US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

timepass

Brigadier
Lockheed’s $31 Billion Helicopter Slipping Behind Schedule, Pentagon Says...

1000x-1.jpg


"Lockheed Martin Corp.’s new $31 billion helicopter for the Marine Corps may be falling behind schedule and could miss its target for initial combat capability by as much as eight months, Pentagon analysts say.

Defense Department officials are tracking more than 1,000 current or projected “mission-impacting technical issues” that present “a high risk” to the CH-53K helicopter meeting its December 2019 goal, according to a program review document."

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Pusser01

Banned Idiot
Hi guys, I've just got a couple of questions regarding the USAF/USN/USMC Red Air contracts that are coming up this year.
Based on reading of interviews with Draken International, ATAC, TacAir & Top Aces (DADS) it appears as though most of the suppliers will need approx. 150+ aircraft to fulfil the requirement (if it is awarded to one supplier).
It seems as though most of the suppliers are intending to offer 3rd Gen aircraft that feature 4th gen features, noting that they have all indicated they aren't looking at former Eastern Bloc aircraft I was wondering what does this leave in the 2nd hand aircraft market?
Top Aces has indicated they are looking at 10-20 former Israeli F16A but then Draken, ATAC & TacAir have stated these might not be profitable to operate.
TacAir has purchased F5E's from Jordan but these are in need of fitting with a newer radar & avionics.
Likewise ATAC with their purchase of Mirage F1's from France & they say they need to upgrade the radar etc to be suitable.
With the recent purchases by Draken of Mirage F1M's from Spain & the Denel Cheetahs from South Africa, Draken has indicated that these don't require an upgrade.
It seems as though suitable 2nd aircraft that fulfil the requirement are a bit light on, especially if early F16, F18 models are too expensive.
What does this leave, the only few that I can think of is ex-Singapore F5S/T, ex Chile Mirage M50 Pantera (similar to the Cheetahs) & maybe ex-German F4 ICE, though these might be expensive to operate as well.
I'd be interested what other peoples' thoughts on this are, namely are there any other 2nd hand aircraft that would be suitable.
Cheers
 
Feb 17, 2018
OK, for the SDF record: LockMart will win according to me
of course I mean something like Jan 11, 2018

now

"A committee staffer said HASC determined the Navy’s one-LCS request was “damaging to the two construction yards” – the Navy had previously said it needed to buy three a year to maintain shipyard efficiencies and to keep both Austal USA and Fincantieri’s Marinette Marine healthy ahead of the frigate competition next year – and so the subcommittee recommended the full committee include funding for three ships. That would put the Navy at 35 LCSs total, compared to its stated need of 32, but the staffer said the move was meant to ensure the Navy had a good price point for the FY 2019 LCSs and, if either LCS builder is chosen to build the frigate, to allow for a healthy production line going into the new ship program."

inside

HASC Subcommittee Marks Recommend Additional Navy Ship Buys, Multi-Year Aircraft Deals
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


if either LCS builder is chosen to build the frigate, to allow for a healthy production line going into the new ship program

is the point
 
Tuesday at 10:49 AM
am wondering why

"Congress authorized the production of up to 13 Virginia submarines during that period, but the Navy has indicated it wants to build 12."
so:

"The FY 2018 NDAA authorized the Navy to buy up to 13 SSNs in a multiyear procurement contract currently being negotiated with General Dynamics Electric Boat and Newport News that would cover fiscal years 2019 through 2023. The Navy planned to buy the boats at a rate of two a year, but lawmakers wanted to preserve the opportunity to insert additional ships in up to three years, as industry is able to without adding risk to the top-priority Columbia-class SSBN."

(source is the USNI News linked in the post right above)
 

timepass

Brigadier
Navy Accepts Delivery of Future USS Michael Monsoor..

uss-michael-monsoor-1800.jpg


"The Navy has accepted delivery of the second of three stealthy destroyers.

A statement from Naval Sea Systems Command on Tuesday indicates the future USS Michael Monsoor successfully completed extensive tests, trials and demonstrations by shipbuilder Bath Iron Works."

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Feb 8, 2018
and
Marines Zero In On Requirements for Future MUX Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

...
... Army now:
‘Cost matters’ for US Army’s Future Vertical Lift aircraft buy, says vice chief
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

When the U.S. Army
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, as it has been planning to do for many years, cost will be a major factor in what is ultimately chosen for the fleet, according to the service’s vice chief of staff.

