ISIS/ISIL conflict in Syria/Iraq (No OpEd, No Politics)

how are you
erlen
?
welcome to
ISIS/ISIL conflict in Syria/Iraq (No OpEd, No Politics)
Thread, where I'm afraid a translation or at least a description is needed for stuff in Arabic to be useful ... but I'm not a quitter :) and used
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


"Band Sultan Murad :: scenes from the battle to liberate hand Aghanndorh one of the main strongholds Daesh addition to the five villages"

would you care to tell us more?
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
France is deploying its artillery in Iraq, before his aircraft carrier

PARIS (Reuters) - The deployment of the French artillery provision of the Iraqi army is being announced Tuesday Jean-Yves Le Drian, who confirmed the upcoming deployment of the aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle on the Iraqi theater -syrien, where it will provide air support to the Islamic State combatant forces.

Both measures were announced by François Hollande on July 13 as part of the intensification of the French support to Iraqi forces.

"In the Levant, Daech (Arabic acronym for the Islamic State-Ed) back on all fronts under the pressure of local forces supported by the international coalition," said the defense minister in closing the Summer University Defence in Paris.

"In this reconquest, we decided to support more Iraqi forces this autumn with the aim of taking Mosul, Baghdad caliphate proclaimed," he added.

"Right now, artillery settled near the front line to provide specific support to the Iraqis and our battle group (which includes the aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle-) is getting ready to sail ".

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Sunday at 5:13 PM
"peto lucem" this afternoon:
Crg-rrMUsAAGxTc.jpg

(it's
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
)​

a comment: even more significant (if confirmed) could be recapturing Qarassi by Government today ("road to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
open")

...

I'll look at Southern Aleppo on Wednesday
since then non-Government sources acknowledged Rebels were in trouble; one example:
%D8%AE%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%B7%D8%A9-%D8%AD%D9%84%D8%A8-1024x938.jpg

(it's
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
)​

now pro-Government view:
CrsLKSaWYAAOegV.jpg

(Qarassi besieged according to "Cassad":
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
)

after five weeks, the tide has turned! now I looked very quickly back and it seems Government went beyond
Aug 1, 2016
I'm going to update this post.
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Jura, you look for Aleppo, i look for Mosul LOL

I write also according your wish for you can quote as you love do it :):rolleyes:

The American artillery strikes ISIS from southern Turkey

Last March, from Jordan, the American artillery had targeted the positions of the Islamic State (EI or Daesh) near al-Tanf (Syria), using a multiple rocket launcher type M142 HIMARS (High Mobility Artillery Rocket System).

It was not the first time that the US military was implementing a HIMARS against IE. Earlier, two such systems had indeed been made to Taqqadam and al-Asad, in northern Iraq. In November 2015, they had already fired 400 rockets.

In April it was announced that two other HIMARS would be deployed as part of the anti-EI coalition. And one of them was to be installed in southern Turkey, subject to obtaining the Ankara Agreement. Negotiations were then initiated and Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlüt Cavusoglu had assured at the time that the US system would be implemented from May.

Finally, it was not until early September to see into action the M142 HIMARS. Indeed, Major (Commander) Josh Jacques, a spokesman for the US Centcom, the US military commander for the Middle East and Central Asia, said the mobile rocket system "newly deployed" Turkey "targeted and hit on Friday [September 2] a tactical unit and a building belonging to the IE", without giving further details.

"HIMARS is remarkable in its ability to reduce collateral damage potential when it reaches a target at a high angle, has a relatively small shock wave compared to the result and work through any time," argued Major Jacques .

Developed by Lockheed Martin, the M142 HIMARS is indeed capable of firing guided by GPS GMLRS rockets to destroy targets located 70 km away, whatever the weather. It is also able to launch ATACMS missiles, with a range of 300 km.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
French artillery now :cool:

The French guns are being deployed in Iraq, about thirty kilometers from positions of ISIS

A few days after the attack in Nice, claimed by the Islamic State (EI or Daesh), the President Hollande announced on July 22 its decision to "make available to the Iraqi forces artillery means" in As part of the Chammal operation, without giving further details.

September 6, the Minister of Defence, Jean-Yves Le Drian, has not given more, except that artillery are currently being deployed in Iraq. "We decided to support more Iraqi forces this autumn with the aim of taking Mosul," he has said, during the Summer of Defense. "Right now, artillery pieces are installed near the front line to provide specific support to the Iraqis," he added.

For the French minister, the "fall of the alleged Islamic state is now a matter of time" since "his last supply routes from Turkey have gradually cut. "But it remains to take Mosul (Iraq) and Raqqa (Syria), which is not so simple.

