F-35 Joint Strike Fighter News, Videos and pics Thread

Skywatcher

Captain
That F-35 delivery upon DoD delivering those reports to Congress is a waste of time... a Intern could do those reports from Wikipedia (though they won't go that route for obvious reasons, if you have interns doing that scut work, then OSD is going to get a headcount cut).
 
here comes the USNI News
Lockheed Martin: F-35 Production on Track Even as Congress Mulls Barring Turkey’s Participation
The stealthy F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter won’t be overly exposed to cost pressures if international customer Turkey is barred by Congress from taking ownership of its aircraft, Lockheed Martin’s senior leadership said while discussing second quarter financial results with Wall Street analysts during a Tuesday conference call.

For the three months ending June 24, Lockheed Martin reported sales of $13.4 billion, compared with sales of $12.5 billion a year ago. Profits for the quarter also increased, to $1.8 billion, compared to a profit of $1.7 billion a year ago. Aircraft sales, including the F-35, account for 40 percent of the company’s projected 2018 revenues of more than $50.3 billion.

In Fiscal Year 2019, Lockheed Martin is on track to deliver 91 F-35 aircraft, said Marillyn Hewson, chief executive, during the analyst conference call. The bulk of these aircraft are destined for U.S. military use.

Acknowledging media reports that a deal to produce the next batch of F-35 aircraft is nearly complete, Bruce Tanner, Lockheed’s chief financial officer, told analysts once finalized the agreement between Lockheed Martin and the F-35 Joint Program Office would help set the stage to set up a big block buy.

But analysts wanted Lockheed Martin officials to explain how potential Congressional action blocking Turkey from taking ownership of their F-35 aircraft could hurt the overall financial performance of the company’s largest program.

Congressional leaders, Pentagon officials and Lockheed Martin executives have all spoken frequently about the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
per fighter if the program is going to be sustainable, but any cost savings plans discussed include Turkey’s planned purchase 100 F-35 aircraft. Turkey has been a member of the F-35 program since its 1999 inception.

However, Congress is threatening to block NATO-member Turkey from taking ownership of its aircraft because of concerns the nation is considering purchasing the Russian-made S-400 air and missile defense system.

The FY 2019 National Defense Authorization Act, which emerged from a conference committee Monday evening, specifically asks for Secretary of Defense James Mattis to provide Congress with an update on Turkey’s military relationship with the U.S. military. Turkey’s proposed purchase of the S-400 system concerns Congressional leaders, according to the NDAA language, because its deployment poses “operational and counterintelligence risks” to the U.S. operation of F-35 aircraft.

Coincidentally, last month Lockheed Martin held a roll-out ceremony for Turkey’s first two F-35 aircraft. Turkey’s F-35 acquisition is part the U.S. Department of State-administered Foreign Military Sales program, which allows foreign governments to purchase military equipment from the U.S. government. Purchases made through this program require Congressional approval.

“This is under the FMS, the foreign military sales arrangement,” Tanner said. “This is a contract between Lockheed and the US Government, as opposed to direct commercial sales, so we’ll continue to deliver aircraft until the U.S. government says don’t deliver those aircraft, which we’re not expecting.”

For now, Tanner said Lockheed Martin is delivering Turkish aircraft on schedule. For the time being, as is with the case with any international sale, Tanner said the Turkish aircraft remain in the U.S. as Turkey’s pilots train with their aircraft.

“We have some time before those aircraft would leave the U.S.,” Tanner said.

Meanwhile, Hewson said the company is evaluating how potential Congressional restrictions placed on Turkey’s F-35 program participation could affect aircraft production. According to Lockheed Martin, 10 Turkish companies have supported F-35 development and their participation could ultimately be worth more than $12 billion.

“We’ll comply with the guidance we get going forward,” Hewson said. “The program itself, it has some range of time before we’d have some action.”
...
... the rest is related to the LRASM program; source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Skywatcher

Captain
Skywatcher
your babbling is related to what, exactly?
The NDAA draft as of now, is barring further deliveries of F-35s to Turkey...

Until the DoD delivers a couple reports about Turkey and the S-400, bilateral American-Turkish relations and F-35 supply chain disruption to Congress within 90 days of the 2019 NDAA being enacted (which is ridiculously easy for OSD to do, anyone want to take a bet as to how many Congress people will actually read the darn things?_

So its just a silly formality for the Congress critters to say "we did something" (though not of actual import).
 
May 1, 2018
got the feeling the narrative changes from 'capabilities' to 'sustainment' (it'd be funny if I was right, because F-35 capabilities are unproven, not independently tested), anyway Air Force acquisition exec: To reduce F-35 sustainment cost, focus on agile software
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
related:
Will The F-35 Program Meet Its Cost Target?

Jul 24, 2018
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The recent agreement between the Pentagon and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
for the latest lot of
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
includes a 6% price reduction compared to the previous buy. And while the two parties contend that the agreement indicates the price of a single F-35A will drop to $80 million by 2020, past cost estimates by the aircraft’s manufacturer and program office have proved overly optimistic.

