US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

[FORBIN]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[Blackstone]

That relates strategic missiles it is not the problem for it, THAAD is unable to intercept it and 2/ Chinese are based in the interior or SSBN to Hainan, so far.
And in general SSBN are the more specialised platforms for 2nd Strike

Right now only GBI can intercept strategic missiles.

But, can THAAD someday be upgraded to intercept land-based ballistic missiles? An even bigger issue is Chinese leaders believe THAAD is or can be a threat to PRC nuclear deterrence, and no amount of US assurance thus far has remove their doubts. So, the question is, what kind of actions do nervous and fearful people usually take?

 

[FORBIN]

Navy 30-Year Ship Plan Outlines SSBN Incremental Funding, Pushes Cruiser Phased Modernization

The Navy released its

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

to supplement the Fiscal Year 2017 budget request, which continues the service’s request to put its remaining cruisers into a phased modernization plan and notes the requirement for 52 small surface combatants despite Defense Secretary Ash Carter curtailing the program at 40 Littoral Combat Ships and frigates.

The plan incorporates the many changes Congress has made to the Navy’s shipbuilding profile, in some cases to bump up procurement to get ahead of funding challenge in the 2020s due to the Ohio Replacement Program ballistic missile submarine. The shipbuilding plan reflects Congress’s intent to speed up production of the next Expeditionary Sea Base (ESB), formerly called the Afloat Forward Staging Base, for which lawmakers added money in the FY 2016 spending plan. And the shipbuilding plan acknowledges that lawmakers provided $1 billion for an additional Arleigh Burke-class destroyer, though the actual ship procurement charts were not updated to reflect the possible additional ship because “there are insufficient resources available to complete that ship” at this time.

The 30-year plan also outlines exactly how the Navy will pay for the every-other-generation SSBNs, which serve as the nation’s sea-based nuclear deterrent. The lead ship will be paid for incrementally over three years: 41 percent in FY 2021, 35 percent in FY 2022 and 24 percent in FY 2023. The second ship will be paid for in both FY 2024 and 2025, and beginning in FY 2026 the Navy will buy one boat a year.

The shipbuilding plan still advocates a phased modernization plan for the cruiser fleet despite vehement opposition from lawmakers. The document notes that the first four ships are being inducted into Congress’s preferred modernization plan, which keeps the ships out of service for a much shorter time, compared to the Navy’s proposal to put the non-modernized cruisers into a reduced readiness state and modernize them as older cruisers approach decommissioning. The document notes the Navy supports putting the final seven non-modernized cruisers into its preferred modernization program, which will ensure enough cruisers to fill the air defense commander role in a carrier strike group through FY 2042 “and will maintain a greater number of operational large surface combatants in the latter part of the 2020s and early 2030s as the DDG-51s begin to retire.”

Overall, though Navy Secretary Ray Mabus and others talk about the Navy meeting its stated goal of a 308-ship fleet by 2021, the document notes that “the shipbuilding plan described in this report achieves the shipbuilding plan objective of 308 battle force ships from FY2021 through FY2028, albeit not with the (Force Structure Assessment) required mix of ships. The rate of large and small surface combatant and SSN (attack submarine) retirements beyond FY2028 exceeds the ability of the Navy to finance a build rate that sustains the 308 ship force structure. As a result, Navy force structure declines below 300 ships in FY2031 and remains below hat force level for the remainder of the 30 year period.”

At these lower force structure levels, the Navy will be able to meet the highest priorities laid out in the Defense Strategic Guidance, the report notes, but will take risk in the ability to fill lower-priority missions, such as presence missions outside of areas of conflict.

Everything within the report is subject to change, though. Navy leadership made clear this year that its force structure assessment – completed in 2012, with an update in 2014 – is no longer relevant given new threats that continue to arise. The Navy is conducting a new FSA that will inform the FY 2018 budget submission to Congress and will outline new requirements for attack submarines, small surface combatants and other ship types.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Navy’s 30-Year Shipbuilding Plan to Congress for Fiscal Year 2017

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

2015

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The more interesting Table for decommissioning page 12 mainly Los Angeles a schedule different ships for 2021 now and 2 first Ticonderoga for 2020, 1 Kaiser in 2020, 2021, 4 MS Avenger whose 3 in 2021 in mote the Ponce for 2018.

Los Angeles
- 2017 : 3 before planned 4
- 2018 : 1, 0
- 2019 : 2, 2 whose first 688 Fl II
- 2020 : 3 before 2
- 2021 : 3 whose first 688i

But for surface combattants for 2021 a big increase from 84 now + about 12 Burke, 3 Zumwalt less 2 Ticonderoga : 97 !

 

[FORBIN]

It is him

Video Purports to Show US Stealth Drone Flying in Nevada

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Welcome to the world of the deep
Video !

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[FORBIN]

Ouf the do the job ! a little laborious USAF very Lucky if she get the first Sqn in 2018

Pegasus refuels Globemaster

The KC-46A Pegasus connected in flight with an F-16 Fighting Falcon on July 8 and a C-17 Globemaster III on July 12.

