Trade War with China

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
Interesting twist on trade war heavy infighting within Trump admin
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Ross losing sway with Trump on China
By
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


05/14/2018 06:36 PM EDT
90

President Donald Trump once called Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross a "killer," but he has steadily become a bit player. | John Shinkle/POLITICO
By
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Wilbur Ross has been largely sidelined in high-stakes trade negotiations with China in the latest signal that President Donald Trump is losing confidence in his Commerce secretary, according to three people with knowledge of the matter.

Ross — whom Trump once affectionately called a “killer,” a high compliment in the president’s lexicon — has steadily become a bit player, with the president regularly leaning on Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer and White House trade adviser Peter Navarro.

The Commerce secretary’s standing took another hit this week when the president tweeted criticism of the department’s recent decision to block the Chinese phone-maker ZTE from accessing U.S. technology, according to a current administration official and a former official familiar with the internal discussions.

“He’s not a primetime player here,” said one trade strategist closely tracking the administration’s trade discussions.

With Ross marginalized, Mnuchin’s influence with the president is on the rise, according to current and former administration officials. The president has warmed to the idea of reaching an agreement with China meant to avert a lengthy trade war ahead of the midterm elections, a position backed by Mnuchin and other moderates in the administration.

Trump’s new openness to a deal is a sharp departure from his fiery rhetoric against China’s trade practices, and it would mark a major defeat for Navarro and Lighthizer, the administration’s strongest critics of Beijing.

The situation for Ross got worse on Monday when, one month after imposing what many analysts viewed as a “death sentence” on ZTE, he was forced to say the administration was reconsidering his decision to ban U.S. companies from doing business with the Chinese state-owned enterprise for seven years.

A former Obama administration official said the ZTE problem appeared to be of Ross’ own making. The Commerce secretary meted out an extremely harsh sentence on the company after it was caught violating the terms of a March 2017 penalty agreement that included a $1.19 billion fine and required it reprimand employees involved in the sales to Iran and North Korea.

Instead, many were awarded bonuses, incurring Ross’ wrath. The Commerce secretary's crackdown last week forced the company to file notice that it was ceasing major business operations.

“This does not seem to have been handled thoughtfully or strategically,” the former Obama administration official said. “This was something that they clearly didn't understand what a big deal it would be. And then for the president to cross the line into an enforcement matter is just unprecedented and a terrible precedent as well.”

“There's no doubt these guys [ZTE] are bad actors and deserve punishment. They admitted to lying to the Commerce Department,” the former Obama official said. “But the secretary has a huge amount of discretion at that point about what to do and from my perspective is you've got to be proportionate to what they've done.”

Trump’s Sunday tweet was at least in part a response to warnings from Chinese officials that crucial trade discussions could be undercut if the United States did not rethink Commerce’s ZTE decision, according to a former Trump administration official and another person close to the White House.

Many of the president’s aides, worried about the negative impacts of a trade war ahead of the midterm elections, are eager to reach a deal with China on trade that the president can cast as a victory.

“In order to avoid catastrophe, you need some trade wins and you need them soon,” the former Trump administration official said.

Mnuchin and other senior administration officials have been in direct discussions with the Chinese and one option under discussion is ratcheting back the penalties on ZTE in exchange for lifting Chinese tariffs on agricultural products, according to one person briefed on the issue. Trump is also laser-focused on reducing the United States’ trade deficit with China, another issue that could play prominently in the deal.

By
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Some hardliners in the administration are strongly opposed to such a deal, arguing that China can’t be trusted to follow through and worrying privately that the president is being swindled by more moderate aides who opposed his aggressive approach to Beijing. Some have also begun to gripe about Mnuchin’s central role in the talks, asserting that he is bigfooting other advisers and is too eager to clinch a deal with China.

Another administration official pushed back at the idea that Mnuchin was bigfooting other administration players, saying it was clear to everyone involved in the talks that Trump himself would decide the major components of any agreement with China.

