South East Asia Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

some time ago
Oct 22, 2017
this is also quite interesting article:
Total victory declared in Marawi over ISIL
7 hours ago
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
now this:
Philippine commando video shows Marawi in ruins after liberation from ISIS
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Philippine special forces produced a video celebrating the liberation of Marawi from ISIS militants, but the video highlights a shocking level of destruction inflicted upon the small city.

ISIS fighters managed to seize and hold onto the city for
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. It eventually was liberated by Philippine forces at the end of October, but at a tremendous cost.

The nearly 9-minute bloody and violent video shows the city in tatters as Philippine commandos and ISIS fighters fight out an urban battle, street by street. Artillery strikes can be seen pummeling buildings to dislodge ISIS fighters holed up in the city.

The video was first reported on by
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

The images are eerily reminiscent of the destruction of other major cities in the Middle East like Raqqa, Syria, and Mosul, Iraq. U.S.-backed fighters spent months liberating the cities from ISIS militants with the aid of U.S. air and artillery power.

“You liberate people, not bricks,” former British Army Maj. Gen. Rupert Jones, deputy commander for Operation Inherent Resolve, said in a televised August Pentagon press briefing. “Buildings can be rebuilt. Lives cannot.”

Noticeably absent from the Philippine video are American advisers who were on the ground advising Philippine commandos. But, evidence of American material support can be seen throughout the video.

The video shows Philippine forces equipped with an array of American weapons, including M4s, rifle optics, PEQ-2 laser designators, grenade launchers, machine guns, and Harris tactical radio systems.

The U.S. has been assisting Philippine military with its counterterrorism campaign known as Operation Operation Pacific Eagle-Philippines.

That assistance has come in the form of U.S. advisers and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance assets like U.S. P-3 Orions and Grey Eagle platforms, according to Molly Koscina, an information officer at the U.S. Embassy in the Philippines.

“The U.S.-Philippine alliance is built on a 70-year history of rich people-to-people ties, including a vibrant Filipino-American diaspora,” she said.
CPNTHZBESNGBBAXRQNCH2FHW4I.png

The Philippine city of Marawi in ruins as it is liberated from ISIS militants.(Screenshot/ Philippine Armed Forces)
 
now noticed (dated December 06, 2017)
U.S. Air Force completes delivery of 24 F-16s to Indonesia
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

After nearly five years, the Ogden Air Logistics Complex completed regeneration work on the last six Block-25 F-16C Fighting Falcon aircraft for the Government of Indonesia.

The delivery is the result of an aircraft acquisition and refurbishment agreement approved by the U.S. government to deliver a total of 24 Block-25 C and D variant F-16s to the Indonesian Air Force.

The aircraft, formerly flown by U.S. Air Force and Air National Guard units, had been warehoused by the Ogden ALC's 309th Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group located at Davis-Monthan AFB in Tucson, Ariz.

The jets will depart on a five-day transoceanic flight and will require mid-air refueling and two overnight stops before arriving in Indonesia.

In addition to Hill AFB's Ogden ALC, the F-16 System Program Office, Defense Logistics Agency and several other Defense Department organizations contributed to the success of this acquisition program.
171121-F-EI321-0340.JPG

Lt. Col. Beau “Strap” Wilkins, 514th Flight Test Squadron F-16, makes a high-speed pass in an Indonesian F-16C Fighting Falcon during a functional check flight Nov. 21, 2017, at Hill Air Force Base, Utah. The jet is the last of 24 F-16s to be delivered to the Indonesian Air Force as part of an acquisition agreement approved by the U.S. government. (U.S. Air Force photo by Alex R. Lloyd)
 

araberuni

Junior Member
Registered Member
Rosoboronexport screwed BAF on pricing, so BAF was forced to dump Su-30SME or Su-35 procurement plan. Rosoboronexport offerred Mig-35 instead. Bangladeshi media reaction...
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



Bangladesh’s previous Mig deal was a dud -- we should not repeat that mistake

Russian Mig fighter jets have been in the market for many decades, and are known as among the cheapest options for any air force.

A historical view of Mig

The new Mig-35 and its legacy Mig-29 have their baggage, and few success stories in any air warfare around the world from the Korean War to the Gulf War.