“The Army cannot afford to squander its finite resources. I know
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, but we can’t always assume that is the way it’s going to be in the future and risk our institutional credibility on massive programs that over-promise, under-deliver and die out under [their] own fiscal weight,” Gen. James McConville said during an April 26 speech kicking off the Army Aviation Association of America’s annual summit.

He stressed the importance of the price tag several times to reporters during a media roundtable at the event.

The Army has been taking steps toward procuring a new family of FVL aircraft with the aim of initially fielding in the 2030 time frame. The service has already built demonstrator aircraft to help define its requirements.

Both industry and Army leadership want to move more quickly in procuring capability to start replacing the current aging fleet of helicopters, but that will be contingent on when technology is ready ― and more importantly, when it’s ready at a price that the Army can afford, McConville told reporters during a briefing shortly after his speech.

“Cost matters, that is the driving thing as we look into the future,” he said. “We want to make sure when the technology matures and we can field it at the right cost. That is when we will go ahead and make the move, make the decisions to bring on that capability.”

For McConville, that life cycle cost of the FVL aircraft would ideally be lower than what the Army pays to keep its current fleet flying.

“As I talk to industry, I’m saying, ‘Don’t bring us something that is very exquisite and very expensive because we can’t afford it as we go forward,’ and so we want something that is along the same lines of cost with what we have right now, and even better if it’s less expensive,” McConville said.

While much must still be decided when it comes to FVL procurement, the Army has been weighing two major options for buying the new aircraft: prioritize the procurement of medium-lift aircraft to replace UH-60 Black Hawk and AH-64 Apaches, or buy an armed reconnaissance helicopter to fill the gap left from the OH-48 Kiowa Warrior’s 2014 retirement.

The Army still expects it will start fielding FVL aircraft in the early 2030s, but accelerating the timeline is not off the table.

“What we are doing right now is we are looking at the timeline, working with industry to see when they can get us the technology that is much more capable … certainly more capable right now,” McConville said. “And when they can deliver that with confidence then we will be in a position to make a decision on how we field that new rotorcraft or whatever that thing is and how we slowly do that over the years as the other aircraft go ahead and attrit out of the system.”
 
Saturday at 10:12 AM
Nov 9, 2017
now
Niger Ambush Investigation Complete, Families of Fallen to Be Briefed
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and
In Niger attack, risk-taking culture and complacency led to deadly ambush
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Poor training and a culture of risk-taking led to the deadly
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, according to officials familiar with a Pentagon report compiled in the wake of the ambush that left
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

Military officials familiar with the 6,000-page report described its findings to the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. The report included recommendations from Defense Secretary Jim Mattis to improve training and the chain-of-command for future operations.

Prior to the mission, military commanders displayed failures at multiple levels, according to the Journal. The report reveals that low-level commanders “took liberties to get operations approved through the chain of command.” In one instance, an officer copied and pasted orders for a different mission into the concept of operations to gain approval for the Oct. 4 mission.

Mattis gave Special Operations Command, or SOCOM, and Africa Command, known as AFRICOM, ten “primary directives” with a timeline of four months to address problems found in the report, one of which is to “reinforce normal protocols within the chain of command,” according to the Journal’s sources.

The report does not advise punishments for anyone, according to the Journal. However, the Army or SOCOM could seek to impose punitive measures if found warranted.

The four Americans killed in the ambush were Staff Sgt. Bryan C. Black, Staff Sgt. Dustin M. Wright, Staff Sgt. Jeremiah W. Johnson and Sgt. La David T. Johnson.

The soldiers were overrun by roughly 50 fighters claiming
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. Originally, the unit was conducting a joint security patrol with Nigerien partner forces. But the patrol was abruptly re-routed to search for a high-value individual thought to be in the region, reportedly named Doundou Chefou.

Although the ambushed troops did not capture Chefou, Nigerien forces detained a suspect believed to be the man last week, according to the American ambassador to Niger.

There are roughly 800 U.S. troops in Niger, and a
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
is now being built there. It will cost $15 million annually to operate and will be marked by both the American and Nigerien flags.
 
until now haven't heard of "strap pack nut"
anyway US Army’s AH-64E operational test gets delayed by a year
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The U.S. Army has decided to delay its capstone full operational test and evaluation for the newest variant of the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
by a year, the service’s program manager for aircraft told an audience April 26 at the Army Aviation Association of America’s annual summit.

A year ago, “we were talking about the [full operational test and evaluation] FOT&E occurring about right now,” Col. Tal Sheppard said. “It is not happening right now. We have delayed FOT&E for a year into the spring of 2019.”

