US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Brumby

Major
Yes...but your wording "only 3 currently are fully Aegis BMD capable" implied that the others were less BMD capable...and this is not the case.
I agree if my comments were read in isolation except it was made in reference to the article and so for context it should be read in conjunction with the article. Specifically the term "Fully Aegis BMD" is coined in the article which I just adopted as per article and its meaning is self explanatory if article is read in entirety.

Those with Baseline 7 AEGIS capabilities are in fact pretty much fully BMD capable.

These earlier baselines will also allow those vessels to engage multiple threat types. Simultaneous is a fairly subjective term when you are dealing with a system that can be set to automatically engage. Earlier baselines do not lock AEGIS out of other types of engagements...they just get queued up according to threat.

It is my understanding when reading this article and others that discussed the subject of Baseline 9 is that only at this level can the Aegis system engage multiple type targets simultaneously i.e. concurrently. When you mentioned that earlier baseline can engage multiple type targets by queuing it would imply to me that it is not simultaneous but rather sequentially. I don't know at a practical level how much difference it makes between sequentially and concurrently when a threat is a ballistic missile. I can also understand the inflight window between launch and contact can result in multiple launches against a range of targets and targeting during the inflight window between sequential and concurrent launch may become moot. More importantly it is my understanding that prior to baseline 9, the configuration to handle BMD and cruise missiles are not easily interchangeable on the fly as opposed to it being software driven in Baseline 9. In other words, its capability is preconfigured and cannot be easily changed during an engagement. Your statement seems to imply it is merely system queuing. Can you please clarify if you know.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Future-USS-Jackson-Completes-Acceptance-Trials.jpg

Naval Today said:
Austal announced that Littoral Combat Ship 6 (LCS 6), the future USS Jackson, has successfully completed US Navy acceptance trials.

The trials, the last significant milestone before delivery, were undertaken in the Gulf of Mexico and involved comprehensive testing of the vessel’s major systems and equipment by the US Navy.

After delivery of LCS 6, Austal will deliver a further nine Littoral Combat Ships from its shipyard at Mobile, Alabama, under a 10-ship, US$3.5 billion block-buy contract from the US Navy.

Of those, Montgomery (LCS 8) is preparing for trials and delivery later this year. Gabrielle Giffords (LCS 10) was recently christened. Final assembly is well underway on Omaha (LCS 12) and Manchester (LCS 14). Modules for Tulsa (LCS 16) and Charleston (LCS 18) are under construction in Austal’s module manufacturing facility.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


cyclone-05-jpg.14699

Naval Today said:
Five coastal patrol ships (PC) of the US Navy that have been outfitted with the Griffin Missile System (GMS) conducted a test and proficiency fire June 26-28.

The patrol coastal ship USS Monsoon (PC 4) conducted the test fire while USS Typhoon (PC 5), USS Firebolt (PC 10), USS Sirocco (PC 6) and USS Whirlwind (PC 11) conducted a proficiency fire.

Guided missiles like the GMS enhance the engagement capability of the PCs and will be integrated with existing crew-served weapons allowing the PCs to enhance their capability to defend themselves against small boat threats.

Adapted from aviation and special operations platforms, the GMS consists of a designed launcher and weapons control system, BRITE Star II forward looking infrared (FLIR) sensor/laser designator, and Raytheon’s Griffin B (Block II) missile.

The remaining five PCs in Bahrain are scheduled to receive the GMS by October 2015.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Science | Wed Jul 1, 2015 6:01pm EDT
Related:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Air Force says rocket accident won’t bump SpaceX from competition
CAPE CANAVERAL, FLA./WASHINGTON | BY IRENE KLOTZ AND
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
r

An unmanned Space Exploration Technologies Falcon 9 rocket launches in Cape Canaveral, Florida, June 28, 2015.
REUTERS/MICHAEL BERRIGAN

SpaceX can compete to launch a U.S. Global Positioning System satellite despite a Falcon 9 rocket accident this weekend, the Air Force said on Wednesday.

“SpaceX remains certified and can compete for the upcoming GPS III launch service,” Lt. General Samuel Greaves, who heads the Air Force’s Space and Missile Systems Center, wrote in an email to Reuters.

