Shenyang FC-31 / J-31 Fighter Demonstrator

Daniel707

Junior Member
Registered Member
agkrl97-jpg.25587


an F-35 style single piece extra-large
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
anoramic Cockpit Display (PCD) :)
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
Let's take a step back on J-31 and ask why other than one single demo model, we've seen no other visible activities? Is it because there's less than meets the eye?

Simple. Money.

The J31 is a private venture by SAC, after it lost the PLAAF next gen competition to CAC.

All the Chinese government resources went to CAC to finance the development of the J20 in the wake of that decision.

SAC are effectively on their own in this, and 5th gens are notoriously expensive to develop and build.

I think they are stuck in a catch 22 trap.

SAC doesn't have the financial power to fully fund the development of the J31 on it's own, no single company does. It needs investors to jump in with money to keep the programme running, but no one looks remotely ready to jump in and help fund the programme since they know its stuck.

I think SAC was banking on getting the same reaction as Sukhoi with the PAKFA. Get a prototype in the air, generate enough international interest that a client signs on straight away with enough financial commitment to get the programme moving, after which point it will generate enough momentum and further commitments to become self sufficient and viable.

Problem is that SAC isn't Sukhoi. Not only does it lack the history and brand of Sukhoi, it also doesn't have an internationally marketable product.

Sukhoi funded the PAKFA on the back of hundreds of Flankers sold world wide, as well as directly contributions from the Russian government, and then India.

I think SAC is bound by Chinese government agreements with Russia to not sell any of the Flanker variants it produces.

While it did sell hundreds of Flankers to the PLA, it cannot expect anything like the profit margins from those sales as Sukhoi could from international exports.

SAC also doesn't have much, if any, financial contribution from the Chinese government or international customer.

They pretty much spent all their retained profits from its decades of Flanker sales to the PLA on the first prototype (many they have enough for a second, but almost certainly not enough for more than that), and now just doesn't have the income and operating profit margins to fund it at anything like a normal pace.

They are probably piggy backing its development on other projects, since it cannot afford to fund a dedicated team. That's going to massively slow things down, since the teams will need to deliver on the programmes that are actually paying the bills as their first priority. So the J31, at this stage, is very much like an after hours hobby for SAC.
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Simple. Money.

The J31 is a private venture by SAC, after it lost the PLAAF next gen competition to CAC.

All the Chinese government resources went to CAC to finance the development of the J20 in the wake of that decision.

SAC are effectively on their own in this, and 5th gens are notoriously expensive to develop and build.

I think they are stuck in a catch 22 trap.

SAC doesn't have the financial power to fully fund the development of the J31 on it's own, no single company does. It needs investors to jump in with money to keep the programme running, but no one looks remotely ready to jump in and help fund the programme since they know its stuck.

I think SAC was banking on getting the same reaction as Sukhoi with the PAKFA. Get a prototype in the air, generate enough international interest that a client signs on straight away with enough financial commitment to get the programme moving, after which point it will generate enough momentum and further commitments to become self sufficient and viable.

Problem is that SAC isn't Sukhoi. Not only does it lack the history and brand of Sukhoi, it also doesn't have an internationally marketable product.

Sukhoi funded the PAKFA on the back of hundreds of Flankers sold world wide, as well as directly contributions from the Russian government, and then India.

I think SAC is bound by Chinese government agreements with Russia to not sell any of the Flanker variants it produces.

While it did sell hundreds of Flankers to the PLA, it cannot expect anything like the profit margins from those sales as Sukhoi could from international exports.

SAC also doesn't have much, if any, financial contribution from the Chinese government or international customer.

They pretty much spent all their retained profits from its decades of Flanker sales to the PLA on the first prototype (many they have enough for a second, but almost certainly not enough for more than that), and now just doesn't have the income and operating profit margins to fund it at anything like a normal pace.

They are probably piggy backing its development on other projects, since it cannot afford to fund a dedicated team. That's going to massively slow things down, since the teams will need to deliver on the programmes that are actually paying the bills as their first priority. So the J31, at this stage, is very much like an after hours hobby for SAC.

FC-31 has received PLAAF funding. Numerous big shrimps have said this on Chinese forums. There are many reasons why it would take a couple of years to go from a demonstrator to a prototype. It took over 3 years to go from 2001 to 2011 and CAC had higher priority with J-20. FC-31's first real prototype is expected this year (which is about 3 to 4 years after 31001 had its first flight). Seems to be pretty reasonable progress to me.
 

kwaigonegin

Colonel
FC-31 has received PLAAF funding. Numerous big shrimps have said this on Chinese forums. There are many reasons why it would take a couple of years to go from a demonstrator to a prototype. It took over 3 years to go from 2001 to 2011 and CAC had higher priority with J-20. FC-31's first real prototype is expected this year (which is about 3 to 4 years after 31001 had its first flight). Seems to be pretty reasonable progress to me.

That is a big step forward. I guess the ? remains on how much funding are we talking about? Is PRC/PLAAF tottally committed to this bird all the way through to actual production or are they funding development cost on a limited basis just to keep it alive?
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
That is a big step forward. I guess the ? remains on how much funding are we talking about? Is PRC/PLAAF tottally committed to this bird all the way through to actual production or are they funding development cost on a limited basis just to keep it alive?
I remember reading that PLAAF providing R&D funding to SAC even after they lost the original competition. Obviously, PLAAF will only provide continued funding for the project if they are happy with what SAC comes up with. And once SAC does get official PLAAF designation, then we know that would've happened.
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
FC-31 has received PLAAF funding. Numerous big shrimps have said this on Chinese forums. There are many reasons why it would take a couple of years to go from a demonstrator to a prototype. It took over 3 years to go from 2001 to 2011 and CAC had higher priority with J-20. FC-31's first real prototype is expected this year (which is about 3 to 4 years after 31001 had its first flight). Seems to be pretty reasonable progress to me.

Thanks for the info. Any indication on how much funding they received from the PLAAF? Was it a meaningful amount, or more a token political concession to keep them in business and prevent CAC from becoming the LockMart of China?
 
Top