The Army first fielded the AH-64 Echo model to units in 2013 and is now fielding the eighth unit equipped at Fort Riley, Kansas.

The reason the service decided to delay the operational test is because “we weren’t ready yet,” Sheppard said. “A year is going to get us ready, it’s going to help us mature technology.”

Additionally, the Army will now be able to run both the Echo model operational test simultaneously with the operational test of the Hellfire missile’s replacement — the Joint Air-to-Ground Missile. JAGM is
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


And the benefit of that is “we will minimize touches to [Forces Command] units for an operational test, and we save on some resources as well,” Sheppard said.

When asked if the delay had anything to do with the recently surfaced issue related to the Army not accepting Apaches from Boeing due to an issue with the current strap pack nut, Sheppard said the decision to delay was not connected.

Defense News first broke the news that the Army had stopped taking deliveries of AH-64Es from Boeing due to a lack of confidence in the durability of the strap pack nut, particularly its performance in severe, coastal environments where the service saw corrosion due to climate and stress.

Boeing is expected to have a redesigned nut ready to replace the old nut by the summer, and the Army will quickly work to replace the nut in all E models and D models that are fielded with the Army, the National Guard and international customers.

“I will say it was more high risk than it needed to be to have a successful [operational test],” Sheppard said.

That was mostly due to discovering in pretest events last fall that software related to the multi-core processor needed further refinement, he told Defense News at the AAAA summit, adding it is the first time the Army has installed such a processor on rotary-wing aircraft in the fleet.

“We’ve gone back to work with Boeing to ensure success this time around,” Sheppard said.
 
Apr 7, 2018
Mar 15, 2018
now the story goes on as 'Space Force' Idea Isn't Dead, Intel Chief Says
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and 'Space Force' Study to Be Ready by August: DoD Official
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The Pentagon hopes to deliver an interim report to Congress by August on whether it's feasible to carve out a separate "Space Force" branch from the U.S.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, according to a top Defense Department official.

Deputy Secretary of Defense Patrick Shanahan told reporters Tuesday the Pentagon, in conjunction with the Air Force, has spent the past six months weighing the fundamental transitions that would be needed.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"We'll finish the analysis [and] what changes we'll have to make in our organization, in our acquisition process, in our architectures, in how we integrate across the services, what offensive ... and defensive capability we'll need. And, based on the changes that are required, we'll say, 'What's the right construct?' " Shanahan said during a breakfast with reporters in Washington, D.C.

"We're on track to have our interim assessment June 1. We will provide our report to Congress in August, and the Air Force has been very, very responsive," he said.

Shanahan said developing an organizational chart and simply checking boxes is easy. But implementing a brand-new structure may create more risk than reward.

"Do we have the right leadership? Do we have the right changes?" he said, referring to setting up space systems "for a tactical advantage."

The Pentagon has been scrutinizing not only how the Air Force intends to beat back adversaries such as Russia and China in space, but also how it plans to buy new space systems in the future.

"If they can't do it, maybe it suggests we have to go a different way," Shanahan said. "And this is where we've been putting the Air Force and others to the paces: What changes can you commit to? And then really exploring the feasibility of those changes."

In March, President Donald Trump said he had an idea for a "space force," or separate military service for space. His comments came a few months after the Air Force indicated it was done talking about a separate military force for space.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
the concept is something some lawmakers have pushed the service to create in hopes of taking adversarial threats in space more seriously.

When asked about the issue Tuesday, Air Force Secretary Wilson said she has full confidence in the service and the latest budget request to know the Air Force is the right branch to handle the job.

"We are open to discussing ideas that people have in this realm," Wilson said during a
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

"I think the most important thing is not the organization, but what we actually do, and that is to defend ourselves on orbit and make clear to any adversary that, if they take us on in space, we will prevail," she said. "With respect to the bold moves and the changes, we are accelerating defendable space to deter, defend and prevail against anyone who seeks to deny our ability to freely operate in space."

"There's an 18 percent increase from the fiscal year '18 five-year defense plan to the fiscal year '19 five-year defense plan in space. And there's a significant changes there," she added.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
until now haven't heard of "strap pack nut"
anyway US Army’s AH-64E operational test gets delayed by a year
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
The
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
is part of the main rotor assembly it basically keeps blades attached. It's akin to a Jesus nut on a Huey, As in "JESUS please help that NUT keep the Rotors on or I will be quite Irate when I meet you."
 
Top