It was the Dassault Mirage jet which saved the Indian Air Force in the Kargil conflict, not the Mig. Although IAF has an extensive inventory of Migs, the Kargil success was one of the driving factors for IAF to select Dassault Rafale.

The modern 4.5 generation fighter

A modern fighter jet must offer technological and informational advantages over the enemy aircraft to be able to defend the skies successfully. This critical factor has to lead the development of an intermediate 4.5 generation fighter jet before bringing the fifth-generation fighter jet.

A 4.5 generation fighter jet must have an Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar and reduced radar cross (RCS). If the Mig is compared with its counterparts like Gripen NG or F/A-18E/F, then obviously the Migs lack an advanced radar and reduced RCS.

Almost all Russian fighter jets are manufactured with speed and agility in mind rather than avionics, radar, and RCS, including the recently developed Sukhoi-57.

A comparison with its European counterpart

The Zhuk-ME radar of Mig-35 is an X band radar manufactured by the Phazotron NIIR Corporation. According to an independent military think tank, Zhuk radar has +- 70 degree oblique view, not a Wide Field of Regard.

The radar uses multiple four channel transceiver modules generating an output of 5 watts per channel, installed on a liquid-cooled base plate to dissipate the generated heat. If a specific transceiver is overheated, it will be switched off by the radar computer until it cools down.

The Raven AESA radar of Gripen NG is an X band Active Electronically Scan Array (AESA) radar manufactured by Leonardo airborne and space systems. According to the manufacturer’s specification, the Raven radar provides plus/minus 100 degree wide field of regard.

The radar makes use of AESA alert-confirm techniques to confirm targets for the first detection. This combined with optimised AESA waveforms results in increased track initiation ranges, while simultaneously maintaining situational awareness.

This is combined with the full capabilities of a detection, tracking, and prosecution system to meet the needs of emerging threats.

The APG-79 radar of F/A-18E/F Super Hornet is also an AESA radar. According to manufacturer’s specifications, the APG-79 radar of the Super Hornet is optimised situational awareness and provides superior air-to-air and air-to-surface capability.

The agile beam enables the multimode radar to interleave in near-real time, so that pilot and crew can use both modes simultaneously. The manufacturer claims that the APG-79 AESA radar is built on solid-state transmit and receive modules to virtually eliminate any mechanical breakdown.

In short, if I translate this technical jargon into non-technical language, then the Zhuk-ME radar of Mig-35 can be compared with a visually impaired person, the APG-79 radar of Super Hornet with a person with excellent vision, and the Raven radar of Gripen to that of a person with perfect vision.

The Mig-35 RCS

The primary measure of stealth aircraft is the low observability (LO), also known as the radar cross section (RCS) of the target, whether this is an aircraft, missiles, or ships.

How does it work?

The radar pulse goes out from the transmitter, hits the target, and bounces back.

The radar receiver measures the energy in the return signal in decibel (dB) units, but that is a hard way for normal people to visualise the size of a target. So, you can convert the decibel to square metres to get the picture. So, for an aircraft with an RCS of 5 dB, it would be 3.16 square metres.

The RCS of an aircraft depends on its characteristics, the orientation of the target to the radar source. Many aircrafts will have a smaller frontal RCS, but bigger rear and side RCS.

Also, some fighter jets have their largest RCS from the side and the rear, due to the exhaust nozzles. Moreover, RCS depends on the wavelength of the radar signal and how far away the target is. The lower the RCS value, the less possible that the conventional radar will detect the aircraft from a distance.

According to military think tank mil-embedded.com, the Russian4++ generation Mig-35 has an RCS of 3 square metres and 4.5 generation Su-35 has an RCS of 3 square metres.

The 4.5 generation F/A-18E/F Super Hornet fighter jet has an RCS of 1 square metre. The next generation Gripen incorporated stealth designs into its basic structure without compromising performance. Hence, the Gripen ended up with such a low RCS of only 0.1 square metres.

If BAF procures Migs again, Bangladesh will end up spending hard-earned billions to achieve no technological and strategic advantage over any regional air force

The Gripen is a small fighter jet with low RCS, but computer modelling was used to optimise areas such as the curves of the aircraft and the engine intakes along with their inlet tubes to deflect radar waves. Special Radar Absorbing Materials (RAM) were also used in critical areas enabling the Gripen to lower its RCS even further and giving it an excellent advantage against radar.

