Chinese Economics Thread

N00813

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

by
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
on April 25, 2018 1:00 PM EST
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
|
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


unisemiconductor_dram_678_678x452.jpg




Two more DRAM makers based in China, Innotron Memory and Fujian Jin Hua Integrated Circuit, are gearing up for volume production of computer memory in the coming month. Both manufacturers were founded with the help of the Chinese government, their output will initially be consumed locally.

Several years ago, the Chinese government announced plans to invest billions of U.S. dollars in the local semiconductor and adjacent high-tech industries and support appropriate companies directly and indirectly. Since the inception of the so-called Big Fund in 2014, not only over tens of billion were poured into various companies and initiatives (the plan is to invest $150 billion in the coming years), but the first actual results of their operations have started to show up. One of the industries that is developing fast in China is DRAM manufacturing. Earlier this year we reported about
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, which started to sell its DDR4 chips developed and produced in-house. Apparently, there are at least two more DRAM makers in China ready to start shipments of their memory modules in the second half of 2018 and the first half of 2019: Fujian Jin Hua Integrated Circuit (JHICC) and Innotron Memory.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
completed construction of its 300-mm fab in November and started to move in production tools late in 2017. According to a media report, the equipment move-in will be completed by early July and the first phase of the fab will be able to start volume production of DRAM in the third quarter. JHICC reportedly partnered with Taiwan-based UMC to develop its 22 nm DRAM manufacturing technologies, but at this point it is unclear which types of memory the company is gearing up to make. Some previous reports indicated that JHICC was looking at various specialized DRAM products (namely LPDDR4), but the actual plans might be different.

JHICC has already received the first phase of investment totaling $5.65 billion from the local authorities in Fujian, China. It is expected that aggregate investments in the Jin Hua DRAM fab will total $8 billion in the coming years. Manufacturing capacity of the JHICC’s memory fab is unknown, but the facility looks rather big on the picture.

Another China-based company that is getting ready to make DDR4 DRAM devices using its 22 nm fabrication process in the coming months is Innotron Memory (previously known as Hefei ChangXin and Hefei RuiLi). Innotron completed construction of its 300-mm fab in January and then started to move in production equipment. The company intends to start trial production of 8 Gb DRAM chips in late 2018 and then initiate volume production of these ICs sometimes in early 2019.

Innotron’s fab is not going to be very large: its initial capacity will be around 20,000 wafer starts per month in 2019, so in terms of volume it is not going to be a competitor for leading DRAM makers globally. Meanwhile, the firm intends to start building up the second phase of the fab in 2020 to boost its capacity. Furthermore, Innotron plans to complete development of its 17 nm process technology by 2021, the company announced recently.

Considering the facts that Innotron, Jin Hua, and Xi’an UniIC all had to start development of DRAM manufacturing technologies essentially from scratch, and their production capacities are not high, they are not expected to become viable competitors for companies like Micron, Samsung, and SK Hynix in terms of volumes, production efficiencies, or performance any time soon. In the meantime, there are more fabs incoming: in the recent years Tsinghua disclosed plans to invest $24 billion and $30 billion in memory chip production facilities near Wuhan and Nanjing, respectively. Furthermore, leading chip makers (Intel, Samsung, SK Hynix, etc.) already operate 3D NAND and DRAM fabs in China and invest in them to increase their capacities.

In the end, Chinese electronics industry will decrease their reliance on foreign volatile and non-volatile memory chips. Furthermore, it should be noted that it's questionable whether Chinese memory producers have all the patent/technology licenses they need to sell their products outside of China. Or for that matter with transnational semiconductor giants investing billions of U.S. dollars in China, whether they will be able to legally prohibit Chinese companies from building their presence on the foreign markets without facing problems from the Chinese authorities. The good news for the consumer is that with more 3D NAND and DRAM production in various parts of the world pricing of appropriate chips is going to decrease. The bad news is that without proper return-on-investments the progress of technologies may slow down.

Memory production is the first step towards establishment of a full-fledged self-sufficient semiconductor industry in China. Making memory ICs is relatively easy if you have appropriate process technologies, fabs, and clients to buy output. Designing competitive high-performance processors requires access to technology expertise and appropriate technology licenses from various companies. To boost its local SoC/CPU design industry, Tsinghua Unigroup
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Spreadtrum and RDA in 2013 (which have a license to build mobile SoCs based on select Intel’s x86 cores), then
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
an agreement with Intel to co-develop semi-custom server solutions. Meanwhile, Tianjin Haiguang Advanced Technology Investment Co., Ltd (THATIC)
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
an x86 joint venture with AMD in 2016.
 