Following the announcement of the handshake agreement for the 11th lot of F-35s for 141 jets, Pentagon acquisition executive Ellen Lord told Aviation Week in a statement, “With each production lot, the F-35 Unit Recurring Flyaway costs continue to come down across the board.”

Congressional sources point out that the 6% cost reduction for Lot 11 is considered average, given the number of aircraft.

Lot 11 is the final production buy before the Joint Program Office (JPO) and Lockheed Martin enter a block-buy contract for F-35 international partners and Foreign Military Sales (FMS) customers for production Lots 12, 13 and 14. U.S. participation is constrained to economic order quantity (EOQ) procurement in fiscal 2019 for Lot 13 and fiscal 2020 for Lot 14 production contracts because Capitol Hill would not sign off. Congress is waiting for the aircraft to complete operational testing before authorizing the Pentagon to enter the block buy.

The JPO estimates the total U.S. and international savings from the F-35 EOQ is $1.2 billion compared to a traditional contracting construct. However, the Pentagon’s Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation (CAPE) office, in a report viewed by Aviation Week, notes the savings will be roughly $595 million, or about half of the figure projected by the JPO.

The disparity between the two Pentagon offices is sounding alarm bells in Congress. “While these savings are still significant, as certified by the Undersecretary of Defense (Acquisition and Sustainment), the Committee is dismayed by the inaccuracy of the initial JPO estimates,” reads the Senate Appropriations Committee’s mark up of the fiscal 2019 spending bill.

CAPE’s analysis is based on site visits and discussions with the prime contractor and key subvendors that occurred between December 2017 and February 2018.

“The CAPE forecast is equivalent to a $1.3 million reduction per aircraft (or 1.5%) over the planned procurement of 442 aircraft, with a total contract value of approximately $40 billion in fiscal 2018-20,” the report reads.

The assessment concludes that anticipated U.S. savings would be about $300 million compared to the JPO’s estimate of $638 million. Lockheed Martin aims to lower the F-35A price to $80 million per airframe by 2020, while CAPE’s analysis of the cost reduction is that the $80 million goal does not seem feasible within that time frame. The previous head of the F-35 program for the company, Jeff Babione, says either a block buy or multiyear contract is paramount to achieve the $80 million target.

During the Farnborough Airshow, the new head of the F-35 program for Lockheed Martin, Greg Ulmer, said the company is in discussions with the JPO about the necessity for a third phase of the affordability initiative focused on Joint Strike Fighter procurement and sustainment.

The effort, known as Blueprint for Affordability (BFA), debuted in 2014. Lockheed Martin and F-35 subcontractors
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
invested $164 million in internal funding for the first phase of the initiative to improve the fighter’s manufacturing process, tooling and assembly. The inaugural phase of the BFA is complete and yielded about $4 billion in cost-savings over the life of the program, Ulmer says.

“We have many hundreds of projects associated with [BFA 2 to date], and we’re already forecasting greater than $2 billion of additional savings for the program,” he says.

The company will continue to analyze potential cost-reduction initiatives but is uncertain if there will be a third phase of BFA.

“As we’ve been producing the airplanes from [low-rate initial-production] LRIP 1 to LRIP 10 today, it’s actually about a 60% reduction. You’re going to see this trend continue when you see the final numbers on the LRIP 11 final contract,” Ulmer says.

The program is in discussion with Belgium, Finland and Germany to purchase F-35s, and Lockheed Martin just received a request for proposals from Switzerland to participate in its fighter competition.

There is speculation that both the UK and Italy may reduce their F-35 purchases, and Congress may block Turkey from purchasing the fighters. Those moves would increase the per-unit price for the U.S., international partners and FMS customers.

Now that the UK’s F-35s are based in-country, though, Ulmer is hopeful there will be advocacy there for the aircraft going forward.
 
All right, to simplify it for you, the whole provision is just political theater and posturing.
what the ...
Skywatcher
I'm not sure if you ever posted a link or a picture, or if all you offer is ... just looking at this page:

chicken droppings Wednesday at 2:28 AM
That F-35 delivery upon DoD delivering those reports to Congress is a waste of time... a Intern could do those reports from Wikipedia (though they won't go that route for obvious reasons, if you have interns doing that scut work, then OSD is going to get a headcount cut).
horse droppings Thursday at 1:10 AM
The NDAA draft as of now, is barring further deliveries of F-35s to Turkey...

Until the DoD delivers a couple reports about Turkey and the S-400, bilateral American-Turkish relations and F-35 supply chain disruption to Congress within 90 days of the 2019 NDAA being enacted (which is ridiculously easy for OSD to do, anyone want to take a bet as to how many Congress people will actually read the darn things?_

So its just a silly formality for the Congress critters to say "we did something" (though not of actual import).
apparently directed against the US Congress?!
 
here's the part of

Lord Touts Streamlining; Previews Industrial Plan, Software Blacklist, F-35 Trades
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


related to F-35:

"Pentagon acquisition, technology, and logistics czar Ellen Lord ... said the services are "working through the trades right now" on what to do about retrofitting older jets to the current 3F standard. Readiness rates of the jet in USAF and Marine Corps service have suffered because vendors are making similar but not interchangeable parts for multiple configurations of the aircraft; necking down to fewer configurations would increase parts supply for both production and sustainment. Lord said it will be decided by the end of the calendar year whether the Air Force will upgrade its training jets to combat configuration, and whether the Marine Corps will actually retire some more of its earliest F-35s. She is focused on getting as many aircraft as possible to the TR, or Technical Refresh, Level 2 and 3.