Mnuchin is the highest-ranking Cabinet member involved in the talks with China, so protocol dictates that he leads the U.S. delegation.


Meanwhile, Ross’ relationship with Trump has been deteriorating for more than a year. During the transition and early part of Trump’s presidency, he was a central player in trade and manufacturing policy. But current and former administration officials said Ross infuriated the president by pushing a 2017 deal that reopened the Chinese market to U.S. beef — but only to a tiny portion of U.S. production from cattle raised without artificial growth hormones.

Ross also backed a Chinese offer in 2017 to cut its steel production capacity by 150 million metric tons by 2022.

Trump chafed when the beef deal came under heavy outside criticism and he rejected Ross’ proposal on Chinese steel capacity, calling instead for strict tariffs, according to the former Trump administration official.

“Wilbur in many ways has been his own worst enemy,” the former official said.

Ross was also a last-minute addition when Mnuchin led a delegation of U.S. officials to China in early May for high-level trade talks. Originally, he had expected to remain in the U.S. working on a potential steel tariff agreement with the European Union.

White House spokesman Raj Shah said in an email Monday that Trump has “full confidence in Secretary Ross and his efforts to bring the Chinese to the table and negotiate on behalf of American workers.”

"This anonymous report about Secretary Ross is incorrect," he said. "Talks remain ongoing."

White House spokesman Raj Shah said in an email Monday that Trump has “full confidence in Secretary Ross and his efforts to bring the Chinese to the table and negotiate on behalf of American workers.”

The Commerce Department did not respond immediately to a request for comment.


The turmoil comes as Chinese Vice Premier Liu He is due in Washington this week for high-level trade talks that grew out of the Trump administration’s threat to impose tariffs on up to $150 billion worth of goods because of concerns over China’s alleged theft of intellectual property.

Ross tried to downplay any connection between the talks and ZTE. “Our position has been that's an enforcement action separate from trade,” he said.

Trump appeared to contradict Ross in a tweet Monday afternoon: “ZTE, the large Chinese phone company, buys a big percentage of individual parts from U.S. companies,” he wrote. “This is also reflective of the larger trade deal we are negotiating with China and my personal relationship with President Xi.”

Still, the White House, concerned about the perception that Trump was trading away a criminal penalty on a Chinese firm for some gain on the trade front or Beijing’s cooperation in nuclear disarmament talks with North Korea, said the ZTE issue was just one of many in the “complex” U.S.-China relationship.

“The president has asked Secretary Ross to look into it, consistent with applicable laws and regulations,” Shah told reporters at a briefing Monday. China has raised the issue with the United States “at a number of levels, as part of bilateral talks on a number issues,” and not just in the trade talks, he said.

However harsh Ross’ decision last month to impose a seven-year year ban on ZTE may have been, Trump’s intervention in what is essentially a law enforcement matter may be even worse, some analysts said.

“Saying we're not going to enforce American law is a terrible precedent, especially with regard to the Chinese, but really in general,” said Derek Scissors, a China specialist at the American Enterprise Institute. “It's insane that we would let the Chinese off the hook.”
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
Wow... No wonder Russia went through to trouble to put this guy in office...

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Trump Orders Help For Chinese Phone-Maker After China Approves Money For Trump Project


WASHINGTON - A mere 72 hours after the Chinese government agreed to put a half-billion dollars into an Indonesian project that will personally enrich
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, the president ordered a bailout for a Chinese-government-owned cellphone maker.

Trump, despite his promises to do so during the campaign, has not divested himself of his businesses, and continues to profit from them.

“You do a good deal for him, he does a good deal for you. Quid pro quo,” said Richard Painter, the White House ethics lawyer for former President George W. Bush and now a Democratic candidate for Senate in Minnesota.


“This appears to be yet another violation of the emoluments clause of the Constitution,” Painter said, referring to the prohibition against the president receiving payments from foreign governments.