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
China's biggest air terminal opens in Guangzhou
By Qiu Quanlin | chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2018-04-26 17:16
Stunning building
5ae19a24a3105cdce0a4ab7a.jpeg

A design picture of the new terminal at Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport. [Photo provided to chinadaily.com.cn]
The new terminal at Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport, a major civil aviation hub in South China, opened on Thursday, and will greatly boost domestic and international passenger and cargo capacity in the region.

T2, the largest single airport terminal building on the Chinese mainland — with a total area of 658,700 square meters — includes a wide variety of advanced automatic boarding and security check facilities, and boasts 58 passenger boarding jetways.

With the opening of T2, the airport — which now includes two terminals and three runways — will have a capacity of 70 million passengers this year, according to the airport authority.
 
China's biggest air terminal opens in Guangzhou
By Qiu Quanlin | chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2018-04-26 17:16
Stunning building
5ae19a24a3105cdce0a4ab7a.jpeg

A design picture of the new terminal at Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport. [Photo provided to chinadaily.com.cn]
The new terminal at Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport, a major civil aviation hub in South China, opened on Thursday, and will greatly boost domestic and international passenger and cargo capacity in the region.

T2, the largest single airport terminal building on the Chinese mainland — with a total area of 658,700 square meters — includes a wide variety of advanced automatic boarding and security check facilities, and boasts 58 passenger boarding jetways.

With the opening of T2, the airport — which now includes two terminals and three runways — will have a capacity of 70 million passengers this year, according to the airport authority.


Great looking terminal. Perhaps I can check it out on a stopover for next trip to South-east Asia.
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
Suggest you stop using the blanket term "the west" and just use "the US" it's shorter and much more accurate. As an example Canada by any one's definition is in the West but I don't think it matches the descriptions or narrative you're throwing out there.

I do include Canada.
 

hkbc

Junior Member
He is using the west because he sees countries like UK France Canada etc as having nonindependent foreign policy. Basically satrapies of USA.

I know you're just interpreting some one else's idea so it may or may not reflect your personal world view, but if Canada, as an example, doesn't have it's own foreign policy why has it not taken part in the US trade embargo and has maintained diplomatic relations with Cuba over the last 50 years?

The separate countries within the EU don't have an independent trade policy because it's negotiated by the EU on behalf of its members but it doesn't take any direction from the US. Each country in the EU Implements EU and UN sanctions, China as a member of the UN is also obliged to implement UN sanctions but like France, The Russian Federation, UK and US it has a veto,

Apart from the US everyone else in "the west" has signed up to the Paris Accords, the countries deemed part of "the west" all went ahead and signed the TPP even after the US bailed.

I can walk down the High Street here in the UK (and almost everywhere else in Europe) and pick up a Huawei phone that uses a chipset based off ARM IP, originally developed in the UK (before Softbank bought ARM), licensed to HiSilicon a Chinese company. In the other direction a Cyber Security Evaluation Centre was set up in 2010 which enables government experts to work with Huawei to give assurance that their products meet UK Government security standards and Huawei kit is widely used in UK telecom networks. The former isn't the case in the US and the latter was against the wishes of the US government see
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


If everyone in "The West" are singing from the same hymn sheet why are there all these "anomalies"?

Furthermore, if all these countries lack an independent foreign policy why does China maintain the pretence of having diplomatic missions with any of them, just a giant waste of time and money they could pour into R&D, why are they even talking to the monkeys, when you should be talking to the organ grinder!

The parable of overcoming a bunch of bullies is as old as writing and a pretty compelling narrative, but over exaggerate the story and even a child hearing it at bed time starts to question its validity.

End of the day people can say what they like. "hey, the sky is green" doesn't mean it has any basis in fact!
 

PiSigma

"the engineer"
I know you're just interpreting some one else's idea so it may or may not reflect your personal world view, but if Canada, as an example, doesn't have it's own foreign policy why has it not taken part in the US trade embargo and has maintained diplomatic relations with Cuba over the last 50 years?

The separate countries within the EU don't have an independent trade policy because it's negotiated by the EU on behalf of its members but it doesn't take any direction from the US. Each country in the EU Implements EU and UN sanctions, China as a member of the UN is also obliged to implement UN sanctions but like France, The Russian Federation, UK and US it has a veto,

Apart from the US everyone else in "the west" has signed up to the Paris Accords, the countries deemed part of "the west" all went ahead and signed the TPP even after the US bailed.