To understand RCS in plain English, an average man has an RCS of about 1 square metre and a bird has an RCS of about 0.1 square metres.The challenge of a surface-to-air missile or air-to-air missile to shoot down a Gripen NG with RCS of about 0.1 square metres is like shooting down a bird flying at the speed of sound. For Mig-35 with an RCS of about 3 square metres, it is like shooting down a bus flying at the speed of sound.

The sales tactics

As of now, no details are available publicly about ToT from either Rosoboronexport or BAF. I doubt that Rosoboronexport is genuinely offering transfer of any vital technology to Bangladesh. It is the standard sales tactics worked in the past 50 years towards India, but China is an exception.

China received large-scale assistance from the Soviet Union during The Sino-Soviet Treaty of Friendship, Alliance, and Mutual Assistance.

Due to massive industrialisation, China is able to reproduce Soviet-made weapons domestically.

The Russian sales tactics led to the Indian Air Force dearly having no spare parts for its Sukhoi fleet, and an abundance of fighter jets are resting under the Indian hanger.

The Bangladeshi point of view

As for Bangladeshi MRCA deals, Russia will behave the same way they did with India and Iran. Once the sales are over, Russia will withdraw the support and supplies of spare parts. Bangladesh’s previous Mig deal was a dud, and until recently, those Migs were stored under the hanger.

If BAF procures Migs again, Bangladesh will end up spending hard-earned billions to achieve no technological and strategic advantage over any regional air force.

The BAF should ask one question: Are they offering free target drones as Mig-35 to Myanmar Air Force?

Raihan Al-Beruni is a contractor and analyst for a global defense and security supplier based in Australia.
 

Dizasta1

Senior Member
It's better to fly a bus with missile slung under, at the speed of sound, than to fly an over priced bird that needs to be handled with kid-gloves and can be sanctioned anytime the West "thinks" that you're not towing their line.
 

araberuni

Junior Member
Registered Member
Are you sure ????? ....Kargil Success...:D:p


Dude, I get it you are a Pakistani national. Kargil issue hurts your feelings. May I know why Pakistan does not engage junk fighter 17 in any conflict? A recent report by the Diplomat suggests that Indian Army special ops went inside Pakistan and killed terrorists.

How many times you guys get surprised?
 

Dizasta1

Senior Member
Dude, I get it you are a Pakistani national. Kargil issue hurts your feelings. May I know why Pakistan does not engage junk fighter 17 in any conflict? A recent report by the Diplomat suggests that Indian Army special ops went inside Pakistan and killed terrorists.

How many times you guys get surprised?

Irrespective of my nationality, I seek out facts rather than conjecture. To date, no factual evidence has been brought forward to support the indian claims that they crossed into Pakistan's territory and destroyed some made-up, fantasy terrorist camp. Lest the world forgets how much Pakistan has contributed in the destruction of terrorists. More than what NATO or the U.S have done combined. As for the indians, their hubris is their doom. For all the slaughter of innocent Kashmiri Muslims cannot be covered up by a delusional theory of "State Sponsored Terrorism." Something the indians have been trying from Afghanistan (with the blessings of the West mind you) for the last 16 years. So don't make the mistake of confusing Pakistan's support for Kashmir, which ought have been part of Pakistan or an independent Muslim state, with some sort of terrorism. Had it not been for Kashmir, Pakistan would not want to have anything to do with india.

As for Kargil, well it was a brilliantly executed plan, if it were in 2017. But it was done back in 1999, when our military was shifting from U.S military hardware, to a diversified one. Plus we had a whus for a Prime Minister who ran like a sissy to Washington DC. Victory in Kargil cannot be claimed by either side. But it was an embarrassment for the mighty indian military to have been caught with its pants down and nowhere to run when it happened.
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
Not too familiar with the Kargil conflict but a quick search shows that Pakistan lost ~400 soldiers while India lost ~540, two fighter jets, and a helicopter. End result was no exchange of territory. This is despite that India brought 30,000 troops against Pakistan's 5,000. Doesn't sound like an Indian success to me.

They haven't used JF-17 in any high intensity conflicts because Pakistan didn't get it until 2007 and there hasn't been any conflicts since... unless you count fighting against insurgents as a conflict worthy of fighters in which case the JF-17 was deployed on those missions. Regardless, it's seen a lot more use than Tejas.
 
Last edited:
Top