The White House did not respond to HuffPost queries asking if there was a connection between the “MNC Lido City” project and Trump’s directive regarding ZTE.

65b2b600cdc73aed55ac1bb04d196776

President Donald Trump and China's President Xi Jinping shake hands in Beijing on Nov. 9, 2017. (Artyom Ivanov via Getty Images)
At Monday’s daily briefing, Deputy Press Secretary Raj Shah referred questions about the Indonesian project to the Trump Organization. “That’s not something that I can speak to,” he said.

The Trump Organization on Monday acknowledged its involvement in the resort, but did not respond to questions about how much the company would make from its licensing or management fees.

ZTE phones have already been described as a security risk by the U.S. military and intelligence community. Two weeks ago, the military banned their use on bases for fear they could be used to track the locations of service members.

The new statement, however, still did not address the question of the Indonesian resort and the Trump Organization’s coming profit thanks to Chinese investment.

“This is stunning. They perpetually find new things to surprise me,” said Robert Weissman, president of the open government advocacy group Public Citizen. “The idea of the president intervening in a law enforcement matter to satisfy a foreign government is extraordinary. And it’s extraordinary because it doesn’t happen. Opening that door threatens the integrity of all corporate law enforcement.”

Shah, on other ZTE questions at the daily briefing, appeared to downplay the import of Trump’s directive to “get it done.” Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross will examine the matter “consistent with applicable laws and regulations,” Shah said.

He acknowledged, however, that the issue is of great concern to the Chinese and its president, Xi Jinping.

“In our bilateral relationship, there is a give and take,” Shah said.

During his campaign, Trump attacked China almost daily for “stealing” U.S. jobs by manipulating its currency and using unfair trade practices. “No one has ever stolen jobs like other countries have taken from us,” Trump told a Nevada rally on Nov. 5, 2016. “We’ve lost 70,000 factories since China joined the WTO,” Trump told a Pittsburgh-area audience the following day.

In recent months, Trump has been trying to craft a trade agreement with China at the same time he is asking for Xi’s help in cracking down on North Korea because of its nuclear weapons program.

At a National Press Club speech Monday, Ross said that the ZTE sanctions were an enforcement action, unrelated to the trade negotiations, but that he would be reviewing the situation “very, very promptly” as a result of Trump’s request.

For ethics advocates, the timing of the ZTE tweet on the heels of the Indonesian development announcement is yet another example of the consequences of Trump’s unwillingness to abide by the emoluments clause.

“The Chinese government seems to have figured out a way to manipulate President Trump,” Weissman said. “It’s exactly why this anti-bribery clause of the Constitution is common sense.”
 
after I had seen the newest posts here, I searched using google
“MNC+Lido+City"+Trump
and right on top is:
Trump Indonesia project is latest stop on China’s Belt and Road

Project is part of the Lido City development in Jakarta and is the first to link the US president’s business interests to Beijing’s epic infrastructure plan
UPDATED : Friday, 11 May, 2018, 11:17pm
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

A billion-dollar Indonesian property development with ties to Donald Trump has become the latest project in China’s globe-spanning Belt and Road infrastructure project – just as Washington and Beijing are tussling over trade.

A subsidiary of Chinese state-owned construction firm Metallurgical Corporation of China (MCC) signed a deal with Indonesia’s MNC Land to build a theme park outside Jakarta as part of the ambitious project, the company said on Thursday.

The deal is the latest to raise questions about the extent of Trump’s financial exposure to Beijing.

The park – expected to be backed with up to US$500 million in Chinese government loans – is part of an “integrated lifestyle resort”, known as MNC Lido City.

The project includes Trump-branded hotels, residences and a golf course, as well as other hotel, shopping and residential developments.

Referring to its subsidiary, MCC described the theme park as “the first culture and tourism industry project by the Central Research Institute of Building and Construction” and was “in response to” China’s Belt and Road Initiative.