These tests with the F-16 and C-17 were in support of the Milestone C requirements to rendezvous, contact, and transfer fuel to several receiver aircraft types.

An initial attempt with the F-16 earlier this year was successful, however higher-than-expected axial loads on the boom were detected. These loads were again present during the initial attempt with the C-17 and necessitated installation of hydraulic pressure relief valves in the boom.

This week's successful tests show the boom axial loads hardware fix, designed by Boeing engineers, is performing as expected to alleviate the loads.

"I'm encouraged by these results. The KC-46 program continues to move forward, making important progress that will get this vital capability into the hands of the warfighter," said Deborah James, Secretary of the Air Force.

The final Milestone C flight test is to transfer fuel through the fixed boom to an A-10 Thunderbolt. That test is also slated to occur this month.

"Once complete with the A-10, we will request approval from Mr. Frank Kendall, Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics, to award production Lots 1 and 2, totaling 19 KC-46A aircraft," according to Darlene Costello, Air Force Service Acquisition Executive.

"While it took some time, this week's results confirm my confidence the Boeing team will get this figured out. It's reassuring to see the program take this important step toward the production decision in August," said Gen. Dave Goldfein, Chief of Staff.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[FORBIN]

Improved Avenger

 

[bd popeye]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Release Date: 7/14/2016
From Chief of Naval Operations Public Affairs
WASHINGTON (NNS) -- Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) Adm. John Richardson is scheduled to visit China, July 17 to 20, to meet with People's Liberation Army (Navy) (PLA(N)) commander Adm. Wu Shengli.

The goal of the three-day visit to Beijing and Qingdao is to improve mutual understanding and encourage professional interaction between the two navies.

This is Richardson's first visit to China as CNO and will be the first in-person meeting for the two leaders. Over the last year, the two admirals have held three discussions via video teleconference.

Discussion topics include the South China Sea; the ongoing Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercise; and future opportunities for the two navies to operate together.

"I have been looking forward to this trip and to meeting Admiral Wu for some time," said Richardson. "These are important times for our two navies and for maritime forces throughout the region. As we seek to learn from each other, there is no substitute for these types of face-to-face meetings."

While in Beijing, Richardson is scheduled to visit PLA(N) headquarters and meet with other senior Chinese defense officials. In Qingdao, home of the Chinese North Sea Fleet, he is scheduled to visit the Chinese Navy's submarine academy and tour the aircraft carrier Liaoning (CV-16).

For more information, visit

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

,

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

, or

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

.

For more news from Chief of Naval Operations, visit

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

.

 

[Air Force Brat]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Very nice, and these one on one meetings between men of honorable intent are far more productive than flinging insults and innuendo, I hope they have a great meeting, like and respect one another, and go back and encourage the "boss" to do the same in each of our great countries.

 

[FORBIN]

USN Amphibious Groups
Last updated 21 Jun 2016

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(LHD 1),

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(LPD 17),

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(LSD 41) 22nd MEU

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(LHD 2),

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(LPD 23),

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(LSD 47) 15th MEU

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(LHD 3),

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(LPD 24),

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(LSD 51), 26th MEU

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(LHD 4),

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(LPD 18),

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(LSD 49) 31st MEU

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(LHD 5),

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(LPD 19),

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(LSD 44) TBA MEU

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(LHD 6),

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(LPD 20),

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(LSD 42),

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(LSD 48) TBA MEU

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(LHD 7),

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(LPD 21),

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(LSD 43) 24th MEU

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(LHD 8),

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(LPD 25),

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(LSD 45), 11th MEU

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(LHA 6) First deployment 2017 WESTPAC with three DDGs

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

USN Carrier Strike Groups
Last updated 01 July 2016

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

CVN 68 In overhaul

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

CVN 69

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

CG 61

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

CG 56

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

DDG 80

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

DDG 55

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

DDG 87

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

94 6th Fleet

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

CVN 70 WESTPAC 2017

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

CVN 71 San Diego

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

CVN 72 RCOH

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

CVN 73 Flight Training

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

CVN 74

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

CG 53

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

CG 54

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

DDG 93

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

DDG 106 William P Lawrence DDG 110 RIMPAC 2016

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

CVN 75 Anzio CG 68 Bulkeley DDG 84 Graveley DDG 107

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

DDG 66

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

DDG 61 6th Fleet

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

CVN 76 7th Fleet

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

CVN 77 In overhaul
USS Philippine Sea CG 58 USS Hue City CG 66 USS Truxtun DDG 103 USS Mahan DDG 72 USS Cole DDG 67 USS Laboon DDG 58

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

CVN 78 Fitting Out

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[Jura The idiot]

Jul 6, 2016

I noticed through Defensetech.org
Military Firms Want to ‘Grow’ Drones from Chemicals

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

and this ... story indeed comes from

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

and contains particularly funny part "This unique UK technology could use environmentally sustainable materials ..." so those drones will also be Green LOL!

Lifting the lid on future military aircraft technologies

dated 3 July 2016, it's

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

now DefenseNews picked this up:
Defense Firm Banks on 'Chemputer' to Spit Out Aircraft Parts

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

incredible:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

EDIT

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!