The Air Force plans to release a solicitation for launch service proposals this month, the first time SpaceX, which is owned and operated by technology entrepreneur Elon Musk, will be eligible to compete against United Launch Alliance (ULA). The joint-venture of Lockheed-Martin and Boeing has had a monopoly on the military’s launch business.

In May, SpaceX won a hard-fought, two-year battle to have its Falcon 9 rocket certified to fly military and national security satellites. On Sunday, one of those rockets exploded after liftoff.

The cause of the accident, which claimed a cargo ship heading to the International Space Station for NASA and was the first Falcon 9 launch failure in 19 flights, is under investigation.

While not directly involved in the mission, the Air Force said it has been invited to observe the accident investigation and has offered support.

SpaceX is leading the investigation, with support from NASA and the Federal Aviation Administration, which oversees commercial space launches in the United States.

Preliminary analysis indicates a problem with the liquid oxygen system of the rocket’s upper-stage engine.

SpaceX President Gwynne Shotwell told reporters after the accident that Falcon 9 launches would be suspended “a number of months, or so” pending the results of the investigation.

“We are working with our partners to prepare for potential delays on the order of a few months,” SpaceX wrote in an email to Reuters.

The rocket that blew up on Sunday was the third cargo ship lost in the past eight months. In October, an Orbital ATK Antares rocket exploded seconds after liftoff from Virginia. Orbital is buying new engines for the rocket and expects to return to flight next year.

In April, a Russian Progress capsule failed to separate properly from its Soyuz launcher, dooming the ship. Russia hopes to break the string of launch failures with liftoff of another Soyuz rocket and Progress capsule at 12:55 a.m. EDT/0455 GMT on Friday.



([email protected]; Editing by
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
)
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Allyn visits PEO Soldier, urges lightening Soldier load
June 25, 2015

By
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



size0.jpg

  • size0.jpg


  • size0.jpg


  • size0.jpg


FORT BELVOIR, Va. (June 24, 2015) -- Program Executive Office Soldier showed Army Vice Chief of Staff Gen. Daniel B. Allyn how it is providing Soldiers with more lethal weapons, better protective gear and more capable equipment while also looking for ways to lighten Soldier load during his visit there, June 23.

The general clearly expressed his desire to lighten the Soldier's load.

Program Executive Officer Soldier Brig. Gen. Brian P. Cummings, and his project and product managers briefed new programs and developments taking place. PEO Soldier is responsible for developing small arms, night-vision and thermal devices, uniforms, body armor, helmets, and other equipment Soldiers carry.

Soldier load is not a new problem but one that goes back for centuries. Soldiers today carry night-vision equipment, personal protective equipment and weapons that provide new capabilities but also add weight. General Cummings assured Allyn that PEO Soldier is focused on lightening Soldier load and also in getting their feedback on equipment in development.

PEO Soldier goes to where Soldiers are - at school houses or in the field around the world - to get their feedback on how to make weapons, equipment and gear even better and more effective.

Seeking Soldier feedback isn't the only way PEO Soldier strives to provide the best to Soldiers. Project Manager Soldier Warrior manages the Soldier Enhancement Program, or SEP. This program helps the Army move quickly to evaluate, test and type classify existing prototypes or commercially available items, which will enhance Soldiers' ability to execute their combat mission. More than 42 percent of the PEO Soldier portfolio originated within SEP.

Product managers briefed Allyn on several items PEO Soldier is working on to reduce Soldier load while increasing their effectiveness.

Lt. Col. Kathy M. Brown, product manager for Soldier Protective Equipment, or PM SPE, provided an example of how PEO Soldier is doing that. She let Allyn compare the advanced combat helmet with the new Generation II Lightweight Advanced Combat Helmet, or LW ACH. The LW ACH weighs a pound lighter while offering the same ballistic protection, a weight reduction the general appreciated.

In addition to the LW ACH, the PM SPE explained the weight savings and ballistic protection the Soldier Protection System, or SPS offers. SPS provides the Soldier with a modular, scalable integrated system of mission-tailorable ballistic protection at a reduced weight compared to the current PPE systems. In addition, SPS achieves the weight reduction without sacrificing the level of ballistic protection.