Sooner, though, she will preside over a Defense Acquisition Board confirming what will be included in the "Block IV" upgrade plan that will incorporate new technologies in the F-35 over the next decade.

At her level, "Block IV ... is what we're focused on. We're working very closely with the services, they know exactly what the elements of Block IV are," Lord said, "both in terms of software and hardware. We meet on it regularly so there is no ambiguity there. We are doing...basic systems engineering work to decompose what the end state needs to be in terms of capability, down into projects, associating time and cost with them."

While she confirmed there is now a "handshake deal" between the government and Lockheed Martin on the Lot 11 buy of F-35s, she refused to give any details or say how much the unit price will decline with the next batch of the fighters.

Lord also noted that a study which recommended that the F-35 Joint Program Office give way to separate service program offices is an eventual but not near-term plan. A key finding of the study, though, was that "We probably needed the integration offices to have a little bit more focus. And there was a commitment by the services to put a more senior individual" in place "as the interface to the JPO." Lord said for the time being, international partners still need a centralized entity to work with, and she noted that there are 130 foreign partners working in the JPO in key managerial positions on the multinational project."
 
don't know how credible the source is, but it'd be a very interesting development if true (and LOL no, I didn't confuse threads), so here comes the article
Israel poised to ink $11 billion aircraft deal with Boeing
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Like previous procurement deals, Israel will pay with American defense aid for F-15 fighter jets, transport helicopters and aerial refueling tankers • Deal pending defense establishment recommendation, cabinet approval • Last Boeing deal was 20 years ago.

Israel is considering the purchase of new F-15 fighter jets for its air force as part of the largest defense deal in Israel's history.

The deal with aircraft manufacturer Boeing, worth a combined $11 billion, is likely to include three main components: A fleet of fighter jets, a fleet of transport helicopters and aerial refueling tankers.

The two latter components are especially critical because the Israeli Air Force's existing transport helicopters and refueling planes are extremely outdated and require immediate replacement.

Similar to previous aircraft procurement deals in recent decades, Israel will use American defense aid to pay for the fleets. The deal is expected to be spread out over the course of approximately 10 years, starting from the moment the deal is signed and until the last of the aircraft is delivered to Israel.

The Defense Ministry and the IDF have been working to complete this deal for quite some time. The main point of debate surrounded the question of whether to purchase each component from a different manufacturer or all three from the same company – which ultimately came with better payment, supply and maintenance conditions.

Regarding two of the components, Boeing had the clear advantage from the outset. Its refueling tanker, developed from the Boeing 767 passenger plane, has well-established capabilities and could be delivered in a relatively short time.

Boeing's helicopter menu was also advantageous. Israeli officials, however, didn't want to buy just one type of helicopter, rather an entire transport squadron with a mix of CH-47 Chinooks and V-22 Ospreys. It has yet to be determined how many of each will be purchased, but the decision will depend on the air force's recommendations. The air force is expected to gradually phase out its existing fleet of CH-53 Sikorsky transport helicopters.

The primary dilemma surrounding the deal involved the fighter jets. Israel's most recent deal with Boeing was 20 years ago, when it purchased a squadron of F-15i Thunder jets. Subsequent deals were made with Boeing's competitor, Lockheed Martin, first for the purchase of over 100 F-16i Storm jets and in recent years 50 F-35 Mighty jets – Israel's first plane with stealth capabilities.

Not just the F-35

Until recently, IDF officials believed the F-35 would be the last manned fighter plane Israel would buy, both to preserve the air force's qualitative edge over other countries in the region and to minimize the types of planes it would have to operate – thereby cutting down on operational expenditures. However, there has been a policy shift and now the plan is to buy another squadron of advanced F-15s, as part of the overall deal with Boeing.

The jet, developed from the original F-15, will be completely new and be known as the IA F-15 (an acronym for Israel Advanced).

Boeing committed to installing improved features, including certain stealth capabilities. With that, for the purpose of maintaining relations with Lockheed Martin and the F-35 project, it's possible that a limited number of additional F-35 will also be bought and delivered over the course of several years.

Officially, the deal is currently waiting on theIAF's professional recommendation, which will be presented to the chief of staff, the director general of the defense ministry and finally to the defense minister, who will jointly formulate the defense establishment's position on the matter. The deal will then be brought before the cabinet for final approval.

Senior defense officials, meanwhile, have intimated that the Boeing deal enjoys consensus support inside the Defense Ministry and IDF, and that the cabinet is likely to approve it.

The decision is expected to be made by the end of 2018. With that, defense deals of this scope always come with efforts by powerful lobbies in Washington and Jerusalem to influence the decision, and it's anticipated that this time will not be any different.
 
Top