Regarding these artillery pieces deployed in Iraq, their type was not specified. It may be towed 155mm guns Tr F1, propelled guns AMX AuF F1 (this model has the advantage of having been commissioned in the Iraqi forces in the 1980s) or Trucks equipped with an artillery system (CAESAR), 5 of which copies were sent to the 5th Cuirassiers Regiment, located in the UAE.

However, this deployment guns assumes the establishment of a support chain ground-floor, with forward observers, fires coordination officers, heads of parts, servers, the maintenance personnel, logisticians and a "protection" force.

The Joint Centre of concepts, doctrines and experiments explains in its publication PIA-3.2.4.1_DLOC (2015) No. 103 / DEF / CICDE / NP 08 June 2015, that "very mobile, the barrel can achieve live shot (comparable to that of a battle tank), the dipping shot or vertical shot. "

Furthermore, the same document states that a gun also requires "more constraints in 3edimension, particularly in the context of vertical shooting long range for which the boom can reach 19,456 meters," which leads to "more complex and / or require more time to reach safety before a firing ground-ground, mobile [aircraft, note] playing in the third dimension of the action area ".

Finally, when the minister says the guns are close to the front line, it is not a figment of the imagination. The publication of CICDE recalls that "guns available today within the French forces have a range of up to 38 km."

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Jura, you look for Aleppo, i look for Mosul LOL

...
joking aside, I'll repeat here the conjecture I read in Russian Internet ... at that point you may skip the rest of this post ... according to that conjecture, Iraq have already amassed 150 thousand Fighters (Army, and also Thugs from
May 29, 2016

... and of course nobody believes me ...
Special Report: Massacre reports show U.S. inability to curb Iraq militias just link now, you may consider whether to read the content:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
) around Mosul, but the attack will take place later so that Mosul "happened" to be taken shortly before the US Presidential Elections ... time will tell
 
I noticed through Russian Internet (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
) Obama administration says deal with Russia over Syria at make-or-break moment
The Obama administration has told Russia that it is at the end of its patience in trying to arrange a cease-fire in Syria, along with proposed joint U.S.-Russia counterterrorism operations, and that it expects a decision from Moscow in the next several days.

A final proposal was given to the Russians as President Obama met with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Monday in China, senior administration officials said.

The Russian Foreign Ministry announced that Secretary of State John F. Kerry would meet with his Russian counterpart, Sergei Lavrov, in Geneva on Thursday and Friday. The State Department, while acknowledging that the two spoke by telephone Wednesday morning, declined to confirm the meeting.

“We’re not going to take a deal that doesn’t meet our basic objectives,” Benjamin Rhodes, Obama’s deputy national security adviser, said Tuesday during the president’s stop in Laos. “And I think we’ll know very quickly whether or not we can close those remaining gaps.”

In declining to confirm the Kerry-Lavrov meeting, U.S. officials made clear that they saw no purpose in yet another negotiating session if Russia had not changed its position. In a related development, the Russian Foreign Ministry said Lavrov had expressed “indignation” to Kerry in their telephone call over the U.S. announcement of additional Ukraine-related sanctions against Russia this week.

“It was underlined that the normal cooperation, including resolving regional conflicts, cooperation for which the administration of Barack Obama regularly asks in working contacts, is impossible without basic decency,” a ministry statement said.

The proposal calls for a cease-fire in civil-war fighting throughout the country, including in and around the besieged city of Aleppo, and the safe, sustained delivery of humanitarian assistance. Once the truce is in place for a specified time period, the Syrian air force is to be officially grounded. Then the United States and Russia are to initiate a joint air campaign against counterterrorism targets.

The outlines of the deal were agreed upon weeks ago, but U.S. officials have accused Russia of backtracking on some elements, including the timing and duration of a cease-fire before the other aspects of the agreement begin.

During the Obama-Putin meeting, and sessions between Kerry and Lavrov, held on the margins of the Group of 20 meeting in Hangzhou, China, “the Russians said, ‘Well, we want to go back and talk about some of the things at the previous meeting.’ We said that’s not something we’re willing to do. We’re not going to go backward,” said a senior administration official, speaking on the condition of anonymity about the closed-door sessions.

“Aleppo is a big part of the conversation,” the official said. “But we’re trying to look holistically at the crisis writ large, because many other communities are suffering.

“We are looking for a sustained period of calm,” the official added. “Because the conversation has gone on so long, and because there have been promises made, and promises not kept, we are looking to have a series of steps that get us to a comprehensive approach. . . . This is not just going to be another short-term truce.”

Administration officials declined to specify what steps they would take if the Russia deal does not go through. Stating that the fight against the Islamic State in Syria and Iraq is his first priority, Obama has been reluctant to directly involve the U.S. military in Syria’s civil war, beyond providing limited arms and other assistance to moderate opposition forces.

