state-owned TV and radio news channel ZNBC is already Chinese-owned. The long-term outcome could be effective Chinese ownership of the commanding heights of the economy and potentially the biggest loss of national sovereignty since independence,” the report read.

Africa Confidential noted that Zambians would be alarmed to learn the real Chinese debt figures.

“Zambia is a good example of what the International Monetary Fund and the United States Senate are calling a crisis of accelerating developing-country indebtedness to China.

On 3 August, a bipartisan letter by prominent US Senators to US Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin urged the US not to allow the IMF to bail out countries which had got themselves into financial difficulties thanks to over-exposure to Chinese debt, especially for ‘overpriced’ infrastructure projects.

The démarche builds on the concern expressed by IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde in a major speech in April and pundits in Lusaka say the description fits Zambia like a glove,” the report read.

“The Senators’ letter names ‘predatory Chinese infrastructure financing’ as part of ‘debt-trap diplomacy’ which is integral to the Belt Road Initiative (BRI).

The letter continues that Twenty three of the 68 developing countries are in debt distress or strong risk thereof because of the BRI.

Although Zambia is classified as at high risk of debt distress it is not among the 23 named, but Africa Confidential’s sources say this is only because much of its debt to China has not been fully accounted for, an exercise the Lusaka exchequer is not anxious to complete for fear of the alarm the figures would cause.”

Africa Confidential noted that although Finance Minister Margaret Mwanakatwe announced that all Chinese projects below 80 per cent completion would be halted, President Edgar Lungu told Chinese nationals that all projects would go ahead as planned.

“The Zambian government is supposed to be contributing 15% of its own money to the Chinese-financed projects. Meeting this commitment is testing government finances to the limit and taking precedence over social expenditure. Even though Finance Minister Margaret Mwanakatwe pledged to halt all Chinese-backed projects that were less than 80% complete, on 11 July President Lungu publicly told Chinese officials in Lusaka that there would be ‘no disruption in the ongoing projects’ financed by China,” read the report.

“Since President Edgar Lungu came to power, Zambia has signed off on at least US$8 billion in Chinese project finance. Over $5 bn. of this has not been added to the total because Zambia insists the money has not been disbursed, and more large loans are in the pipeline. Yet the finance ministry does not have the capacity, insiders say, to police, let alone stem, all the spending. In some cases, the financial penalties for halting disbursement on projects would outweigh the savings. Donor governments have offered technical assistance to bring the project debt mountain under control but have been rebuffed.”

Africa Confidential also reported that IMF representative Alfredo Baldini was asked to leave on accusations that he was “spreading negative talk.

“The government has all but expelled an IMF official, as the debt continues to spiral and the role of Chinese projects in it raises more concern. Having allocated US$500 million to external debt service this year, the government’s liquidity crisis drags on as relations with donors and international financial institutions plummet. Lusaka asked the International Monetary Fund to withdraw its resident representative Alfredo Baldini on the grounds that he was supposedly ‘spreading negative talk’ among the donors, a source in Lusaka said. The rift is a blow to any chance – practically non-existent though it already was – of a deal,” read the report.

And Africa Confidential revealed that Britain’s Department for International Development was investigating three ministries for fraud.
“Financial management across the ministries is under scrutiny. Britain’s Department for International Development is investigating fraud in three ministries, which could have serious implications for future funding, Africa Confidential has learned. And Zambian exposure to Chinese debt, especially project credit, is still causing concern,” read the report.

Meanwhile, Africa Confidential noted that government had continued spending lavishly despite the country being in debt distress.
“In mid-July Lusaka announced a supplementary budget of 7.2 billion kwacha ($721 mn.). Half of this is for debt service, which leaves only just enough only for public sector salaries, which it is struggling to pay. It missed most August salary payments, causing outcry among civil servants last week. Efforts to raise capital domestically are not going well. The auctions of Treasury Bills have been poorly subscribed on average although it has been using massive inducements to attract the banks. Government data shows that by the end of May it had spent $489 mn. on external debt service and on 19 July it announced a further $161.3 mn. was paid in June. It will need a further $360 mn. over and above the sum originally budgeted to cover debt service,” read the report.