It is also the first project to link the US president’s business interests to China’s signature infrastructure initiative, which aims to connect the world’s second-largest economy with Africa, Asia and Europe through a vast network of ports, railways, roads and industrial estates.

While the Chinese companies will not be directly involved in the construction or financing of the Trump properties, the theme park is a critical part of the 3,000-hectare development, which MNC describes as Indonesia’s “most prestigious entertainment & lifestyle project”.

Furthermore, Chinese companies are expected to put up US$500 million – half of the development’s projected budget – putting its success or failure in the hands of decision-makers in Beijing.

It is not clear to what extent the Trump Organisation was involved in the decision to include Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in the project.

But marketing materials for MNC Lido City refer to the theme park and Trump properties as flagship elements of the development, and corporate filings and internal documents show the Trump Organisation and the president’s sons have been directly involved in various stages of its planning.

Negotiations on the Lido deal began before Trump’s November 2016 election and subsequent pledge that his family business would not engage in new transactions with foreign governments during his presidency.

Still, “even if this deal is completely and entirely above board, it simply furthers the perception of impropriety” surrounding Trump’s business dealings, said Christopher Balding, an economics professor at Shenzhen’s HSBC Business School. “Especially with the potential trade war, this is not a good look … Critics will be entirely right to demand answers.”

China’s top economic official, Vice-Premier Liu He, heads to Washington next week for another round of negotiations over the hot-button issue of the huge imbalance in trade between the two countries.

Richard Painter, who was an ethics lawyer for former president George W. Bush, said the project was “problematic” and could violate a US constitutional emolument clause if Chinese government funds create profits for the Trump hotel.

“I would have advised him to sell the hotel and other similar holdings,” Painter said.

The Trump Organisation and MNC signed deals in 2015 for Lido and a Bali project, resulting in almost US$3.7 million in licensing and consulting payments for the Trump Organisation, according to MNC’s most recent annual report.

The Trump company will also earn management fees for operating the projects and be eligible for additional unspecified incentives.

In June 2016, MNC Land – a subsidiary of Indonesia’s largest media conglomerate MNC Group – signed a letter of initial intent with MCC. At the same time, MNC received “a letter of interest” from Sinosure, a Chinese SOE specialising in backing overseas investment projects.

MNC’s billionaire head Hary Tanoesoedibjo told local media the company would guarantee $500 million in financing from Chinese banks.

MNC representatives then made several trips to China to negotiate the theme park’s financing with Sinosure and the state-owned Bank of China, according to documents seen by AFP.

Hary flew to China for meetings about the project in October 2016, according to MCC’s website.

In January 2017, Hary travelled to New York and Washington for “a design review with Trump” and to attend the presidential inauguration, the documents showed.

Photos posted on Hary’s Instagram account show him in meetings at Trump Tower with Trump’s sons, Eric and Donald Jnr, and posing with Trump himself.

The Lido City project is not the first to raise eyebrows about Trump’s financial ties to China.

In early 2017, Beijing approved almost 40 trademark applications Trump had long sought to protect his business interests in the country.

McClatchy has previously reported the involvement of Chinese SOEs in another Trump project in Dubai.

Trump Tower houses the American headquarters of China’s ICBC bank.

MNC declined to respond to AFP’s questions about the project and MCC could not be reached for comment. Neither the White House nor the Trump Organisation immediately responded to emailed questions from AFP.
 

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
Here is FPGA(Field programmable gate array) another type of semiconductor that presently US has monopoly. But recently China too achieve breakthrough in this type of semiconductor
Via XYZ
primer
A field-programmable gate array (FPGA) is an integrated circuit (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
) that can be programmed in the field after manufacture. FPGAs are similar in principle to, but have vastly wider potential application than, programmable read-only memory (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
) chips. FPGAs are used by engineers in the design of specialized ICs that can later be produced hard-wired in large quantities for distribution to computer manufacturers and end users. Ultimately, FPGAs might allow computer users to tailor microprocessors to meet their own individual needs.

