Aircraft Carriers III

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Ocean is not boring save she :)
The idea to modify the POW to be an ad hoc LHD...and perhaps the QE too...is well, pardon my language, but asinine.

The should both be (and remain) carriers and the RN should build a couple of true LHDs to replace the Ocean.

You can only afford to cut back and have various ships perform two or more functions so much.

Sooner or later you find that you need both functions at the same time and you simply do not have the hulls to do it...and then you come into a world of hurt.
 
Last edited:

Obi Wan Russell

Jedi Master
VIP Professional
The idea to modify the POW to be an ad hoc LHD...and perhaps the QE too...is well, pardon my language, but asinine.

The should both be (and remain) carriers and the RN should build a couple of true LHDs to replace the Ocean.

You can only afford to cut back and have various ships perform two or more functions so much.

Sooner or later you find that you need both functions at the same time and you simply do not have the hulls to do it...and then you come into a world of hurt.
The current plan as I understand it is for both ships to have the dual capability to act as CVA and LPH as required, indeed given their size they are capable of doing both jobs at the same time. With the standard peacetime air group of 12 F-35Bs, 6 Merlin HM2 (ASW) and four HM2(AEW) embarked, there will be room aboard ship to also embark a sqn of 8 Merlin HC4s and a sqn of RAF Chinooks as well as a Royal Marine Commando ~900 men. No structural modifications need to be made, as the capability was designed in from the start, following the example of the Invincible class CVS. The difference being the older ships had to debark all their strike and ASW/AEW aircraft in order to switch to the LPH role; the QECs can do both roles simultaneously.

In related news, 820 NAS has reformed as a complete unit ready to deploy aboard HMS Ocean for the next six months, after which the squadron will be fully worked up and ready to deploy aboard HMS Queen Elizabeth as her first assigned squadron! The Helos have already had 'Big Liz's name applied on their nose's and are looking forward to going aboard the new carrier in late spring/early summer:CU160088045.jpg CU160088024.jpg
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Yes...they is no dount that they <i>can</i> do it.

But as events heat up, I'd rather have two QEs loaded with 48 F-35Bs, each, 8 Merlin HM2 (ASW) and 6 HM2(AEW) embarked.

Lot's of heated rhetoric being spouted out around the world (mainly due (IMHO) to weakness in languauge and in building in the west that will emboldens potential adversaries.

With two QE's completely loaded as I speak of would do a lot to set that tye g tale to rest.
 

Obi Wan Russell

Jedi Master
VIP Professional
I'll be happy for now knowing when the brown smelly stuff hits the air circulation unit, 'Big Liz' will deploy with at least one RN sqn of Lightnings and probably another two USMC sqns of F-35Bs. as well as all the RN helos to fill out the decks. The RAF will of course make every effort to keep their feet dry and be looking for the nearest friendly airbase with a comfy hotel close by... as usual!;):cool::)
 
We shall see.

As I said...when you bring this much noire technology forward, it is costly, almost no matter how you slice and dice it.

...
... and I've been blaming "concurrency"

(as in
... if the class is to serve into 22nd Century (LOL that's the first time I've ever written that date), why rush with first of the class AND RISK THE CLASS IS CUT AFTER CVN-80 because of delays, cost overruns etc.??
(I guess the answer would be it's because 15 or ten years ago concurrency had to be incorporated into the design, as back than only so called transformational projects had a chance to get funded, revolutionary changes to the battlefield of the future transforming it into higher dimension, LCS, F-35, ...)
just one example, I have more :) )

and I predict in the future US Military acquisitions "concurrency" on the scale of the Fords, LCS, or alas! F-35s, will be no go,
and I think "concurrency" on that scale was a wrong idea
(not just in the US; this:
"So while the Type 45 is characterised by approximately 80 per cent new-to-service equipment and 20 per cent reuse, these percentages will be effectively reversed for Type 26."
p. 120 of the Royal Navy official
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

