F-35 Joint Strike Fighter News, Videos and pics Thread

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
We can't going in détails so difficult many parameters with A2A combat many things in addition by writing and in English ... :( better but no perfect :)

Idealy only way charts, graphics as can provide Master Brumby but absent !

Just a point for IRST not new have begin in 1970's mainly Soviet with Mig-29, Su-27 also F-14
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


But surely a clearly inferior range to this time.

IIRC right now only F-35 get an IRST with 360° vision capabilities
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
to save the day for F-35 :) you pulled
Issue 6/2008
of some Austrian source, so let me add two things (and for now I'll it at that):
  1. "Suffice it to say that IR sensor design cycles will certainly - outpace - stealth airframes." and
  2. "Conceptually one can act on a - 'False-Positive' - even if stealth is 100% effective in the radio spectrum:
The Problem with the argument just made is it reaches in to Infrared Astronomy. Infared Astronomy is looking for a target at max sensitivity. It's looking for the back ground images and using a very large aperture set into the ground and using a very long shutter time. You don't have those on a fast moving fast turning fighter and if you did try to use the same Astronomy based settings they would be blinded by the IR of a jet. It's like the Stars on the moon in the Apollo Landing. The Stars were there but the light settings needed to see them would have not allowed you to see the Astronaughts.
In the Videos posted of IR F22 and F35 the contrast was cranked to the max. In Some cases the settings caused the Jet to almost disapear as they highlighted the Exhause well in others It glew but in all these images the fighters were close at most a few Km from the Fighter, Far closer then a Flanker would be if it was flying intercept.
The next issue with your argument is you failed to consider the radar advantages form the other side. A non stealth is going to be visible to a stealth well in advance and F35 has a Distributed aperture system that gives all around coverage.
So
a) IRST picks something up.
b) Point your radar at it.
c) No (or strange) radar return? = stealth.
d) We don't have stealth.
e) Select R-27T-R-77 class IR weapon - 'Fox!’ "
Would happen well after
A) F35 Radar detects Flanker
B) Master Arm select Meteor or AIM 120C/D
C) Fox 3.
D) Missile kills Flanker who is tying to fire.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Nice! F-35 Lightning II version 3.0 Beta Test August 14, 2016.

maxresdefault.jpg

In the mean time, did you know that three years ago F-35B short takeoff/vertical landing (STOVL) BF-1 aircraft completed the "Bravo" variant's 500th vertical landing August 3, 2013?

My how time flies...and so does the F-35!

BF-1, the aircraft which completed the 500th vertical take off, also accomplished the variant’s very first vertical landing in March 2010 at Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Md.

Good stuff!

f35_500vls__main.jpg
 
"F-35C Sea Trials

Next week, the F-35C begins testing aboard the USS George
Washington for its third at-sea period. There are seven
F-35Cs catching the wire next week, making this the largest
contingent of F-35Cs to operate aboard a CVN. The plan is to
continue envelope expansion testing with two F-35Cs from
NAS Patuxent River, Maryland, and five from the VFA-101
Grim Reapers, based at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida. During
these trials, the Grim Reapers will accomplish the first-ever
squadron-pilot carrier qualifications of 12 F-35C U.S. Navy
pilots. We have a team on board set to capture all of the
action as it happens. You can follow along next week at
F35.com."

according to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
F-35C-carrier-takeoff-777x437.png

nobody posted it yet?
from the vid inside of
VIDEO: F-35Cs Launch from Carrier in Final Testing
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
minutes ago noted "The pilots are checking out the third generation helmets to ensure the brightness of the symbology displayed does not interfere with their ability to see the carrier as they land at night — they are waiting for moonless nights before doing the tests." in
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

now found more:
Pilots to Test Fix for F-35 Helmet ‘Green Glow’ Problem
In coming days, five test pilots here will begin conducting night trials with a new software load for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter helmet that they believe will spell the end to a troubling issue.

Adjustments that decrease the contrast of the Generation III helmet-mounted display should allow pilots of the F-35C to land on aircraft carriers without having their view obscured by the display’s ambient light, said Tom Briggs, acting chief test engineer for the Navy.

The service tried out a different fix on its last round of carrier tests aboard the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower in 2015, but test pilots ultimately concluded they hadn’t completely solved the issue.

“You could describe it as looking through a dirty window,” Briggs said. “It’s not so bad on a really bright night. On a dark night it skewers outside light references for pilots. A pilot cannot pick up the lights on the carrier as well as he’d like to, he doesn’t necessarily pick up non-lighted signals on the ship as he’s taxiing around, he has a harder time picking out aircraft that are flying around.”

At $400,000 apiece, the F-35’s helmet is as high-tech as the aircraft itself, with display features that let pilots “see” through the plane’s skin and receive constantly updated information on the visor. The “green glow” problem with this visor display obscuring the field beyond it in dark conditions was first reported in 2012.

Briggs said two pilots had reported good results in an initial test with the new helmet update and officials were hopeful they have found the right solution. It’s especially crucial that this round of fixes works because the Navy is
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
for operational pilots as well as test pilots on the F-35C, and they won’t be able to complete night qualifications until the problem is resolved.

Capt. James Christie, commanding officer of Strike Fighter Squadron-101, which had 12 pilot-instructors complete daytime carrier qualifications on the F-35C this week, said he hoped software updates would be approved and close to being retrofitted to all F-35 helmets by the end of the year.

Christie said the decreased contrast setting is likely to help all pilots who operate in especially dark environments, without aid from the ‘cultural light’ of nearby cities. But on carriers out in the middle of the ocean, it was crucial.

“I think we just kind of stomped our feet and said, ”we need to have this to be safe around the ship,'” he said.

Briggs said nighttime helmet tests were expected to kick off Aug. 20, during the darkest phase of the moon.

“So we’re going to go out on a really dark night and we’re going to do our final evaluation on the green glow,” he said. “And we think that that problem is solved.”

The third and final round of carrier tests for the F-35C will continue until Aug. 23. The aircraft, which will be used by both the Navy and the Marine Corps for carrier operations, is expected to reach initial operational capability near the end of 2018.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top