中国万能芯片获突破可用于相控阵雷达 打破西方垄断
2018年05月15日 10:44
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


gtranslate

Breakthrough in China's Universal Chip for Phased Array Radar Breaks Western Monopoly
May 15, 2018 10:44 Sina News Comprehensive
0

[Text/Observer column column authors]

A few days ago, at a military-civilian integration show, China Electronics' affiliate exhibited a fully forward-designed 35 million gate-level FPGAs. Subsequently, China Electronics subordinates publicly announced the successful development of 70 million gate-level FPGAs. After Trump personally vetoed the legend with a Chinese background, after the US-based private equity fund Canyon Bridge acquired the US FPGA design company Lattice, the technical breakthroughs made by China Electronics and China Electronics on FPGA are very encouraging.

Although these two FPGAs are quite different from giants such as Xilinx and Altra, they have exceeded the level of existing domestic FPGAs by a large margin in terms of FPGA scale. For some special fields, they can be solved. Part of the problem.

FPGA is a very important chip

The FPGA is a field-programmable gate array, simply a chip that can be programmed on it, and the user can program a special hardware acceleration algorithm on the FPGA. At present, there are three main application directions for this kind of chip.

The first is used on their own military equipment. A large phased array radar has thousands of TR components. Several TR components form a small processing unit to perform digital-to-analog conversion and preprocessing on the signals. Each unit contains an FPGA for data processing. Infrared devices also need FPGAs, and the US Defense Logistics Agency has purchased Xilinx FPGAs for data processing in infrared sensors in surveillance, reconnaissance, and fire control systems.

The second is used in communications equipment vendors. For example, Huawei and ZTE's multiple communication devices, communication base station is actually a small phased array, which must use FPGA for data processing. Existing communication equipment is also inseparable from FPGAs. For example, some time ago, the United States sanctioned ZTE, and FPGAs are also on the list of sanctions. The FPGAs required by Huawei and ZTE are mostly dependent on US companies such as Xilinx and Altra. import. It can be said that if the U.S. taps the Chinese neck on the FPGA, the construction of China's 5G communications network will certainly be affected.

The third is the chip design company used for simulation. FPGA has a call called "universal chip", that is to burn the code in, you can turn the FPGA into the required chip. This feature makes FPGAs widely used for chip simulation. What does that mean? For example, if Godson designed a CPU, it would be a multi-million-dollar loss if it failed to get a movie. In this case, the code is burned into the FPGA to test, through this test to find problems to solve the problem and reduce the risk of tape.

Some people may say that since it is a "universal chip," it wouldn't be easy to buy an FPGA and burn the code. This is mainly due to the fact that FPGAs are very expensive, like FPGAs purchased by domestic IC design companies from Xilinx, and the high-end products are worth more than RMB 400,000, while Intel’s common CPUs (with the exception of PHI) are generally a few hundred. Thousands of thousands of yuan. In addition, after the FPGA is burned into the code, the clock frequency is also very low, generally around 100 MHz, as the main frequency of Intel, AMD's latest CPU is about 4G. Therefore, FPGAs are more used for simulation to reduce the risk of CPU tapeout.

In addition, in the medical field, FPGAs are used in acoustic wave detectors, CT scanners, nuclear magnetic resonance, and other devices. With the rise of the Internet of Things, automotive electronics, robotics, and driverlessness, FPGAs may be used more widely.

This technological breakthrough has achieved a leap in technology

The threshold for entering the industry of FPGA is high. Over the past ten years, more than 60 companies including Intel, IBM, Motorola, Philips, Toshiba, and Samsung have tried to get involved in this field. In addition to Intel’s acquisition of Altra for US$16.7 billion, this company has successfully entered the field.戟 戟 Shen sand. After China’s former leader, Jing Micron, was still in trouble after accepting the nuclear high-grade project, and the last talent was lost to other domestic FPGA companies.