Ministry of Finance insiders say that domestic measures now in train to re-allocate spending are not realistic and that at least another $300 mn. needs to come from fresh borrowing. Yet the government is spending as freely as ever, as in the lavish expenditure by the Patriotic Front on the election of Miles Sampa as mayor of Lusaka on 26 July, even though only 15% of voters turned out.”
 

JsCh

Junior Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Zambia refutes report of Chinese firms taking over public assets due to debt
Source: Xinhua| 2018-09-09 19:09:18|Editor: xuxin
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



LUSAKA, Sept. 9 (Xinhua) -- The Zambian Government on Saturday refuted a media report that it was in talks with Chinese companies for the latter to take over public institutions due to debt.

Chief government spokesperson Dora Siliya tweeted a denial of the report that said the government was seeking to sell some public assets, pointing out that some of the China-funded projects had not even been completed.

"Govt's position is that all stories relating to sale or takeover of public assets such (as) ZNBC (state broadcaster), Kenneth Kaunda International Airport, and ZESCO (power utility) by China are false," she said on Twitter.

"ZNBC digital migration and KK AIRPORT projects not even complete yet. How then can one refer to loan default in view of grace periods?" she asked.

Last week, the African Confidential fortnightly reported that talks were underway for a Chinese firm to take over Zambia's power utility due to debt.
 

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
Brookings / World Bank Paper.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


In summary, the studies show that Chinese development projects are a huge positive for the recipient countries.

The key findings are below.


Will Chinese development projects pave the way to inclusive growth?

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


China’s critics claim that it bankrolls “white elephant” projects that are politically motivated and economically unsustainable.
...
In a new study, my co-authors and I put these competing arguments to the test by conducting an evaluation of the national economic growth impacts of approximately 4,300 Chinese government-financed development projects in 138 countries.
...
For the average host country, a doubling of Chinese official development assistance (ODA) produces 0.4 percentage point increase in economic growth two years after the funding is approved.
...
In a companion study, my co-authors and I use an alternative measure of economic output—remotely sensed nighttime light output—and the geo-coordinates of 3,097 Chinese-funded development project locations to determine whether these economic effects are also detectable at subnational scales. Here again, we find that Chinese development projects deliver major economic development gains: On average, we estimate that a 10 percent increase in Chinese development finance corresponds to an 0.6-1.1 percent increase in nighttime light output, which is roughly equivalent to a 0.2-0.3 percent increase in subnational GDP.
...
Several new studies (accessible here, here, here, and here) demonstrate that traditional aid agencies and development banks do a poor job of targeting economically disadvantaged regions within the countries where they work. In fact, the empirical record indicates that Western aid agencies and multilateral development banks prefer to locate their investments in wealthier areas within host countries.
...
Whereas Western donors prefer to invest in overland (interior-to-interior) transportation networks, China prefers to invest in interior-to-coast transportation networks.
...
Several studies suggest that the development of interior-to-coast transportation networks helped China reverse a trend of growing inequality within and across the country’s subnational localities.
...
In a new study entitled “Connective Financing,” my co-authors and I put this argument to test. In order to measure the distributional effects of Chinese development projects, we first identify the precise locations of 3,485 Chinese government-financed development projects (see map below) that were implemented in 138 countries between 2000 and 2014. We then use satellite data on the geographical distribution of nighttime light to develop a measure of economic inequality that can be tracked from year to year in more than 32,000 subnational localities around the world. To estimate the distributional impacts of these Chinese development projects, we use a method of statistical analysis that accounts for many other factors that could have affected levels of economic inequality between 2000 and 2014.
...
these findings suggest that Chinese investments in connective infrastructure are promoting spatially inclusive growth.
...
So, it’s time to dispense with the notion that China must be either a villain or a hero. It is neither. Its motivations and impacts are complex, and we will do a great disservice to those who make important decisions about cooperation and competition with China if we allow the policy debate to be hijacked by those who can offer conjecture and cherry-picked cases but not evidence that meets high standards of social scientific rigor.

Source
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

tidalwave

Senior Member
Registered Member
It's important for Syria to be stabilized. Therefore, China should send forces to join hand with Russia, Iran and Syrian government to drive out ISIS.
 
Top