Lt. Col. Paul E. Alessio, product manager for crew served weapons at Project Manager Soldier Weapons, briefed the new precision sniper rifle. This highly-accurate rifle will enable Soldiers to use three different rounds depending upon mission requirements. The PSR could replace .50 caliber (M107) and .300 WinMag (M2010) sniper rifles. This one weapon will simplify and reduce the loads snipers carry.

Lt. Col. Terry S. Russell, product manager for individual weapons at PM SW, explained the XM17 Modular Handgun System and XM25 Counter Defilade Target Engagement System. The XM17 will provide Soldiers with greater accuracy, target acquisition and ergonomic design. It will also be more reliable, durable and easier to maintain.

The XM25 enables the small unit and individual Soldier to engage personnel targets in defilade - protected position - by providing a 25mm air-bursting capability in all operational environments. The XM25 is an individually-fired, semi-automatic, Soldier-portable weapon system. A Soldier, using basic rifle marksmanship skills, can effectively engage exposed or defilade personnel targets in just seconds out to 500 meters.

In terms of uniforms, Lt. Col. John T. Bryan, product manager for soldier clothing and individual equipment, briefed the Army's adoption of the Operational Camouflage Pattern, which will become available July 1. He said recruits will begin receiving the new pattern in January 2016.

Lt. Col. Timothy Fuller, product manager of Soldier maneuver sensors, briefed advanced night vision and sensors, such as Family of Weapon Sights-Individual, or FWS-I. FWS-I gives Soldiers the capability to see deep into the battlefield, increase surveillance and target acquisition range, and penetrate day or night obscurants.

An example of providing a product, which increases a Soldier's effectiveness, is the Tactical Communication and Protective System, or TCAPS.

Bill Brower, acting project manager SWAR briefed Allyn on this item. TCAPS provides concurrent hearing protection and auditory situational awareness. It maintains hearing protection while enabling Soldier to use existing tactical radio resulting in increased mission effectiveness, safety and survivability.

Meeting Soldiers' immediate needs was the theme of another briefing.

Col. Steven A. Sliwa, director of the Training and Doctrine Command Rapid Equipping Force, or REF, briefed how expeditionary labs, or Ex Labs, provide technical assistance to Soldiers. Ex Labs give Soldiers immediate access to scientists and engineers to discuss their operational problems. The Ex Lab staff is then able to quickly fabricate custom-made solutions on site.

Seeing how PEO Soldier and REF share the same concerns as Allyn on lightening Soldier load, and providing equipment and gear based on Soldier feedback impressed the general.

"I appreciate what you are focused on here, better kit and lighter weight," Allyn said.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Afghanistan has left a impression. Infantry packing over 100 pounds of kit is not sustainable. but some of these seem a stretch.

Lt. Col. Paul E. Alessio, product manager for crew served weapons at Project Manager Soldier Weapons, briefed the new precision sniper rifle. This highly-accurate rifle will enable Soldiers to use three different rounds depending upon mission requirements. The PSR could replace .50 caliber (M107) and .300 WinMag (M2010) sniper rifles. This one weapon will simplify and reduce the loads snipers carry.
Case in point. It is not realistic to build a Sniper rifle that fits .30 rounds but also .50 cal and is still light weight. I suspect the M107 will stick around but could be augmented by a modular sniper rifle compatable with 7.62,.300WM and .338 norma mag. there are already a number of systems that do this.
The XM25 enables the small unit and individual Soldier to engage personnel targets in defilade - protected position - by providing a 25mm air-bursting capability in all operational environments. The XM25 is an individually-fired, semi-automatic, Soldier-portable weapon system. A Soldier, using basic rifle marksmanship skills, can effectively engage exposed or defilade personnel targets in just seconds out to 500 meters.
Seems XM25 might not be ready for the coffin yet.
Lt. Col. Terry S. Russell, product manager for individual weapons at PM SW, explained the XM17 Modular Handgun System and XM25 Counter Defilade Target Engagement System. The XM17 will provide Soldiers with greater accuracy, target acquisition and ergonomic design. It will also be more reliable, durable and easier to maintain.
Before I hear a "Why Replace M9? If it aint broke Don't fix it..."
I can go to a gun shop and buy a pistol with a slightly longer barrel length, that performs just as well a larger magazine capacity and can mount not just lights and lasers but even a small red dot sight yet has a lighter empty weight.
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
The US Navy (USN) retired from service the last of its Grumman EA-6B Prowler electronic attack (EA) aircraft during a three-day 'sundown' ceremony at Naval Air Station (NAS) Whidbey Island in Washington state from 25 to 27 June.