The reason why FPGA is so difficult is mainly due to the small market capacity and the difficulty of recovering huge amounts of investment. The industry is highly concentrated, and it is difficult for latecomers to confront the giants. Xilinx and the two leading architects of Altira build patent barriers to block the backward road. The special nature of the FPGA must be high-end, directly with the giants to fight bayonets, unable to take the first low-cost to seize the low-end market, and then step by step toward the development model of high-end.
 

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
(cont)
It is precisely because of this that the global FPGA market is basically monopolized by four companies in the United States: "2 big and 2 small." Most of the domestic FPGA manufacturers are in a relatively difficult stage of development, and the market share is very low. TongChuang Guoxin Chairman Zhu Changhua once said at a conference: “The global FPGA chip market is about 5 billion US dollars, of which China is about 1.5 billion U.S. dollars. Due to the relatively high technology and capital thresholds in the industry, U.S. manufacturers occupy a monopoly position. Among China's $1.5 billion market, domestic FPGA products account for about 2% of the market.

In addition to the low market share, there is a wide gap between the domestic manufacturers and the foreign manufacturers. Although domestic FPGA manufacturers have contending trends, they are basically distributed in low-end and mid-range markets. Most of them are FPGAs with about 10 million gates. Although a few FPGAs with 20 million gates have independent R&D, most of them are products of reverse engineering. , Or the result of a commercial acquisition, such as Beijing Micro Accord to rely on the United States CSwitch to develop a proprietary Tile structure.

The China Electronics Corporation's 35 million gate-level FPGAs and China Electronics' 70 million gate-level FPGAs are very exciting technological breakthroughs. Although the specific parameters still need to be further disclosed, but in terms of scale, compared to many domestic commercial companies, it is already a dusty ride. It can already meet the needs of many areas of use, and solve the problems. For example, an active phased array radar on a cutting-edge fighter uses an autonomous FPGA designed by the in-system unit.

Therefore, the technical breakthroughs made by China Electronics and China Electronics Technology Corporation are of great significance, and the problem of solving problems in specific areas is, after all, more than one hundred thousand or hundreds of thousands of chips is not like the CPU of Intel. There is a large amount of inventory in the private sector. There is also a big difference between military and civilian products. In the event of an emergency, the exhaustion of existing stocks will seriously affect the supplement of sophisticated weapons and information equipment.

Although in many ways, autonomous FPGAs have solved the problem. However, in the commercial sector, FPGAs in institutional units are also difficult to replace Xilinx and Altral products. After all, in terms of performance, the gap between domestic units and Xilinx and Altera's FPGAs is still very large. The industry insiders are very clear that independent FPGAs are still not up to the present, and currently only US FPGAs can be used.

Conclusion

All along, China hopes to acquire technology from abroad. However, the loss of Ziguang’s overseas acquisitions or joint ventures has already proved that this road is impossible. It is precisely because of this that Ziguang finally chose to dig people from Taiwan, South Korea and Japan, and take the road of independent research and development. As far as FPGAs are concerned, practice has also proven that the road to technology introduction cannot work.

Even if Canyon Bridge had already negotiated with Lattice, it was still under review by the U.S. Foreign Investment Commission. As Lattice is also very willing to be acquired by Canyon Bridge, it has repeatedly applied for release. However, Lattice’s plight fell on Trump, and Trump’s hope of using the president’s privilege to completely eliminate it.

