F-35 Joint Strike Fighter News, Videos and pics Thread

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Ok FYI per USNI news, the Washington Times, and defense news the Chinese have hacked a top secret submarine supersonic missile due to be introduced in the 2020s so it only makes sense they sure could do some damage to all the tech heavy systems ie.F35 among others
Washington times has a habit of Hyperbole, The USNI Story was covering the Washington times story. So Second hand. There have been claims of this for years. but there is a massive difference between might or a could into a Do. And what you are doing is trying to turn a "might be" able to in to a "do". As I have pointed out though That is not necessarily a Weakness unique to the F35 if they could break into the F35's Data systems and infect them they could do the Same to the Link 16 and flight computers of the existing Legacy systems. Even if they could That doesn't mean total kill either as Software changes and corrections can be made.
Since a number of our Members like to claim that the US also does such as well. I there for point out in the same line that in this same theory the US could disable SU57 or J20 or JF31 along the same lines.
 

dtulsa

Junior Member
Washington times has a habit of Hyperbole, The USNI Story was covering the Washington times story. So Second hand. There have been claims of this for years. but there is a massive difference between might or a could into a Do. And what you are doing is trying to turn a "might be" able to in to a "do". As I have pointed out though That is not necessarily a Weakness unique to the F35 if they could break into the F35's Data systems and infect them they could do the Same to the Link 16 and flight computers of the existing Legacy systems. Even if they could That doesn't mean total kill either as Software changes and corrections can be made.
Since a number of our Members like to claim that the US also does such as well. I there for point out in the same line that in this same theory the US could disable SU57 or J20 or JF31 along the same lines.
It' also being reported in the Defense news among other sites kinda alarming for sure at least to me it is very much so
 
It' also being reported in the Defense news among other sites kinda alarming for sure at least to me it is very much so
on this occasion, I'm with TE
Washington times has a habit of Hyperbole, ...
because now I've read that article

(it's
China hacked a Navy contractor and secured a trove of highly sensitive data on submarine warfare
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

)

and it says "Over the years, the Chinese have snatched designs for ... the Navy’s new Littoral Combat Ship ..."

which made my day, what a plot! hacking the lemon LOL!
 

timepass

Brigadier
F-35 to 2070? US AIR FORCE says 'software' will decide who wins future wars . . . .

1528401673248.jpg


Flying the F-35 all the way to 2070, blocking enemy missiles in mid-flight and using AI to quickly assist precision-guided weapons are all technologies which increasingly hinge upon rapid software development --- inspiring Air Force leaders to say “software” will determine who wins future wars.

Software upgrades, for instance, can give radar systems new threat information, provide improved seeker guidance for weapons and massively shorten sensor-to-shooter time by connecting otherwise disconnected networks and weapons platforms to one another in real-time.

Such technical advances, relying upon fast-emerging new computer algorithms, exponentially increase commanders’ ability to both see threats and attack enemies. All of this is fortified by growing applications of computer automation and AI.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

dtulsa

Junior Member
Washington times has a habit of Hyperbole, The USNI Story was covering the Washington times story. So Second hand. There have been claims of this for years. but there is a massive difference between might or a could into a Do. And what you are doing is trying to turn a "might be" able to in to a "do". As I have pointed out though That is not necessarily a Weakness unique to the F35 if they could break into the F35's Data systems and infect them they could do the Same to the Link 16 and flight computers of the existing Legacy systems. Even if they could That doesn't mean total kill either as Software changes and corrections can be made.
Since a number of our Members like to claim that the US also does such as well. I there for point out in the same line that in this same theory the US could disable SU57 or J20 or JF31 along the same lines.
Actually believe it or not I don't by the way there is a bill in Congress that allws for this very thing I guess just to make it official somehow
 
very interesting part of
Raytheon snags F-35 system business previously held by Northrop
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

:


Northrop chose not to bid for future DAS production after deciding that it was no longer an attractive business opportunity, said Kathy Warden, the company’s president and chief operating officer, in an April earnings call.

On Wednesday, Northrop spokesman Brian Humphreys elaborated, saying that the company “applied the same disciplined approach we use when considering all business pursuits and concluded that it wasn’t the right business deal for us.”
 
now this sales talk:
Pratt & Whitney is pitching a new version of the F-35 engine
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Pratt & Whitney is developing
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
that will give it the power and cooling necessary to make the U.S. Defense Department’s most sensor-heavy fighter jet even more of a powerhouse.

The new Growth Option 2.0 upgrade for the F135 engine, launched on Tuesday, adds a more advanced power and thermal management system that could be used to help the F-35 incorporate new weapons and sensors, the company said.

It also integrates a new compressor and turbine technologies that yield greater thrust and fuel savings, which were part of the Growth Option 1.0 concept unveiled in 2017.

In a June 12 interview with Defense News, Matthew Bromberg, president of Pratt & Whitney’s military engines unit, said the company decided to work on improvements to the F135’s power and thermal management system, or PTMS, based on feedback from the F-35 Joint Program Office.

Pratt in 2017 tested an early version of the Growth Option 1.0 motor called the fuel burn reduction demonstrator engine, which demonstrated that the upgrade could improve thrust by up to 10 percent and reduce fuel consumption by up to 6 percent.


But while the community that flies the F-35B short-takeoff-and-vertical-landing variant was gung-ho on the thrust improvements, the JPO said that better power and cooling was what was really needed — especially as the program transitions from the development phase to modernization, also known as Block 4 or Continuous Capability Development and Delivery, Bromberg said.

Pratt has already begun testing some technologies from the Growth Option 2.0 suite in various rigs and demonstrators. Bromberg called the upgrades “relatively low risk” and said it could probably be proven out in a four-year technology demonstration program.

But he declined to talk about completed testing or to quantify the new power and cooling improvements, saying only that they were “significant.”

Although the Defense Department hasn’t signed onto an upgraded F135 engine as part of the Continuous Capability Development and Delivery effort, Pratt executives have been hopeful that it will do so as it finalizes that strategy.

“As the F-35 program moves forward with the Continuous Capability Development and Delivery strategy, we strive to stay in front of propulsion advances needed to enable F-35 modernization,” Bromberg said in a statement. “We’re continuously assessing customer needs and responding with technology options to keep them ahead of evolving threats.”
 
Top