Russian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

... ( I say Ironic as the whole reason for guided munitions is to reduce collateral by having a higher chance to hit enemy targets.) ...
also ironically, Savages then, with surgical precision, are able to hit their person of interest for example inside a funeral house:
Oct 9, 2016
related:
CuRzphHW8AAwYEa.jpg:large
(if it's a fake, blame the source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
)​
thus reducing the collateral damage as compared to if they had carpet-bombed the whole residential district with said funeral house
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
Bold of Russia to tell Norway, a NATO country, to stay out of the alliance missile defense program. On the other hand, Trump declared NATO obsolete, so maybe it's not so bold of Putin after all. I wonder if Norway will agree to pay more money for US protection.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

From Russian Embassy in Norway: Deployment of strategic missile defense capabilities within the global missile defense system might potentially jeopardize the efficiency of Russian strategic nuclear forces as a means of deterrence. A further improvement of the missile defense system, an increase in their numbers and their further approach towards the borders of Russia (and, as a result, to the places where the Russian strategic missiles are located) will only make the situation worse. This will mean a serious undermining of the strategic stability and hence also that the character of the whole system of international relations will be less stable and more unpredictable. USA and the NATO-countries understand this very well... A group of specialists from the scientific institute of the MOD of Norway, together with the American agency for the global missile defense system, are working on the parameters for a possible Norwegian contribution to the missile defense system of NATO. Oslo takes part in the US-lead Maritime Theater Missile Defense Forum and exercises held within the framework of this forum. Five Norwegian frigates could be used by the missile defense system. They are fitted with the missile weapon system Aegis. It has been announced that a new radar within the framework of the modernization of the Globus-2 radar station in Vardø will be built before 2020. This radar might, according to experts, perform tasks for the missile defense system…. What should Russia do in such a situation? Believe in the empty words of representatives of NATO when they say that this system is not aimed at Russia? Since US/NATO/Norway does not want to solve this question through diplomatic channels or through talks, then the only answer left is the military-technical one. Russia has to upgrade its strategic nuclear forces so that they will be capable of surmounting any missile defense system. Excerpts from Russian letter to Dagbladet newspaper in Norway, March 9, 2017. From Norway Today: In a letter to Dagbladet newspaper, Russia warned again about the consequences if Norway chooses to be a part of the NATO missile shield. The Government has appointed an expert group to consider a possible Norwegian contribution to the missile shield, something Russia reacted very sharply on. The new letter also adopted a harsh tone…. “Russia would have to strengthen its strategic nuclear forces, to make them able to overcome any missile shield,” was the message from the Russian embassy in Oslo…. Earlier, Russia threatened a strong response if Norway is serious about contributing to the missile shield. ‘In the case of NATO missile defense systems being deployed in Norwegian territory, we will have to react to defend our security’, said press attaché’, Maxim Gurov, at the Russian embassy to Klassekampen newspaper in January.
 

Gloire_bb

Captain
Registered Member
Nervous about the snarling bear.
It won't save Norway from snarling bear if one really will decide to, probably directly otherwise. But it will bring countermeasures, since it actually tries to affect US/Russia strategic balance.

Guess what kind of weapons will be attracted to nuclear balance-related assets?
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
It won't save Norway from snarling bear if one really will decide to, probably directly otherwise. But it will bring countermeasures, since it actually tries to affect US/Russia strategic balance.

Guess what kind of weapons will be attracted to nuclear balance-related assets?
NATO is a military alliance, and it can't have Russia (or any other state) dictating to one of its members, without addressing it as an alliance. If Norway is willing to kowtow to Russian demands on missile defense deployment, then NATO should either overrule it or demand Norway choose to leave or stay in NATO.
 
Top