Those forces, and other rebel groups being aided by Saudi Arabia, Turkey and others in the immediate neighborhood, overlap in places, including in and around Aleppo, with fighters of the Front for the Conquest of Syria — or Jabhat Fatah al-Sham, the group formerly known as Jabhat al-
Nusra, which recently
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. The administration still considers the group an al-Qaeda affiliate.

Russia and Syria have been bombing the opposition, insisting that they are targeting the Front and that the United States is responsible for separating the groups. As part of the U.S.-
proposed deal, the administration says it will try to separate them. In the meantime, U.S. and Russian military and intelligence officials have mapped out much of northwestern Syria to demarcate areas of rebel control, mixed rebel and Front forces, and predominantly Front forces.

Under the coordination proposal, U.S. and Russian forces would agree on eligible Front targets and determine whose aircraft are best positioned to strike them.

Both the mapping and the cease-fire have become more difficult in recent days as the government on Sunday — with help from Russian air attacks — seized control of the last rebel supply line, southwest of Aleppo, cutting one of the main access roads that was to have been used for aid delivery.

In an indication that the government and its backers plan to continue fighting, pro-government media outlets reported Wednesday that the head of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps’ elite Quds Force, Maj. Gen. Qasem Soleimani, visited Syrian army and militia formations around Aleppo to prepare for a major offensive to retake the opposition-held portion of the city.

In a letter sent last weekend, Michael Ratney, the State Department’s liaison to the opposition, spelled out the proposed cease-fire steps. The proposal calls initially for a “complete cessation of military operations by the regime and its affiliated forces and opposition forces on the Ramusa road” in southwest Aleppo, and entry by U.N. aid convoys.

Second, checkpoints are to be set up on Castello Road, the main northern entryway to the city that government forces seized from the rebels last month. The government is then to withdraw all of its vehicles and heavy weapons to more than a mile away from Castello Road, which will be declared a “demilitarized zone.” Similar withdrawals and checkpoints are then to be established in the south.

“If the cease-fire extends to 7 days and the checkpoints are set up and all forces are withdrawn,” the letter said, “then the U.S. and Russia will work on stopping the regime planes from flying and will work together to weaken al-Qaeda in Syria.”

Commitment to the cease-fire, it said, “will open the door for the political process” to continue in Geneva, where talks between the government and the opposition fell apart last spring as a previous cease-fire collapsed.

On Wednesday, the opposition’s political leadership released its vision for a future Syria. At a news conference in London, opposition leaders presented a road map for a transition away from President Bashar al-Assad’s rule that broadly coincides with proposals made in the past by the United States and other Western allies for a negotiated solution to the war.

It envisions a six-month negotiation process, followed by an 18-month period during which Syria would be ruled by a transitional governing body that would be representative of all Syrians. That body would oversee the drafting of a new constitution, resulting in U.N.-supervised elections.

But without a wider diplomatic agreement between the United States and Russia on ways to end the fighting, a return to political negotiations is unlikely. And even if they do agree, it is far from likely that representatives of the regime would agree to negotiate their own government’s demise.
source, dated September 7 at 6:01 PM, is
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Monday at 8:07 PM
Today at 7:34 AM

now found this great map:
n6t2st2q1l9z0w6zg.jpg

(upon clicking, shows also "English" names of villages; it's
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
)​

credit goes to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(no idea what account it is, I just like the map)
an update, from yesterday, pro-Government source:
a31s7bwzdd4nr5qzg.jpg

(it's
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
)
EDIT I'm posting this because I've read Turkey declared the area north to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
"a military zone" (not an exact quote, of course; the point is reportedly the Turks are going to establish "the buffer" from Al-Bab (once it's taken) up to their border; I lost the link though)
 
Last edited:

delft

Brigadier
Quoted from WaPo, #4247:
“We’re not going to take a deal that doesn’t meet our basic objectives,” Benjamin Rhodes, Obama’s deputy national security adviser, said Tuesday during the president’s stop in Laos.
which means the removal of President Assad without elections?
After all how many Syrians would vote for a terrorist leader when the alternative is President Assad?
 

SampanViking

The Capitalist
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Quoted from WaPo, #4247:

which means the removal of President Assad without elections?
After all how many Syrians would vote for a terrorist leader when the alternative is President Assad?

Well we did have Carter Ash on BBC Radio 4 this morning, telling us how the US and Turkey were going to work together to capture Raqqa before the end of the Obama Presidency.
Put together with the Saudi backed HGC plan for transition yesterday, it seems that wishful thinking is the new policy method of the opposition.

Back in the real world, the SAA have recaptured Ramouseh and can now reopen the Southern supply route.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top