sounds as "lessons learned" to me)

for now, I'll leave it ... time will tell
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
The current plan as I understand it is for both ships to have the dual capability to act as CVA and LPH as required, indeed given their size they are capable of doing both jobs at the same time. With the standard peacetime air group of 12 F-35Bs, 6 Merlin HM2 (ASW) and four HM2(AEW) embarked, there will be room aboard ship to also embark a sqn of 8 Merlin HC4s and a sqn of RAF Chinooks as well as a Royal Marine Commando ~900 men. No structural modifications need to be made, as the capability was designed in from the start, following the example of the Invincible class CVS. The difference being the older ships had to debark all their strike and ASW/AEW aircraft in order to switch to the LPH role; the QECs can do both roles simultaneously.

In related news, 820 NAS has reformed as a complete unit ready to deploy aboard HMS Ocean for the next six months, after which the squadron will be fully worked up and ready to deploy aboard HMS Queen Elizabeth as her first assigned squadron! The Helos have already had 'Big Liz's name applied on their nose's and are looking forward to going aboard the new carrier in late spring/early summer:View attachment 33023 View attachment 33024
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Yep versatile for compensated retirement of Ocean but less specialized CV it is the problem... planned for host 500 troops, Ocean 800 so necessary 2 Bulwark in service, now 1 in reserve, not ready.

A full RM Cdo i have 700 Troops :) ofc can be hosted sure by Ocean, Albion can in surge, 705 Troops, maybe QE also in surge capacity for some days max about a week before landing operations not long deployment with troops aboard.
In surge an AA Ships can in average host about 1/3 of troops in more than normaly, surely a San Antonio can host up to 1000 troops.
 
interestingly The Navy Is Quietly Arming Super Carriers With Anti-Torpedo Torpedoes
The growing threat of submarine attacks on US carriers is being partially addressed by a close-in weapons system that shoots back at incoming torpedoes.
The danger posed to Navy surface combatants by submarines
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. Spurred
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, even small and relatively inexpensive
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
can be as quiet their nuclear counterparts and still stay submerged for weeks at a time. The proliferation of this technology–as well as expanding fleets of Chinese and Russian fast attack nuclear submarines–have made America’s nuclear supercarriers vulnerable to attack despite a multi-layered defensive umbrella.

This umbrella includes a host of aerial and surface defenses, from long-range missiles and manned aircraft, to the RIM-116 Rolling Airframe Missile and Mk15 Phalanx
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. A carrier’s submarine defenses use a similar layered approach, though historically they have lacked a close-in defensive system capable of countering incoming torpedoes.

Currently a carrier’s submarine defenses includes cruisers, destroyers and even Littoral Combat Ships, each equipped with sonars and torpedo systems. Supercarriers also travel with a small armada of sub-hunting
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, deployed on the carrier and its escorts. Even land-based
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
support Carrier Strike Groups, and those airborn assets are being equipped with ever more
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. Yet, among all of those heavy hitters, the Carrier Strike Group’s most potent anti-submarine weapon might be
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
assigned to it.

Still, even under the umbrella of all these defenses the centerpiece of the Carrier Strike Group, the carrier itself,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. A single lucky shot could have horrific consequences for the ship, its crew, and even the world’s geopolitical balance.

So, what happens when a submarine is able to take a pot shot at a carrier, and its torpedo is in the water barreling towards the ship?
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
at confusing incoming acoustic homing torpedos, but they don't offer a “hard kill” capability, where the torpedo is physically destroyed or disabled before it can detonate dangerously close to the ship. Wake-homing torpedoes offer an even more complicated tactical scenario for American and allied surface combatants, and especially massive carriers.

Russia’s Type 53 torpedo and–its export variants in particular–possess a troubling attack profile for American carriers. They can be fired from over a dozen miles away and home in on the wake churned up by a ship. During their terminal attack phase, they ping-pong back and forth across a wake in an ‘S’ pattern until detonating in close proximity to the ship’s fantail. Acoustic decoys have no affect on this type of torpedo, and the bigger the wake, the easier the target is to successfully engage. The Type 53 can be fired by cheap and plentiful
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, which are used by the vast majority of the US Navy’s potential opponents.