The achievements made by China Electronics and China Electronics Corp. on FPGAs fully demonstrate that the road of independent research and development is fully able to go through. Some experts and leaders “have failed to introduce technology to choose independent research and development” and “taking the independent technology as a joint venture chip with foreign countries. Once the joint venture has set aside the autonomous technology”, it is worth reflecting.
 

s002wjh

Junior Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

We now know why Trump suddenly reversed course on sanctions against a Chinese tech giant

5ab4f0d9be459b19008b45e3-1536-768.jpg
Getty Images





    • President Donald Trump's decision to reverse sanctions on Chinese telecom giant ZTE was part of a larger trade agreement, according to a new report.
    • In exchange for easing the restrictions on ZTE, the Chinese government will not impose tariffs on US agricultural products like pork and wine.
    • The agricultural tariffs were imposed by China in response to Trump's steel and aluminum tariffs.
    • The deal is not finalized yet and details still need to be worked out.
President Donald Trump's stunning tweet suggesting that the US would
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
appears to be part of a larger deal to try and protect US farmers, according to a new report.


The Wall Street Journal
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
that in exchange for the removal of sanctions on ZTE, China plans to drop tariffs on a slew of US agricultural products including pork.


The deal may not go through, according to The Journal, and details are still being worked out. But, the existence of such an agreement would explain Trump's Sunday tweet in which the president suddenly reversed course on US penalties against ZTE.

"President Xi of China, and I, are working together to give massive Chinese phone company, ZTE, a way to get back into business, fast," Trump said. "Too many jobs in China lost. Commerce Department has been instructed to get it done!"

The Commerce Department hit ZTE with sanctions after the Chinese firm continued to do business in Iran and North Korea, a violation of US rules. ZTE was not allowed access to US-made parts for its phones and equipment, which
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.



Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
That larger deal did not mention the tariff on aluminum and steal which was the cause of China's tariff on American agriculture products. ZTE is just an add-on. Exchanging ZTE only without the aluminum and steel is not a good deal.

I even doubt the report WSJ being accurate.

We will have to wait to see what happens to the aluminum and steel.
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
Buy Korean. US suppliers should never be allowed back into China again as soon as options to supplant them are in place.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Samsung Could Start Supplying ZTE With Smartphone SoCs to Revive Its Business – Qualcomm to Face Heated Competition
Samsung is already the largest chip manufacturer in the world revenue-wise and is looking to expand its business by offering Exynos SoCs to external clients. The company recently knocked down Intel to become the world’s leading semiconductor-based chip manufacturer. However, Intel only makes chips for computers and servers, not for smartphones.

First ZTE Flagship Might Tout the Exynos 9820 if the Deal Goes Through
Samsung’s Exynos lineup only power smartphones and the company is reportedly now negotiating with various OEMs and may find a new client for its SoC by next year. This also includes the likes of ZTE, which was banned to feature U.S.-based companies’ hardware such as Qualcomm. This provides an opening for Samsung to incorporate its in-house chipsets in the company’s upcoming handsets.

Right now, Samsung’s only client for its Exynos chips is the Chinese company Meizu. Inyup Kang, Samsung System LSI head told Reuters that the company expects to finalize a new client for its processors by the first half of next year. Currently, Qualcomm is the biggest supplier of SoC to most major smartphone manufacturers, including Samsung itself, with the latest ones being the Galaxy S9 and Galaxy S9 Plus.

ZTE previously relied on Qualcomm for consistent sales of its mobile phones. America’s Department of Commerce ban on ZTE means it can’t source chips from Qualcomm any longer, as it is an American company. ZTE has ceased major mobile operations following the ban so it is in serious need of new vendors and Samsung could be the answer to its problems.

The ban on ZTE on the grounds that it was involved in ‘under the table’ deals with Iran could benefit Samsung in the long run. Samsung will be able to consolidate its position as the top chipmaker in the world because from next year, we might see a lot of Exynos-powered handsets flooding the market, with premium smartphones rocking
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
modems as well.

Samsung’s upcoming SoC is said to be the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, so perhaps this is the first in-house silicon from the tech giant that we might see present in a ZTE flagship. For the record, this SoC is expected to be in the Galaxy S10 as well and if you care to know more about the premier handset, you can check out our
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, which tells all the specifications, features, pricing and possible release date of the upcoming flagship.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top