The four-seat Prowler, which was developed from the twin-seat A-6 Intruder attack aircraft, first entered service with the US Navy in 1971. With the final unit (Electronic Attack Squadron [VAQ] 134) having now fully transitioned over the successor Boeing EA-18G Growler, the Prowler was withdrawn after nearly 45 years of operations.
Although a highly capable EA platform, the Prowler had for a long time been showing its age and a need for replacement.

With no real self-defence capability, the Prowler needed a fighter escort when operating in denied environments. With a relatively modest (for a jet) top speed of 556 kt, the Prowler could not keep up with the navy's modern crop of fighters, requiring them to slow down to a sub-optimum performance envelope, which is far from ideal when flying in enemy airspace.
This is not an issue for its successor, since it is based on the same F/A-18E/F Super Hornet airframe as the navy's current fleet defence fighter. As well, the Growler is capable of defending itself with air-to-air missiles and so does not need an escort in the first place.
While the transition from Prowler to Growler has largely seen the current capabilities cross-decked from one platform to the other, one issue that the navy had to deal with was the 50% reduction in the number of crew members needed. With only half as many crew members as the Prowler, one of the navy's biggest priorities was to redefine the different roles of the Growler's two-man crew. The pilot is no longer fully occupied with flying the aircraft, but instead spends much of his or her time operating the mission systems as well.
Whereas each crew station in the Prowler is fitted with specific kit for specific tasks, in the Growler both crew members have access to the full range of onboard mission systems. However, the specific systems tasked to each crew member largely depend on the mission being flown at that time.

As well as being more capable than its predecessor, the Growler is also easier to maintain, needing 1.6 man-hours of servicing per flight hour compared with 30 man-hours per flight hour for the Prowler.

At the height of its service, there were 170 Prowlers in the USN's inventory. These have been replaced by 114 Growlers.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


These have been replaced by 114 Growlers.
No with last Congress funding for 15, total 150.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Army aims for positive improvements with M4A1+
By Kyle Jahner, Staff writer10:45 a.m. EDT July 4, 2015
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

While the Army continues to upgrade existing M4s to the deadlier, more reliable M4A1, Army leaders have mapped out a whole new list of additional improvements to the legacy rifle.

The Army has requested from industry new enhancements to create what's called an M4A1+. The "plus" components would give the M4A1 an extended Picatinny rail, a floating barrel to enhance accuracy and an optional sniper-style single-stage trigger.

"We're always trying to modernize and upgrade the weapon to make sure we've got the best weapon available," said Lt. Col. Terry Russell, project manager for Individual Weapons at Picatinny Arsenal. "There are no deficiencies that we're trying to correct; we're just trying to make sure it remains a premier weapons system."

Earlier this year, the Army asked industry for examples of existing weapon upgrades that could be applied to the M4A1.

Russell said the desired enhancements should require more research and development for the M4A1, used by special operations since 1994.

"We are very confident that these already do exist, or that (companies) can develop them for us in short order," Russell said.

The solicitation stipulated that all of the components "seamlessly integrate with the current M4A1 Carbine," and "without negatively impacting or affecting the performance or operation."

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

Here are eight key components that would give your M4A1 that added "plus."

1. Shoot with a straight elbow: The requested forward Picatinny rail, according to the Army specs, would be 12 inches long. That makes it about four inches longer than the current standard, and with reason.

The M4 and M4A1 are designed to be held with a bent front elbow. But many soldiers utilize a technique in which they extend their arm and lock their elbow for better stability. That technique is a bad idea on current carbines because of a shorter rail, Russell said. For most shooters, extending the forward arm would put the hand past the end of the rail and require the shooter to hold the barrel instead — a good way to burn that hand.

2. Attach more gear: Along with hand placement, the longer rail would allow soldiers to attach more enablers to the weapon, such as laser sights and pointers, forward grips, bipods, optics and lights.

"Right now, there's limited space," Russell said. "This allows you to put more than you are currently able to put on them."

Russell said part of the reason for seeking enhanced mounting capacity comes with an eye toward the future: the Army's ongoing development of a rifle fire control system.