In the Navy’s search for a close-in torpedo defense system, they wanted to address wake-homing torpedos. As such, not only would a way to detect incoming torpedoes have to be fielded as part of this holistic system, but a way to destroy them before they're close enough to the ship to do serious damage would also have to be developed. Enter the Surface Ship Torpedo Defense (SSTD).

SSTD, which was developed fairly rapidly over the last decade, is a combination of systems that work together to defend the carrier (and eventually other smaller surface combatants) against torpedo attacks. It includes three major components. The first is a towed array acoustic sensor system called the Torpedo Warning System (TWS) that does just as it says, it detects an incoming torpedo. This sensor is trailed off a carrier’s fantail, so it's particularly well suited for detecting incoming wake-homing torpedoes. This towed array is tied to tactical control stations that provide early warning, threat classification amd course of action advice to the ship’s Combat Information Center and bridge. The third and final component of SSTD is the Countermeasure Anti-Torpedo (CAT).

The CAT, which has been developed by Pennsylvania State University Applied Research Laboratory, is analogous to the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
but instead of anti-ship missiles or fast-attack boats, it targets targets incoming torpedoes. A miniature torpedo in its own right, CAT provides a rapidly deployable kinetic “hard kill” solution to use against torpedo threats. In other words, it can be launched in an instant, then it homes in on the enemy torpedo and destroys it through proximity detonation and/or collision. In simpler terms it is a torpedo interceptor.

CAT's design is flexible and future versions could also act as decoys for certain enemy torpedo types, leading them away from the carrier (or whatever the launching ship may be) before detonation.

CATs are installed in self-contained launch containers attached to a multi-cell launch system. These systems are placed around a ship, similar to other CIWS systems, and are launched on remote during an attack.

It may sound like a concept, but this system is already deployed and operating; the Navy has quietly fielded it on half of America’s supercarriers. The first test unit was installed aboard the USS George H.W. Bush in 2013. During these initial carrier-borne tests, SSTD was launched against and intercepted seven target torpedoes. The trials proved that the whole system as an integrated unit worked and since then many improvements have been made. Now, just a few years later, USS Nimitz, which just came out of an extended overhaul period, is the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

Eventually the Navy plans on fitting all its major surface combatants with SSTD, with a target date of 2035 to accomplish that goal. It will be interesting to see if the Navy attempts to integrate the system
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, a ship which will by very nature of its mission be prowling in submarine infested waters. Then again, they may not even attempt to such an installation at all, just
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
from its design. In the meantime America’s carriers will continue to be outfitted with these new torpedo defenses as they receive major service and upgrades. It's very likely “Gator Navy”
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
will be next.

Having a torpedo close in weapon system (CIWS) is quite the accomplishment for the US Navy. When combined with advanced expendable and towed decoys, the system should provide a fairly robust and much needed last line of submarine defense for America’s largest and most expensive weapon systems.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Obi Wan Russell

Jedi Master
VIP Professional
Yep versatile for compensated retirement of Ocean but less specialized CV it is the problem... planned for host 500 troops, Ocean 800 so necessary 2 Bulwark in service, now 1 in reserve, not ready.

A full RM Cdo i have 700 Troops :) ofc can be hosted sure by Ocean, Albion can in surge, 705 Troops, maybe QE also in surge capacity for some days max about a week before landing operations not long deployment with troops aboard.
In surge an AA Ships can in average host about 1/3 of troops in more than normaly, surely a San Antonio can host up to 1000 troops.
As the Falklands War and other later operations proved, when deploying in combat the peacetime rules for how many troops can be embarked aboard any given ship go out the window. I have no doubt the QECs can carry as many troops as Ocean can and probably more.
 
Top