I can walk down the High Street here in the UK (and almost everywhere else in Europe) and pick up a Huawei phone that uses a chipset based off ARM IP, originally developed in the UK (before Softbank bought ARM), licensed to HiSilicon a Chinese company. In the other direction a Cyber Security Evaluation Centre was set up in 2010 which enables government experts to work with Huawei to give assurance that their products meet UK Government security standards and Huawei kit is widely used in UK telecom networks. The former isn't the case in the US and the latter was against the wishes of the US government see
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


If everyone in "The West" are singing from the same hymn sheet why are there all these "anomalies"?

Furthermore, if all these countries lack an independent foreign policy why does China maintain the pretence of having diplomatic missions with any of them, just a giant waste of time and money they could pour into R&D, why are they even talking to the monkeys, when you should be talking to the organ grinder!

The parable of overcoming a bunch of bullies is as old as writing and a pretty compelling narrative, but over exaggerate the story and even a child hearing it at bed time starts to question its validity.

End of the day people can say what they like. "hey, the sky is green" doesn't mean it has any basis in fact!
I'm just saying why he uses the west, not that I support it.
I'm Canadian, and I know how disfunctional our foreign policy is.
 
now I read
China further opens banking, insurance sectors
2018-04-28 03:00:56
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

China Friday rolled out a set of measures to open its financial sector wider to the world, including expanding business scopes of foreign-funded banks.

The new rules will allow foreign-funded banks to conduct business such as the underwriting of government bonds, and will lift foreign ownership limits on banks and financial asset management firms, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (CBIRC) said in an online statement.

Foreign-funded insurance brokers will have the same business scope as their Chinese counterparts, according to the statement.

The measures are in line with plans disclosed by authorities at the Boao Forum for Asia annual conference earlier this month.

As part of the country's broader opening-up push, China will encourage foreign investors to enter its trust, financial leasing, auto finance, money brokerage, and consumer finance sectors, a move that will take effect before the end of this year, China's central bank governor Yi Gang said at the conference.

Foreign businesses will be allowed to own up to 51 percent of shares in life insurance joint ventures, and the cap will be phased out over three years, he said.

The CBIRC will implement these measures as soon as possible, the statement said.
 

advill

Junior Member
Wow! Guangzhou revamped Airport has progressed tremendously. I used to arrive in Guangzhou at this airport about 20 years ago, when I was invited to conduct Int'l Biz Seminars at the University (Sunyat Sen) for the Executive MBA adult students. The Airport & Guangzhou City were already very impressive ... Don't think I will ever return, but my good memories live on.
 
now I read
China eases restrictions on foreign ownership of securities ventures
2018-04-29 13:28 GMT+8
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

China’s securities regulator has released new guidelines for foreign investment in Chinese security joint ventures in which it eased some restrictions and launched an application process for more foreign ownership.

The consultation period for the new rules that began in March is now over and the final regulations have been officially released for immediate implementation, the regulator said in an announcement on its website late on Saturday.

During the review, restrictions limiting single foreign investors to a 30 percent stake in securities ventures, either directly or via a partner, were removed, according to the China Securities newspaper.

Foreign firms that wish to make changes to their equity ownership in local securities joint ventures or that wish to establish a new joint venture can now apply to the regulator, it said in a question-and-answer published online.

The move is one part of China’s pledge to ease foreign ownership curbs to allow major international banks to bolster their presence in the securities business – from underwriting to trading – in the world’s second-largest economy.

Previously, Western banks could only own up to 49 percent of their Chinese securities joint ventures.
 
now I read
China sees more pension funds entrusted for investment
2018-04-29 19:17 GMT+8
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

China's local governments have entrusted more of their basic pension funds for investment, as the country moves to tackle the challenge of an aging society.

By the end of March, 12 provincial-level regions including Beijing and Shanghai had signed contracts to entrust a total of 475 billion yuan (75 billion US dollars) in pension funds to the National Council for Social Security Fund (NCSSF), according to the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security.

Of the total, 306.65 billion yuan is in place and has started to be invested, the ministry said.

Pensions in China were traditionally held by banks or used to purchase treasury bills with annual yields far below the market average.

Given an aging population, China faces more pension payment pressure and has been exploring ways to preserve and increase the value of its around 4-trillion-yuan of pension funds. Measures have been rolled out to allow investment in more profitable financial products.

The NCSSF said it earned an annual average return of over 8 percent on its investments over the past decade.

The country had around 240 million people aged over 60 at the end of 2017, accounting for 17.3 percent of the total population.
 
Top