The Army remains a few years away from a working prototype that meets its requirements, Russell said. But eventually, the system will effectively adjust thecrosshairs in a scope to account for factors like distance, wind, humidity, barometric pressure, and ammunition characteristics. The longer rail of the M4A1+ will better facilitate the new tool, which Russell said the Army hopes will compare in size to today's optic systems.

3. Floating for accuracy: Encased in the new extended rail would be a floating barrel. In other words, the wrap-around rail would not touch the barrel.

A rifle's barrel vibrates naturally when it fires, and altering the harmonics on the barrel can impact accuracy. When a rail is attached to the middle of the barrel as it is now, forces exerted on the rail do just that as they are exerted on the barrel. Forces can include the rigidity of the rail itself, weight of enablers, the pull of a sling mounted to the rail, or a tight grip by the forward hand on the rail.

"A soldier holding it with a rigid grip can have an effect, and that causes some accuracy degradation," Russell said of an accessorized, non-floating barrel. "By having the floating barrel on there, it takes all those things out of the equation, which allows better accuracy."

4. Removable sights: The Army, Russell noted, wants to take weight off the soldier wherever it can. That's part of the reason the call to industry specifies removable front and rear iron sights.

That feature would also allow for lower-profile enablers (that don't stick out as much). That would make for a less-bulky accessorized rifle with a lower center of gravity. It also would reduce the silhouette signature, Russell said, making it harder to spot.

For soldiers who want the sights, there will still be a small, fold-down front and rear sight that can clip to the Picatinny rail, Russell said.

5. Better accuracy: In terms of system accuracy, the specs require a 5-inch mean radius from 300 meters, throughout barrel life. That means shots average no more than 5 inches from the target.

Additionally, the Army hopes the weapon can limit the extreme spread of 5 inches at that distance and 10 inches at 600 meters, with a 90 percent probability. That goal, listed as "desired" rather than "required," means 90 percent of shots fit into a circle 5 inches in diameter (a 2.5-inch radius) at 300 meters, and a circle twice as wide at 600.

6. Flash suppressor. The specs request an improved flash suppressor to reduce both day and night firing signatures. That new muzzle break, Russell said, should make a fired M4A1+ a little more difficult to see and hear.

The suppressor should, according to specs, include a blank firing adapter compatible with M200 ammunition. (The adapter is the muzzle-blocker used in blanks-based training to minimize injury should the gun accidentally fire a live round).

7. Optional sniper trigger: One modification won't go on every M4A1+, but the squad marksman will appreciate it.

A specialized trigger will offer sniper-like sensitivity, Russell said. Current carbines have double-stage triggers, with some slack to pull before the weapon fires. The specialized trigger module will be single-stage: the gun will fire basically once the trigger moves.

"It's very sensitive to the touch. When pulling the trigger you don't have to pull it as hard, which allows you to maintain accuracy on the target," Russell said. "At shorter distances it (the difference in accuracy) is not that significant, but at longer range, it becomes more significant."

Specs call for a "single-stage trigger, free of creep, with consistent trigger pull weight" of 4-5 pounds. It should work on both semiautomatic and automatic settings.

The trigger module would be procured separately, meaning a different company may produce it, rather than the one that supplies the rest of the upgrades.

8. Stealthier: To reduce visual detection, the Army wants the colors of the new parts to be "neutral (non-black) color" of a "rough, dull, non-reflective, coating/finish that retains paint." The request specifies a brownish color, one between Coyote 498 and Light Coyote 481.

Even more M4 improvements

In addition to the M4A1 and M4A1+, the service is weighing whether to pursue even more improvements via its Soldier Enhancement Program. SEP is designed to test off-the-shelf equipment that could improve a soldier's combat effectiveness. Many ofSEP's ideas come directly from soldiers themselves. Leaders of SEP are considering testing the following commercially available improvements for the M4 platform.

• A better tool to clean the bolt, carrier and firing pin.

• Picatinny attachments that could insulate soldiers' hands from heat and protect accessory wires so they don't get caught on anything.

• A heat resistant rubber, plastic shield or other polymer shield that can wrap around the pistol grip to insulate heat and optics to provide protection.

• An integrated arms system including advanced fire control technology, with target tracking, environmental sensors, automatic ballistic calculation, heads up display and networking.

• A hand-guard system that weighs 20 percent less and is thermally insulated.

• A device that slightly raises the rifle combat optic and moves it back, improving ease of use.

• A device that allows soldiers to zero their weapons (calibrate the sights so it accurately indicates where the bullet will hit) in any environment without life fire.

• An ambidextrous, lightweight, rugged sling-mount adapter. The socket attaching a carrying strap to the gun should be mountable to a Picatinny rail in seconds and easily adjusted for comfort.

• A device to fill the gap between the trigger guard and the pistol grip, one that cushions the knuckle and prevents finger abrasions.

Got an idea to improve the M4? Send your feedback to:[email protected]

" Optional sniper trigger: One modification won't go on every M4A1+, but the squad marksman will appreciate it."
Point here, I thought we had already moved away from modding service Rifles into DMR's it's a combat fail. If the Army Wants a DMR give them a based AR10 Carbine I can name 6 of the top of my head that would fit the bill, LMT Sopmod 762, KAC SR25, Kac M110K, LWRCI Reaper, Remington RSASS, HK 417. Some of these are in active use for the same role by Our Allies. In Iraq and Afganistan early on they tried the M16 DMR and what happened? They moved to M14 based DMR.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Northrop, USAF nearing deal for Global Hawk universal payload adaptor
By:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

WASHINGTON DC
Source: Flightglobal.com
in 3 hours
The
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
could soon be carrying the U-2 Dragon Lady’s most prized surveillance sensors under a “cooperative research and development agreement” between negotiated between Northrop
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and the US Air Force.

The two side say they are close to an agreement that would modify two aircraft with a "intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) payload adaptor" to carry United Technologies Corporation’s Optical Bar Camera (OBC) and Senior Year Electro-optical Reconnaissance System (SYERS) – currently flown on the U-2 – as well as the MS-177 which is carried by Northrop's E-8C JSTARS.

Northrop says it has received a formal request from the air force to pair the MS-177 with the Global Hawk and the company expects to be put on contract for that work by the end of the year. Additionally, the air force tells Flightglobal that it will make the OBC and SYERS-2C available to Northrop for a demonstration in “early fiscal year 2016”.

“If the air force successfully contracts for integration of the ISR payload adaptor, the modification is anticipated to be completed approximately 24 months after a signed cooperative research and development agreement (CRADA),” service spokeswoman Vicki Stein says. “The air force is currently reviewing a proposal with an estimated award in fiscal year 2016.”

getasset.aspx


Northrop Grumman senior engineer Phil Lo holding one of the 17 universal payload adaptor mounts that will fitted inside the payload bay of the modified RQ-4B Global Hawk.

Northrop Grumman

Confirmation that the air force intends to proceed with the payload adapter demonstrations follows a six-month study into Northrop’s internally developed “universal payload adapter” solution, which the company says will enable the Global Hawk to carry the service's primary airborne surveillance sensors to monitor global hot spots. The service has previously said that the proposal would cost $487 million and take five years, however, the review appears to have concluded that the process will be much quicker and cheaper than first imagined.

The fact that the unmanned aircraft could soon be carrying U-2 sensors is likely to add fuel to the long-running debate over whether to retire
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
’s manned U-2 or the Global Hawk – since the air force does not want to keep both high-altitude spy planes. In a
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, the air force said it is feasible for the RQ-4 to carry various airborne sensors weighing up to 544kg (1200lb) with “negligible differences” in performance compared to the U-2.

“We are expecting the CRADA with the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
to be signed soon,” says Mick Jaggers, vice president and program manager of Northrop’s Global Hawk division. “This will allow us to receive two Global Hawk aircraft to begin physical modification for the [payload adaptor]. When a SYERS sensor is provided by the USAF, [we] will proceed to flight test to prove out the capability. We also expect to fly the OBC in early 2016.”

The air force and Northrop declined to say how much it will cost to perform the modification, since the negotiations are ongoing. The most noticeable physical changes would be a large canoe-shaped sensor bay on the Global Hawk’s undercarriage and 17 new payload adaptor fixtures. There are also various software and mission system changes, and each sensor requests its own custom adaptor for power, cooling and coupling.

getasset.aspx


Northrop Grumman
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top